Share

The AMA's Unhealthy Obsession

by: Joe Conason  |  Truthdig

photo
The AMA is opposing health care reform. (Photo: AMA)

    Campaigning to build the widest possible consensus for reform of the nation's health care system, Barack Obama told the delegates of the American Medical Association that he wants their support, too. Persuasive and always polite, the president did not mention the embarrassing truth about his hosts - namely, that the AMA has undermined universal care with mindless zeal for more than 70 years.

    The real question is not what the AMA will support or whether the attitudes of the AMA have changed, but why anyone would still heed its policy prescriptions. Very few national organizations have been so wrong for so long about the matters most salient to their own members.

    The AMA's sad history dates back to the Depression of the 1930s, when progressive doctors sought to organize themselves into the first health cooperatives, or health maintenance organizations, so that they could provide care to working families under a group plan. Seeing a threat to its own power, the AMA, in a blatant antitrust violation, prohibited members from working for those early health maintenance organizations.

    During the decades that followed, the AMA dedicated millions of dollars to stopping universal health care in the United States, even as other developed nations were establishing a variety of successful systems that covered every citizen while holding down costs. This was an obsession that the organization shared with political forces on the far right. When President Harry Truman proposed a national health plan in 1948, the AMA unleashed a Red-baiting fury.

    In the book "The Culture of the Cold War," Stephen J. Whitfield recalls how the AMA vowed to "resist the enslavement of the medical profession," warning that Truman was attempting to impose "a monstrosity of Bolshevik bureaucracy" on America. In pamphlets issued to fight the Truman plan, AMA publicists included a phony quote from Lenin proclaiming "socialized medicine is the keystone to the arch of the Socialist State." The same pamphlets smeared supporters of Truman's "compulsory health insurance" plan by connecting them to the Communist Party.

    Having killed Truman's bill, the AMA continued to amass enormous amounts of money for what historians say was the most massive special-interest campaign in American history up to that time. Among the darkest episodes was its opposition to free government-sponsored distribution of the Salk polio vaccine, which the AMA and its extremist allies regarded as yet another step toward socialism. That plan, too, was killed, depriving millions of children and adults of critical care during a national epidemic, in an act that amounted to a lobbying violation of the Hippocratic oath.

    When John F. Kennedy began to work toward a national health system in 1962, the AMA again mounted a costly and clever opposition campaign, whose estimated cost reached $50 million - a lot of money in those days.

    It was a stealth effort, known as Operation Coffee Cup, that relied on doctors' wives to spread a propaganda message, taped by Ronald Reagan, among their friends and neighbors. As always, the rhetoric was hot. National health insurance would destroy "the sacred relationship between doctor and patient," and even "the sanctity of human personality." Doctors would be "regimented and made subordinate to the bureaucrat, and the people forced by law to accept such medical care as could be provided by a politically appointed bureaucrat."

    The AMA finally met defeat in 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson and a bipartisan coalition in Congress succeeded in passing Medicare. By then, public support for national health insurance had swelled, leading to a massive repudiation of right-wing ideology and the Republican Party in the 1964 election. Indeed, many Republicans realized that their party's adherence to the AMA's rigid opposition had led to their catastrophic electoral failure.

    That lesson was lost on the AMA, whose delegates soon elected a daffy far-right doctor employed by oil billionaire H. L. Hunt as their president, with a mandate to wage total war against Medicare. The organization has continued to fight reform, helping to kill plans proposed by every Democratic president.

    The AMA is like a company union that pretends to represent employees while always protecting the interest of the boss. The result is that American doctors find themselves at the mercy of corporate insurance bureaucrats - and that most of them no longer belong to the once-venerable organization that purports to speak for them. If the AMA truly supports reform this time, as its leaders have announced, then it must abandon its historical subservience to corporate medicine. These physicians are long overdue to heal themselves.

    ---------

    Joe Conason writes for The New York Observer.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Today is a good day on TO

Today is a good day on TO for discussing canards and other received "wisdom". Elsewhere I noted an article which has a headline using the term "moderate Democrats" which then goes on to identify those "moderates" as conservatives. Well there is in the broad press some kind of tacit received wisdom about the AMA, i.e. that it is somehow representative and authoritative for the medical profession. It is not. I understand that only 30 percent of doctors belong to it. The AMA is just a part of the corrupt, criminal medical insurance cartel.

Have you seen a poor

Have you seen a poor physician? Why should AMA go against its members unbridled greed? Isn't Medicine a BUSINESS? In a greed-based system, devil takes the ones left behind.

The AMA does not represent

The AMA does not represent the medical profession, it only represents those who comprise it - the selfish, the unfeeling, the lying,the uncaring. Those to whom the Hippocratic oath is meaningless. The AMA bears a good deal of responsibility for the destroyed lives that have resulted from it's profit-at-any-cost policies. It also bears a lot of responsibility for the sad state of the American economy, by having impeded any attempt to establish a health care system. The whole organization is guilty of massive malpractice.

Actually, there are some

Actually, there are some poor physicians. They are general practitioners, family physicians -those non-specialists who are reimbursed at the lowest rates by insurers. Those just out of medical school, still burdened by debt really do have a hard time of it. This is the main reason so many doctors specialize, and why we have a shortage of g.p.s. H.R. 676 provides for a fairer remuneration system (with physicians' input). The AMA is not helping the guys at the bottom of the heap.

I think the AMA is

I think the AMA is harvesting what it planted. It's membership is somewhere between 30 and 39% of the physicians in America and going south. They no longer have the thrust that they once had, and if they don't change, they will lose even more physician support. On the other hand, there are a number of physician organizations which are doing everything they can to get single payer approved, not to mention a public option. Perhaps the time has come to treat the AMA the way we treat the successor to the White Citizens Council. Ignore them.

The AMA does have a sordid

The AMA does have a sordid history. In "Nazi Nexus", Eugene Black points out that during the early 1930s The Journal of The AMA was the USA outlet acclaiming the Nazi eugenics movement in conjunction with the funding that movement by the Carnegie Foundation. The' JAMA' and The' Journal of Heredity' both supported the master race hypothesis. Of course, it has also been prostituted to reactionary politics. I started my practice in 1950 and attended one AMA convention where I became aware that it was not a scientific organization but a trade organization, attended by the more affluent medical specialities, sponsored by the pharmaceutical and insurance industries, and having little to do with keeping one abreast of the progress in scientific medicine. For keeping up I depended on the American College of Physicians and The American Rheumatism Association, their meetings and their journals. Please do not equate all physicians incomes. We Internists, and General Practitioners, traditionally have had approximately 10-20% income of that of the various surgical specialites which have been glamorized by the popular media but require essentially the same number of years in professional training. A good PR agency can do much for misdirecting public perception.

After nearly dying of over

After nearly dying of over treatment, over-drugging, harsh drugging, conflicting treatments, and forgotten treatments, I finally gave up on the good doctors of the Mayo Clinic for lupus. Well, not really. They stopped taking my very excellent health insurance which wasn't paying them enough. My general practitioner has kept me sane and healthy for the past decade. He has a very nice house, takes an annual vacation and that's about it.