Share

US Military Admits Errors in Air Strikes That Killed Scores of Afghan Civilians

by: Mark Tran  |  The Guardian UK

photo
Scores of Afghan civilians were killed and injured in US air strikes last month. (Photo: AFP / Getty Images)

    Report on raids that killed 140 villagers found rules had not been adhered to, official says.

    A failure to follow strict rules devised to prevent civilian casualties in Afghanistan led to the death of scores of villagers last month, a US military investigation has concluded.

    According to a senior military official who spoke to the New York Times, the report on the four May raids found that one plane was cleared to attack Taliban fighters, but then had to circle back and did not reconfirm the target before dropping its payload, leaving open the possibility that the militants had fled or that civilians had entered the target area in the intervening few minutes.

    In another case, a compound where militants were massing for a possible counterattack against US and Afghan troops was struck in violation of rules that required a more imminent threat to justify putting homes at risk, the official said.

    "In several instances where there was a legitimate threat, the choice of how to deal with that threat did not comply with the standing rules of engagement," the military official told the Times about the report's initial findings. The inquiry is not yet complete.

    The Afghan government said about 140 civilians were killed in the attacks in the western province of Farah in one of the worst cases of Afghan civilian deaths since the start of the campaign to topple the Taliban in 2001. An earlier US military inquiry put the tally much lower. It said that between 20 and 30 civilians were killed as three aircraft-carrier-based navy F/A-18 strike aircraft and an air force B-1 bomber attacked targets in the village of Granai in a battle that lasted more than seven hours.

    The earlier inquiry also concluded that 60 to 65 Taliban militants had been killed. US military officials said that Taliban fighters had deliberately fired on their forces and aircraft from compounds and other places where they knew Afghan civilians had sought shelter, in order to draw a response that would kill innocent people, including women and children.

    The incident began when Afghan soldiers and police officers went to several villages in response to reports that three Afghan government officials had been killed by the Taliban. The police were quickly overwhelmed and asked for help from US forces.

    Since the raid, US military commanders have once again promised to deal with the problem of civilian casualties, which has been a source of friction between coalition forces and the Afghan government. President Hamid Karzai has repeatedly told the US that civilian deaths from air strikes play into the hands of the Taliban.

    Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, nominated to replace the sacked general, David McKiernan, as the US commander in Afghanistan, said earlier this week that reducing civilian casualties was "essential to our credibility."

    He also told a confirmation hearing before the Senate armed services committee that any US victory would be "hollow and unsustainable" if it led to popular resentment among Afghanistan's citizens.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

During the Vietnam War they

During the Vietnam War they said the same and continued to slaughter innocents. More hollow lies coming from the brass and they will be believed. The US is on the long road to defeat in Afghanistan. The leader we installed in power has little support or credibility. And now there are plans to install a US citizen - the former ambassador - in a high position in the government. (Maybe they will give him the title of Viceroy, in honor of past British colonial failure.) We are reaping what we sowed. US support for Islamic fundamentalism and warlordism in Afghanistan returned to haunt us on 9/11. And the bloody muck just gets deeper. Obama seems to have swallowed it all. And now he dines with those who bankrolled the wahabi fundamentalism in Afghanistan & Pakistan.

Call it a "mistake" or an

Call it a "mistake" or an integral part of the kind of scorched earth policy the military tried in Vietnam, in the end it will amount to the same failures. Unpopular wars against populations and their desires may have their momentary successes, but if the history of Afghanistan is any guide, the defeat of foreign armies is one of their signature talents.

It's the drones. They are

It's the drones. They are "piloted" from CIA hq in Las Vegas, I believe. What a chicken shit way to fight a war. Karmically speaking, we haven't got a chance to win this.

The stupidity of the U.S.

The stupidity of the U.S. military knows no bounds. Apparently they haven't learned anything from Vietnam or Iraq. Alienating civilians is a sure way to lose. Bombing should be the last resort. An earlier report said the B-1 bomber dropped a 2,000 pound bomb. A 2,000 pound bomb should never be dropped even close to any civilian buildings; the overpressure can kill people a quarter of a mile away.