Share

Combat Operations in Fallujah

by: Dahr Jamail, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
A woman gestures toward the wreckage of a car destroyed in a car bomb explosion in Baghdad's Shiite enclave of Sadr City, Iraq, Wednesday, April 29, 2009.

    Indicative of the rapidly deteriorating situation in Iraq, on May 1 the US military reported the death of a Naval petty officer who was killed "on April 30 while conducting combat operations in Fallujah, Iraq." The Department of Defense report went on to explain that the sailor "was deployed with an East Coast based Navy SEAL team." That same day, the military announced the deaths of two marines "killed while conducting combat operations against enemy forces here April 30." The dateline for the latter press release is "AL ANBAR PROVINCE, Iraq." Apparently, all is not well in Fallujah and al-Anbar province. The US military, having met the fiercest resistance throughout their occupation of Iraq in these areas, is once again conducting combat operations there.

    The fact that the US military has largely hung the Sahwa out to dry, exposing the 100,000 strong Sunni militia to the ire of the Maliki government for ongoing assassinations and detentions, has taken the lid off the volcano that the Sahwa were keeping from erupting. Let us remember - it was the Sahwa who kept al-Qaeda in Iraq in check, not the US military or the Iraqi military. As members of the Sahwa continue to leave their security posts due to lack of pay and being targeted by the Iraqi government, they are returning to the resistance from which most of them had emerged to join the militia.

    Let us also be clear about the fact that the Sahwa allied themselves with the US military so as to protect themselves from the Shia-dominated sectarian government of Prime Minister Maliki.

    I asked a good friend of mine in Baghdad to interview a Sahwa leader in the Adhamiya district of Baghdad a few days ago. The leader asked to be identified as Abu Ahmed. He is 40 years old, married, has four children, and had this to say, "I would like to say that the Iraqi Government, and especially Mr. Maliki, are continuing to target us. They have been doing this from the beginning, and they continue to do this against the Sahwa. The reason is because we are Sunni and the Iraqi government are a sectarian government."

    Abu Ahmed said he and his fellow Sahwa members support the immediate withdrawal of all occupation forces "and then we can change our government by ourselves and build a nationalist government to replace this current sectarian government."

    He then added, succinctly, "Our purpose is to end the occupation, end al-Qaeda, and make a new Iraq that is safe."

    Fate, as if to underscore his point, found rivers of blood filling the streets of Baghdad the very next day. Simultaneous bombings in largely Shiite districts of the capital city killed more than 51 people. After the bombings, residents of the areas threw shoes and stones at Iraqi soldiers who arrived at the scene, blaming the soldiers for failing to protect them. A resident, in the aftermath of the bombings, expressed his rage to a reporter while Iraqi soldiers continued shooting at innocent people, "Is that what we deserve, on top of the bombs, that they shoot at people? Is this Maliki's government? Instead of helping us evacuate the wounded, they started shooting at us. This is Maliki's government. Can you hear the shooting? They're shooting at people. People are lying underneath cars."

    At the end of the day, over 70 Iraqis had died, with at least 116 wounded. Underscoring the sectarian nature of the government, Baghdad security spokesman Maj. Gen. Qassim Atta told reporters, "This series of bombings was supposed to be carried out on the 28th, the birthday of Saddam Hussein," referencing the former dictator executed in December 2006.

    Meanwhile, that same day, roadside bombs targeted US patrols in two areas of Baghdad.

    My Iraqi journalist friend in Baghdad, who interviewed Abu Ahmed, commented on the aftermath of the bombings that day, "The Iraqi situation is getting so much worse Mr. Dahr. So many car bombs explode in Baghdad now - it is daily. All the streets are closed today so the police and army can search every car, checking everything, and we can't move or work in this situation at all. And yet, the bombings continue nonstop."

    As the calendar turned to May, April was the deadliest month since September for US troops, with at least 18 dead, doubling the previous month's total. April also found the most troops killed in combat in a month so far this year. April was also the deadliest month for Iraqis in over a year.

    In a move strengthening US/Iraqi relations, Brig. Gen. Peter Bayer, the chief of staff for the US military's daily operations in Iraq, said that a US military raid in Kut that killed a man and woman, which had ignited tempers across the country and caused Prime Minister Maliki to demand the responsible soldiers to be handed over to Iraqi authorities, told reporters the raid was "lawful and legal," and responded to the question of whether American soldiers would appear in Iraqi courts with, "No. Absolutely not."

    So much for Iraqi sovereignty.

    On May 2, two more soldiers were killed in the northern city of Mosul, while US forces were attacked with roadside bombs in both Basra and Fallujah. Clearly, resistance against the occupation is once again nationwide, spanning from Iraq's northernmost and southernmost cities. Now that the British are pulling out of their area of control in Southern Iraq, US troops are filling the void - hence, the attack in Basra. Expect these to increase rapidly, particularly in light of events such as the Kut raid.

    The signs of Iraqi government attacks against Sahwa members show no sign of abating either, as that day gunmen attacked a Sahwa checkpoint in Yusufiya, injuring a Sahwa fighter. Meanwhile, Iran was shelling northern Iraq - lobbing artillery shells into suspected Party of Free Life of Kurdistan (PJAK) locations there. The PJAK are supported by the US, as they have been conducting covert destabilization operations in Iran for months now. The northwestern area of Iraq that borders Turkey was not without violence either. There, Turkish forces launched an airstrike just hours after ten Turkish soldiers were killed in what was believed to be a Kurdish rebel strike in Turkey. Turkish airstrikes in northern Iraq are, however, nothing new. They've been a weekly or bi-monthly occurrence for several months running now.

    The meat grinder that is the US occupation of Iraq is picking up speed once again. Attacks against both Iraqi civilians and US soldiers are increasing dramatically. At the time of this writing, five soldiers have been killed in the last four days, over a dozen innocent Iraqis have been slaughtered, and over a dozen have been wounded. Iraqi government attacks on the Sahwa continue, al-Qaeda is now operating largely at will, and attacks on US forces are now happening all over Iraq - including in Kurdish-controlled areas of northern Iraq.

    Combat operations in Fallujah. A recent UN report documenting ongoing US torturing of Iraqis in military detention facilities in Iraq. Roadside bomb attacks against US forces spanning the entire geography of the country. Iraqis being slaughtered in numbers not seen since George W. Bush still had eight months left in his second term.

    What has changed in Iraq?

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Dahr Jamail, an independent journalist, is the author of "The Will to Resist: Soldiers Who Refuse to Fight in Iraq and Afghanistan," (Haymarket Books, 2009), and "Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches From an Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq," (Haymarket Books, 2007). Jamail reported from occupied Iraq for nine months as well as from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Turkey over the last five years.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

The US is getting out,

The US is getting out, that's what's changed. In a companion article, the Iraqi government announced that there would be no exceptions to US withdrawals from cities by June. What's not changed has been the Iraqi government's determination to enforce Shia dominance. As Dahr has demonstrated, the US has put into place a sectarian government, but it should also be emphasized that it is a sect that used to be oppressed by Iraqi governments going back a long time before Saddam. So, the parallel might be a bit like Zimbabwe, in which the oppressed take power and oppress the former oppressors. The only hope for Iraq is a non-sectarian nationalist movement, but opposition to the Shiite government seems to be most effective when it's sectarian as well--Sunni, not nationalist. It all boils down to one lesson: when W invaded Iraq and toppled Saddam, he let loose a hornet's nest, only barely contained by our occupation (and sometimes used by us to divide and rule). With our staged withdrawal, that suppressed conflict is coming out into the open: it won't be pretty. On the other hand, the US has no proper role in mediating this conflict. I hope (but probably in vain) that some disinterested body like the UN can get Sunnis and Shiites to talk and maneuver politically, instead of militarily. But what are the chances of that?

George Bush and Dick Cheney

George Bush and Dick Cheney should be put on the streets there to enforce order. Let them carry pistols and dress like regular soldiers. This would be justice. Thank you Dahr for your consistently great reporting,, more than any U.S. news organization can muster! Continued success and safety for you brave one.

US media not cover Iraq

US media not cover Iraq occupation much. Promise to leave delayed.

Typical US imperialism: a US

Typical US imperialism: a US general says a raid is "lawful and legal". Garbage... Maybe he might think a raid on "un-American elements" in the US is legal too?

My question to all is, what

My question to all is, what are the objectives of the US in Iraq since the surge? A brief tally is as follows: Original Objective=Democracy, Western style Reality=Sectarian government. Original Objective=Victory by the US, transfer of power to Iraqi security forces. Reality=reduction of military and civilian casualties per month. Objective=Oil resources under US/Western corporate distribution and production Reality= China to fund production of Iraq oil reserves in the West of Iraq?

Are people still in the mind

Are people still in the mind frame of wondering why this is happening? It was the Zionist plan that America be provoked into attacking Iraq; Iraq was always seen by the Zionist Entity as the real threat - they can deal with Syria. Zionist policy has been to weaken and if possible break up Iraq, something that is happening before our eyes, helped along in the northern, Kurdish part by a nest of Zionist agents. The Zionists are free for 20 years at least from the Iraqi threat. They are not free from others - the international boycott movement is gathering speed and adherents and Zionist companies are feeling the pinch, as are foreign companies that help them exist. I hope to see a reckoning, Blair and Bush in an international court for what they did, not forgetting Aznar, but I acknowledge it may never happen.

The US is not getting

The US is not getting out--not as long as the oil still pumps, the pipes flow and the energy routes need to be patrolled. So, we're in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan ,etc until the region runs dry or the empire runs out of money.

First off, ALL military

First off, ALL military personnel are "combat Troops" by definition. What are soldiers for but to fight? Further, to claim ANY US attacks in Iraq are "legal" is absurd. The entire thing was blatently Illegal from day 0ne. ~John L.

Thank you Dahr for

Thank you Dahr for continuing to report on developments and events in Iraq. I hear nearly nothing about Iraq from other news sources.

Hi Dahr: I am confused.

Hi Dahr: I am confused. Who or what is al queda, in your opinion. I have heard that al queda (the toilet) does not in fact exist, except as a false flag for the US occupation. What do YOU mean when you use the expression "al queda"? gc

"What do YOU mean when you

"What do YOU mean when you use the expression "al queda"? gc" Whatever anyone says, al Qaeda does exist. Al Qaeda does not refer to a toilet but to a data base. Historically it means a data base that originated in the Middle-east, rather then the toilet theory which assumes a tongue in cheek joke from Zionists. The database evolved into a list of Arab CIA assets, which for instance were recently used against Serbia in Clinton's period. In Bushes period their function changed from ally to "enemy", which set the new tone of acceptable international expansion. Naturally important members are never caught, only 'killed'. In Morocco a cell was discovered planning attacks on France, the head of the cell was French intelligence, in Palestine two cells were found, both headed by Israeli intelligence, and both planning attacks on Israel. As England declassifies documents, we discover that the history of the IRA's militancy is similar. The beauty in this form of operation is that all lower members are for real, so a compelling political case can be formed, with an illusion of national responsibility. Russia and China find their own ways to apply the international rhetoric to their own strategic goals.