Share

The Scorpion Syndrome

by: Favilla  |  Les Echos

photo
Applying the ancient fable of the scorpion and the frog to contemporary banks' behavior, the authors writing as Favilla opine: "There would be a great deal to retain from this little story, were it not that, in finance, there are no morals." (Image: Zoe Piel/ www.zoepiel.com)

    The attorney general for the state of New York has just made an assessment of Wall Street's incorrigible obsession with bonuses, which has resumed like a wildfire. Once again, it inflames the cupidity of actors and begins to fan the anger of American public opinion, which is something new in this country traditionally hardcore in its adherence to the market. The public has good reason to be angry: together, nine big banks paid out some $33 billion in bonuses for 2008, while they recorded over $80 billion of losses and raked in over $175 billion of taxpayer assistance. Official good resolutions had no impact on their behavior. No one will change them.

    It's like the scorpion in the well-known fable. One day, the scorpion - who knows how to sting, but not how to swim - asks a frog to take him on his back to cross a river. Naturally reticent, given the scorpion's bad reputation, the frog allows himself to be convinced since it's obviously in the scorpion's interest to escape drowning. Nonetheless, the scorpion stings the frog in the middle of the river. And in final response to the ultimate question of the dying frog, the scorpion answers that it's in his nature to sting. Thus, their joint death signifies the fatal conjunction of trust and instinct. There would be a great deal to retain from this little story, were it not that, in finance, there are no morals.

    In the eddies of the recent crisis, we have seen many frogs die: savers, investors, the taxpayers' public money, and, more generally, various actors in the real economy: but overall, very few scorpions. The frogs are partly responsible for this, since, seized themselves by the syndrome of the killer-insect, they haven't known how to master the instinct (greed) that pushes people to exploit the system with no consideration of the consequences. As for the new scorpion, the eagerness of the crowd of frogs will have allowed him to cross the ford on a sort of bridge of batrachians that he killed one after the other until he arrived on the opposite shore. Warped arthropod, he didn't even make the scorpion's signal gesture of honor by committing suicide when he was surrounded by fire. If the Wall Street fable, unlike the other, contains neither moral nor honor, it undoubtedly must be because the laws of finance are not the laws of nature.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

A fable for our times for

A fable for our times for sure. Greed is the greatest sin for it truly benefits neither the greedy one nor his victims. Once you have more than you can ever spend on living, the money, itself, does not profit you. It only robs other of life chances: dignity, security, and - yes - health and life itself. Money is a zero sum game. And the greedy? Well, they remain hungry no matter how much they gorge.

The thieving yuppie vermin

The thieving yuppie vermin criminals of Wall St. have no other skills whatsoever. All they can do is lie and steal while producing NOTHING. It is their ONLY function. Ultimately the only solution is to eliminate their game . The US WILL eventually adopt a new currency, and disband the federal reserve as well as the CIA. The only question is HOW LONG WILL IT BE UNTIL THE PEOPLE WAKE UP AND ELECT A CONGRESS THAT WILL DO THIS NECCESARY JOB. An idea of mine that was actually a joke has been gaining more thought as an interim monetary policy: How about a NEW dollar that has steady value and can only be earned and spent by people who actually perform productive work for it. The old dollars can be left to float free in the hands of the pigs to do as they may. Whatever value they can achieve is fine, but I wouldn't bet much on it.

So. If it is the nature for

So. If it is the nature for corporations to give large bonuses, let all of us participate in the benefit by: A. Make all compensation (salary, bonus, commission) over $500, 000 be not deductable as a business expense. B. Make ALL compesation be subject to social security taxes (both employer and employee) C. Make profits from stock options be subject to the Self-Employment tax.

There are two other

There are two other perspectives to consider. If the government had not forced lenders to grant mortgages to people who the lending institutions knew were high risk, the losses would not have occurred. Also, if the government had not bailed them out and let them fail, the bonuses would not have been paid - they wouldn't have had the money. Bottom line, government interference just screws up the works.