Share

Martin Luther King Would Have Loved the Teabaggers, Not Called Them Racists

by: Mike Elk, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
While we may not agree with the teabaggers, they are not all crazy. (Photo: ajagendorf25 / flickr)

    A few weeks ago, I attended the teabagger protests in DC. The thing I noticed the most about the folks there was that, for the most part, they were friendly, nice, hardworking people. Sure, there were some crazies; sure, there were some racists. For the most part, though, they looked like the type of folks I grew up with in the labor movement, coming to DC to enjoy a protest and spend the rest of the weekend taking in some monuments and museums. These weren't rich suburbanites; the teabaggers I saw were mainly poor people, whose trip to DC were probably the only the vacation they would be able to afford this year.

    Growing up in Pittsburgh, I had known many poor white people, but they all seemed to vote for Democrats because they had manufacturing jobs and were union members. Gradually, though, the unions - which were a means of educating people about politics - evaporated under the anti-union policies of Democrats and Republicans alike. I saw more and more strong Democrats turn Republican as they began to distrust a Democratic Party that took away their jobs with policies like NAFTA and one after another massive corporate giveaway.

    Even recently, my own grandmother, a lifelong Democrat, admitted to my mother that she was unsure about health care reform because of the "death panels."

    Is my grandmother some sort of stupid, racist, teabagging reactionary? I think not. This is the woman who, after all, told me stories about how she was called a β€œMediterranean n**ger” growing up and was sympathetic to the experience of African-Americans. But has my grandmother been lied to by Democrats and Republicans alike and seen her standard of living decline over the past 30 years? Sure. And has this led my grandmother to the point where she is so confused about what to believe that she simply doesn't trust government because, mostly, what government has done is hurt her over the last 30 years? Without a doubt.

    As Sara Robinson argues in her must-read piece analyzing the rise of the teabagger movement among working-class Americans:

No democracy in history has ever survived with our current levels of inequality. There's no reason for the middle and working classes to trust anything about a system that's so clearly rigged to suck money straight out of their pockets into the tax-free offshore bank accounts of the wealthy - who, of course, turn right around and use that money to buy off our government, so they can suck up even more of our economy for themselves.

    People are confused. They are angry, and they have little faith in government.

    As the president pointed out in his speech, we are all guilty of racial subconscious on one level, but few of us intentionally want to hate another person. People get very offended when you call them racists because most people don't intend or want to act in a racist matter.

    I, myself, am guilty of have experiencing racist thoughts at time. But I have marched in civil rights marches, dated women of color and shared an apartment for a very long time with a person of color. However, I was outraged when the head of an organization told me that they would like to hire me, but they couldn't because they needed to hire a person of color.

    Likewise, I cringed a few weeks ago when a well-off, South Asian colleague of mine at a strategy meeting stood up and said, "Forget about white working class males. We need to expose them for the racist scumbags that they are."

    As a white male from a working-class background, I thought to myself, "Who the hell is this guy, to get up and say that the folks I grew up with - my family members - are 'racists scumbags.'" It made me feel defensive.

    I thought to myself, "I bet you the only white working-class males this guy interacts with are the guys serving him hamburgers on the way to his vacations in the Hamptons." My immediate reaction was not to listen to him, but to figure out a way to attack back.

    Likewise, the progressive movement - in particular, progressive bloggers - are making a big mistake in attacking the other side by calling them racist. It merely makes them feel defensive because nobody wants to listen to someone that is attacking them with such an emotional bomb.

    Its makes the teabaggers resent the progressive movement and view them as rich, college-educated elitists that only want to tell them how wrong they are.

    Meanwhile, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are giving white working-class males a huge hug. They are saying, "Come here; we understood you; we are one of you. We will fight on your behalf against elitist liberals who call you names." Working-class people, especially men, respond by listening to Glenn Beck even more and attacking progressives. It's an endless, destructive cycle in which no one wins.

    As Martin Luther King explained in his sermon "The Strength To Love":

Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.
Hate multiplies hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multiplies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction.

    During the whole dialogue on teabaggers, I never heard the narrative of why these poor people were turning up at the town halls. They were turning up because they were scared of change, because the only change they have known is their standard of living dramatically decreasing over the last 30 years. I never heard anyone talk about how most of the teabaggers are the people that need health care reform the most.

    In fact, we got off message entirely. We stopped talking about health care reform altogether. We failed to articulate a progressive vision these people might buy into. We took an eye for an eye, leaving everyone blind.

    Very few of us made any attempt to really reach out and embrace these teabaggers on the issues that we share with them. Many of their concerns about the bailout, NAFTA-style trade deals and the general loss of trust in government are core progressive issues. We could lock arms with the teabaggers and form a powerful alliance, but, instead, we attack our potential allies because we do not take the time to engage them.

    As Martin Luther King explains:

Men often hate each other because they fear each other; they fear each other because they don't know each other; they don't know each other because they cannot communicate.

    If we don't communicate with the white working class, we are never going to achieve true progressive change. We are just going to attack each other in an endless cycle and fail to realize our shared values.

    It's time that we raise up above immature name calling and start talking to the teabaggers. Together, we can win!

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
Share         

»


Mike Elk works for the Campaign for America's Future. Previously, he worked as a union organizer for the United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers, and as a staffer on the Obama-Biden campaign.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

mlk would have little

mlk would have little interest in a group of protesters hell-bent on preserving corporate profits rather than social justice... this writer must not read many bloggers...i saw folks commenting that the teabaggers [most of whom have health care they're afraid of losing] were disrupting town halls in states that needed health care reform the most, repeatedly.... the white working class threw their lot in with the plutocratic party because they vote their skin color rather than their wallet...good luck explaining that inconvenient truth to them at this late date

"I could hire one-half of

"I could hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half." -- Jay Gould, Wall Street financier, 1886

Mike makes some good points

Mike makes some good points here, particularly regarding the reflexive contempt in which White leftists hold their working and lower middle-class co-ethnics. He might want to devote some time to meditating upon the source of that hatred. Now if he'd only realize that "racial subconscious" [sic] is not something of which one is "guilty," but something that nature has encoded within us, and furthermore, something in which all groups except Whites are encouraged to take pride, he'd be making some real progress.

Sorry. Don't buy it. I'm

Sorry. Don't buy it. I'm all about organizing efforts aimed at creating working class movements - whether they "originate" from "within" the working class or from "without." But, there's no reason to pander to racist foolishness. It doesn't take a deep analysis to know that Glenn Beck and company trade in hate. The only person who'd miss it is someone who's filled with hate to begin with.

You can start the healing by

You can start the healing by not using a derogatory, liberal (not 'progressive', liberal) term 'teabagger' to describe (label) a huge diverse class of worried people who don't necessarily agree with the rather drastic solutions proposed by the liberal elite. For example, when someone tells an entire class of people that they MUST now do something that they are not currently doing - or they will be fined - What are they supposed to think? As to 'death panels' - it is an inflammatory descriptor - but in our CURRENT healthcare system the dirty not-so-secret is that care is rationed NOW. Not everyone who wants a liver transplant, or a new heart, or expensive new treatment gets it. Panels of doctors in hospitals make decisions, and some people get care and others are denied. Patients (sort of) understand it - but its not the Government i.e. faceless bureaucrats - making the decision, its a group of people close to the situation. Even with Medicare in most cases its the doctors not the regulators. Let's face it - the result is the same, but a Government panel isn't involved. So when old people worry about government death panels - they are worrying about people far away 'in Washington', not in their town, not breathing the same air they breath making life and death decisions about them. An emotional response? Of course it is - but it is NOT an irrational response.

communication with the

communication with the overwhelming majority of these ilk is next to impossible without an extraordinary effort at "de-programing" on a scale that would make the Manhattan Project look like playing with JUNIOR LINCOLN LOG SET. It wasn't by mere accident that they are so dim and deluded. it it is the result of an amoral pervasive and perfidious mindset design for control. The two classes upon Hitler rise to power were the rich minority who controlled the means of production and the lower class of workers. One of the first groups against whom the brown shirts wreaked havoc were the trade unionists/ socialists whom the powers that be demonized. Sounds familiar doesn't, Mike. So long as America's unions remain apologists for the system for which its raison d'etre is the destruction of a viable vibrant more astute worker class, one would have a better chance of blowing oput a light bulb than communicating with the teabaggers, fundamentalist nut cakes, uber patriots... Mike, you can be proud of the UE for whom you worked as an organizer. My mentor when I got involved in organized labor more than 40 years ago was a UE organizer of the 1940's. The things he taught me were instilled in my heart as well as my brain.

I have communicated with the

I have communicated with the white working class, that's my family. But what it comes down to is that facts don't matter. There is no communication if you do not share the same delusions. It's the peasant mentality and I don't know of any way to change the hearts of those that are not based in reality.

Would this be a mythical

Would this be a mythical Martin Luther King, with knowledge that he would be assassinated, or the Martin Luther King we knew before that terrible day? Perhaps one's attitude might differ from the other. I believe the author is quite naive. These protesters are being manipulated--when they are not the manipulators themselves. They are dupes of a corporate elite system that feeds off the State and both willing and unwilling co-actors. Glenn Beck is giving John Birchers a huge hug, in fact. But these are not people with whom I have anything in common--in fact, as a woman, as an intellectual, and as someone whose religion does not match theirs, I would be one of their first victims. The mythical and wiser Martin Luther King Jr would know who his true enemies were, and would be cognizant of the danger of associating with them.

Finally, an article from

Finally, an article from truthout that doesn't reek of negativity, frustration, or pain... The uber-elite w/their lobbyists, media, and billions in Wall St have made it such that no change is possible w/out majority agreement by the masses. A King-type message of love is the perfect response in a tall hall when dealing w/those whom in reality share the same goals. However, in today's society we have ACTIVE members who on a daily basis have a $$$-AGENDA (GOP hopefuls, big insurance, right-wing media) to spread discord amongst the masses. LOVE WILL NOT WORK on these powers that be, and (as we've seen) hardball tactics by left-wingers merely get spun into deceit for use against them. Fixing the education (critical thinking) or media, or both, in this country I think are the best way to approach our current crises long-term.

On Sun, 10/04/2009 - 17:36

On Sun, 10/04/2009 - 17:36 β€” Anonymous wrote- "the white working class threw their lot in with the plutocratic party because they vote their skin color rather than their wallet" Do you know any white working class? Apparently not because many of us still vote for Democrats. Do you really think Obama got elected without a majority (or at the very least nearly 50%) of the white middle class? You're statement reeks of ignorance and racism.

According to this article,

According to this article, the teabaggers are just waiting to welcome us if we only say the right things. Has he really tried that? I have. What I got in returnwas malicious caricatures of Obama in the form of juvenile cartoons, and one-sided diatribes about socialism and the hated liberals. They may be good people as long as you agree with them but they do not tolerate disagreement or reasoned discussion on political or "moral" issues. They are rooted in beliefs about many subjects that are just as deeply ingrained as religion. That is not accidental, the conservative propaganda machine has spent decades building those fictions, and they can not be dispelled with a hug. George Lakoff has some pertinent thoughts on how to present the progressive outlook. Take a look at his articles.

James Earl Ray was an early

James Earl Ray was an early teabagger; GOD please protect Obama's life ...

"...coming to DC to enjoy a

"...coming to DC to enjoy a protest and spend the rest of the weekend taking in some monuments and museums." This line is appalling, and contradicts the title and premise of this article. I am certain that MLK's fight for civil rights was more than just a vacation to see monuments in DC.

The author makes good

The author makes good points, and the response should not be what has become common cynicism (citing Jay Gould's remark is emblematic), rather how is it possible that we have come to believe that there is nothing but bad faith and that ignorance (fear driven, product of media, bad schooling, and/or just not having had options or opportunity other than just getting on), we who like the above commentators are, I assume, better informed and with greater cultural resources. Cynicism is self fulfilling, insisting that nothing can be done, doing nothing and then being self congratulatory for being right. If we want to change the degraded state of our political debate, and the macro-social and economic conditions that underpin that debate we must also have some faith in both ourselves and our fellow citizens. This is more difficult than pointing at the 'gullible fools' and throwing up our hands. We must begin to believe in the fact that we do learn, that most of us want to understand, that anger is overcome by understanding, we can shift the field of discussion. To do so we must aim our critical attention at the causes of our current conditions, and become proactive in insisting that this become the discussion. The causes of our present situation are not difficult to find and they are not the tea baggers.

I must admit that I was not

I must admit that I was not there and consequently cannot speak with the authority of Elk and others who joined the gathering. However, as I carefully studied the photos of the event, I realized that these were overwhelmingly comfortable, middle-class, and middle-aged caucasians. If Elk regards these as the poor, he has unfortunately failed to see a VERY large segment of the American population that was clearly not there. The poor in America do not limit their vacations to one protest per annum in DC; they have NO vacations. I plead for open eyes and for honest observation.

"mlk would have little

"mlk would have little interest in a group of protesters hell-bent on preserving corporate profits rather than social justice" You mean like forcing everyone to give money to insurance companies whether they want to or not? The insurance industry has never had a bigger friend in DC then Obama and the rest of the DLC, business-friendly "centrist" Democrats. To the anonymous poster I quoted above I suggest you re-read and take to heart the last paragraph in Mr. Elk's article.

Mr. Elk is correct that most

Mr. Elk is correct that most Tea Party protesters are not racist. However, he is wasting his breath telling that to liberals addicted to the race card.

I suggest everyone reading

I suggest everyone reading this start growing as much of your own food as you can. Learn how to compost and mulch. And while you are at it, share some of your much better tasting food with your teabagger neighbors, and help them to start their own gardens. Learn how to weld and repair your own equipment and vehicles and your neighbors'. Form co-ops. BTW, one of the highest paying jobs is a mechanic who can fix modern computerized cars and trucks. Instead of watching TV, teach yourselves and save very large sums of money. Form co-ops.

It is possible progressives

It is possible progressives need to reach out to the teabaggers to win, but you never really prove that premise at all. You don't explain who the people are, what they represent. Except that they anecdotally remind you of the white working class you know. What if they are a racist, partisan/religious fringe that should be ignored? What if they represent different factions and only certain groups should be recruited? You mostly ignore that there was a racist element of those events without question. We should at least name who from where needs outreach, and what the value of time/energy spent is. If this country can begin to build a majority on people of color voters, that's exciting and white progressives will not be served by us demanding "hey don't forget us! MLK would want us all to be friends".

You seem to think that one

You seem to think that one cannot love a racist. That by naming racism and the people who are supporting it, you are de facto hating. You are wrong. I have a large contingent of relatives I love and would risk my life and limb and last dime to help if they called me. And they are, many of them, quite open racists. If Martin Luther King could not name a racist when he met one, and still love him, you might have a point. But I think you are confusing passivity with non-violence. MLK would spot the confederate flags, and the derogatory images and still love these folks. But if he couldn't call them racists, I would stop admiring his work and wisdom. White denial is the new racism, and you sound like you have bought into it. MLK would want us to learn what it means to be anti-racist, instead of encourage us to pretend that friendly racists are not racist at all - if my estimation of him is at all accurate.

I like the author's points,

I like the author's points, and especially like the way he presents them without attacking. The change, from a "teabagger" perspective, that is being promoted by the Obama/Pelosi regime is a change from control of the government by the people to control of the people by the government. This is what, at its core, the "teabaggers" are protesting.

Neither Dr. King nor any of

Neither Dr. King nor any of us who marched in the 60s would endorse the hatred and proposed violence of the "conservative", "right-wing" demagogues and the mobs who follow them. Dr. King would NOT support Palin, Limbaugh, Beck et al as they foment hatred against the President of the United States and spew lies about his proposals. What are you reading, Mike Elk, and what's wrong with your mind?

Many white people from

Many white people from working class backgrounds, especially those who tried to better themselves through "education," a way people traditionally moved to better circumstances in America, have wound up being indoctrinated into think-tanked "p.c." socializations that have more to do with propagating the current bank-indebted welfare state than with any form of actual "socialism" anyway. If one steps way-way-way back, they can see the attacks on religious and other freedoms under the guise of "free speech," and so on. As times get tough, many on the "left" will come to see they weren't really so "left," after all, not really. With luck, genuinely decent individuals will push against ill-motivated ways of using language for political agendas. Mr. Elk seems to be awakening to the reality--- many people have never seen him as part of the diversity he thought he was helping to strive for. Sadly, to coral a coalition of reactionary thinkers (who have felt "outside the system") always solicits another "out group." Many minority-identified people see themselves as an "outgroup" when in fact, their coalition is an "in group." Whites are the ground against which they have organized. The fact that many of those whites are relatively powerless ---currently many in Tennessee are actually living in tents, and whites in Michigan have been hanging by a thread for a long time--- but Mr. Elk's colleague a) has not been told this b) is in a country that doesn't care and c) might not care even if he knew. That's what some call a liberal. And why many poor people just see them as out for themselves. The right, of course, is often no better.

You spend some time talking

You spend some time talking to these folks, and you find out "truth" is a very malleable commodity. The issue here is that it doesn't matter what level of evidence you lay out, these folks reject it. MLK also said - "Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity. Hate destroys a man’s sense of values and his objectivity. It causes him to describe the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, and to confuse the true with the false and the false with the true." And what we are dealing with here in terms of the Tea Baggers is hate. Now maybe it isn't the old Emmitt Till kind of racism... But it is still racism.

The only way any real change

The only way any real change in this country has ever gotten accomplished is by unifying and forcing power to listen to the people- if we can't listen to eachother than why do you(going out less to Mike than to the commentors) expect to win? Because we voted for a guy who said he would? Well he'll sign the bill when it gets to his desk but we have 2 major forces to get over first: economic and social. Economic we'll never get over- we have trillions of global dollars so the only way is social: Rush and Beck have manipulated and convoluted our friends and neighbors(Well I live in Pennsylvania so maybe those living in the DC bubble don't know what I'm talking about) and the only way to bring them back is oldschool community organizing and going to talk to them. Are some racist? sure; is there an undertone? fine, but the teabaggers have legit issues. Like many of my liberal friends they've lost faith in their government and after 3 decades of business-friendly policy WHO WOULDN'T? We need to prove that our side is the viable option to fixing government and calling them all racists is just going to turn them off- are they ALL going to listen to us? No, but some will, and everytime we turn one away we may have lost an ally. Are they being manipulated? Sure, I agree 100%- the global corporatocracy has taken well meaning individuals and turned them against us- they've done the classical hiring half of the working class to kill the other half. Do you commentators think by killing THEIR half of the working class is going to help OUR half? That's what the top 1% wants. You're playing their game.

Only MLK can tell you what

Only MLK can tell you what he would do. It bothers me when people say what someone would have said or done. Me , you, and everyone else have no idea what a dead man's perspective is. So that makes this whole article seem irrelevant. Also, Dr.King was known for calling folks out on their racism so why wouldn't he?

On Sun, 10/04/2009 - 17:36

On Sun, 10/04/2009 - 17:36 β€” i wrote "the white working class threw their lot in with the plutocratic party because they vote their skin color rather than their wallet" On Sun, 10/04/2009 - 20:42 β€” dave wrote "Do you know any white working class? Apparently not because many of us still vote for Democrats. Do you really think Obama got elected without a majority (or at the very least nearly 50%) of the white middle class? You're statement reeks of ignorance and racism. " obama got 49% of the vote from whites without college degree in the midwestern states with a union presence .....nationally, he got 40% of the vote from that group...in the upper mountain west he got less than a third of those voters...in the deep south he got less than 15% [not a misprint] of those votre.... they are the "working class white voters" i'm describing.... ...if they voted their wallet, they wouldn't have voted for mccain.....outside the south, obama won whites with college degrees.... ps: i'm white...and live in a working class neighborhood....hard to call me a racist for pointing out the behavior of my fellow whites...just sayin.... i wrote:"mlk would have little interest in a group of protesters hell-bent on preserving corporate profits rather than social justice" On Sun, 10/04/2009 - 22:37 β€” Seth wrote: "You mean like forcing everyone to give money to insurance companies whether they want to or not? " all the town halls happened before this idea was on the table...the teabaggers were arguing for the status quo and wanted to make sure that those without insurance had no shot at a public option [or reform of any kind]...mlk would probably recognize health care as a "right." the protesters don't....

Bill P, I agree with some of

Bill P, I agree with some of what you say about a better way to approach such a dialogue. The "government panels" that you mention, however, are not part of the current bill. The current bill makes funds available for patients to consult with doctors in order to decide how they would like to handle end-of-life care, but it does not involve a panel of bureaucrats in far away Washington. I sympathize with your point about being anxious over requiring health care, it is very important to me to know at what income level the government will waive this requirement. However, in general i agree with the idea. Right now we have universal health care - but it is very inefficient. It is not fair to people who do pay for health care that they have to support the people who are uninsured. We use this same argument when considering car insurance. Because it is possible that you can injure me when you are driving your car you have to carry insurance. Since it is possible that you can have a heart attack and cost the rest of us money in treating you, you have to carry health insurance. thanks, Elliot

The race card is like crack

The race card is like crack cocaine to liberals. Once they start using it, they can't give it up.

The people being "handled"

The people being "handled" by the so-called conservatives and the neocons are people who do not have a world view in touch with reality. They are hard pressed to even know that they are simply followers and not leaders. They are steeped in the supernatural and truly have no basis on which to determine what reality is. We should never forget that. These are people whose whole lives are based on what someone else indoctrinates them with. They are taught not to think. Calling them racist doesn't help even if it is an accurate description, and it is absurd to think it isn't. There whole lives are based on irrationality and racism in one form or another. We must never ever forget that.

MLK advocated a Society for

MLK advocated a Society for Creative Maladjustment. Anti-force mind-freedom folks keep that idea alive. I like the phrase about breathing the same air. When congresspeople move to D.C., they often become petty courtiers rewarded from goody-wands wielded by lobbyists and party seniors. Some congresspeople flat-out tell constituents that big donors mean they don't have to listen to ordinary people. Tea-bagging refers to taxation without representation. Because the institutions D.C. subsidizes are so large, ordinary people feel taxed but unrepresented, Bigger institutions and more subsidies don't fix it. Labeling demonstrators by the behaviors of a few is predictable. If nobody shows up for demonstrations, the agents provacateurs are obvious and can't fade into a crowd. Demonstrations waste energy and resources and allow the privileged to showcase force. Underground films and lawn signs are probably better. It takes enormous resources to chase down and incarcerate decentralized cells.

Always good to read a writer

Always good to read a writer who does not stereotype the working class as racist idiots.

I guess from all of the

I guess from all of the comments on this article I would have thought that we the people are supposedly be way pass the labeling of each other and to understand each other frustrations since there is a kernel of truth in their anger. As an independent of no political affiliation to either party, I can say that for sure that tribalism in America is alive and well. In fact the severity in blaming each other for the ills is getting to the point where I could probably see another civil war coming up. Hopefully I am mistaken about that possibility but it seems that the country is already in a great decline. We should NOT overuse the words such as 'teabagger',' liberal', and other words that instigate fear, anger, and mistrust of each other. Instead just use the simple words such as "Americans" or "citizens" rather than tagging them into some category. This article is truly what we need in journalism to cure the poisonous environment that we live in. I am getting quite tired from the tirades and bickering of both political spectrum supported and enhance emotional distrust from all mediums ( newspaper, television, internet, radio, etc.) In colleges as well as think tanks, and like minded institutions which suppose to foster open-mindess have harshly segregated the 'freedom of thought' than fulfilling the racial quota as created the once freedom of thought into something that is not its intended use.

Actually, I went to a speech

Actually, I went to a speech recently given by Noam Chomsky in the Bay Area of California. He talked about the Tea Parties for a few minutes and pointed out that many of their grievances (like the bailout and loss of jobs, wages and benefits) are very real and that they are just looking for an avenue to be heard. He asked the question "Why aren't WE organizing them? Why are we letting the Glenn Beck's and Rush Limbaugh's of the world lead them?" I also believe that despite the fact that many of these people are older and more socially conservative, if we talk to them about our shared interests and get beyond the thought-killing slogans like "big government" and so forth, we'll find that they don't have interests much different from ours. I bet that most of them are former union-members! Lets go out and create a dialogue with them!

"And what we are dealing

"And what we are dealing with here in terms of the Tea Baggers is hate. " What? So no more protests from now on? We switch from the Bush to the Obama regime, and no one can be against anything the government does? I'm not a Republican nor a fan of Beck or Limbaugh, but I'm really against the current health care reform proposal. It's not hard to see that factors like processed diet, pollution, and a rigged market will make health care costs continue to skyrocket. There is more profit in being sick, getting repeated screenings, and forcing the entire population to be customers of this lousy health care industry is only going to make things worse. If you learn the facts, you will see that Big Pharma and the insurance industry will benefit greatly from this so-called 'reform'. Not the American people.

To quote Jesse Walker, "I'm

To quote Jesse Walker, "I'm sure Elk was genuinely unaware that the Tea Party marchers consider the word "teabaggers" an especially obnoxious example of "immature name calling." Nonetheless, he sounds like an earnest Special Olympics volunteer who doesn't understand why his "Go, retards!" chant isn't catching on. "

Let us be brutally honest -

Let us be brutally honest - a lot of frothing so-called "progressives" are going to go crazy before this crisis is resolved. They believe in their own inspired intelligence, which ranks right up there with the delusions of Helicopter Ben Bernanke, assuring us that the housing market could never fall. He is reputed to be a fairly bright guy too, but that's not doing us any good. The Tea Party protesters include people from all walks, who include some very bright people. Get over that condescending attitude, clean the crud out of your ears, and start listening. Tired old progressive platitudes are not going to resolve this crisis, any more than they resolved matters in the former USSR. The problems today are huge, and "spend more, borrow more, inflate more" policies are 180 degrees from the right direction. Stepping on the accelerator when one is careening over a cliff is not a rational option. Defending the "spend more, borrow more, inflate more" policy is not progressive; it is reactionary, the sign of a person who is not willing to face reality and grow up.

Blasphemy! MLK's eloquence

Blasphemy! MLK's eloquence stirred the conscience of a world that still accepted racism. Invoking MLK in a conversation about Teabaggers is a worthless waste of time and I'm disappointed in truthout.org for running this piece. The teabaggers may well be largely comprised of nice, hardworking people, but it's been well documented that the movement's beginnings were artifical, grown out of well-funded, partisan out-of-work GOP operatives like Dick Armey who paid extra to make it all look like real grassroots and resigned when he was exposed. The organizers were able to get actual followers after a few issues caught on - big government, bailouts, excessive spending and "socialism". But the stupidity and hypocrisy of the message is palpable: 75% of the pre-Obama federal debt was signed off on by Reagan and the Bushes. They are more to blame for putting our kids in hock than anyone who came after. Was Obama supposed to magically make that deficit and the economic meltdown he was handed disappear? Do nothing? Cut taxes for the rich some more? What then? In fact, Bush43 wanted an even more extreme bailout - $700 billion overnight with no accountability, beside the TWO stimulus packages he took out on our unborn kids' credit. How come Bush never got a Hitler moustache for that? I agree Obama isn't handling the economy right - but it's because he's following his predecessors! The Teabagger movement is all about preserving corporate profiteering. If any Teabagger was truly educated, they'd be protesting the GOP much worse, looking at the hundreds of billions in waste and fraud perpetrated by KBR, Blackwater and government giveaways to big oil and defense contractors instead of screaming about ACORN's puny $55 million. MLK has no place in this argument. It's like suggesting Ghandi would have approved of the Cash For Clunkers program. Sorry, Mr. Elk but it's a different, more complex time and you can't get away with this kind of name dropping to make your case.

This is the first liberal

This is the first liberal blog post I've read in some time that doesn't totally infuriate me. I consider myself a libertarian and while I left the Tea Party movement mostly because they were too conservative for my taste (mostly my local group's views on exactly why healthcare is bad, immigration, religion, etc.), I still consider myself a fellow traveler in a way. For the record, I have a B.S. in Economics, so for the most part I'm not a dumb guy, nor do I consider myself a racist and I can assure you that I don't care what color Obama's skin is, I very much disagree with his policy proposals. Yes, they really should have been protesting the GOP as well but it seems that mostly with the rise of Glenn Beck and the financial crisis has there been an impetus for a conservative mass movement against big government. Also, I object to the term "Teabagger." "Tea Party protester" isn't as concise but I'm inclined to agree with Jesse Walker and view it as analogous to shouting "Go retards!" at the Special Olympics.

Reason.com bemusedly pointed

Reason.com bemusedly pointed out today that if this blogger wanted a dialog with the protestors he would stop referring to them by the derogatory term "teabaggers." The term was created to defame them.

Origin of the term

Origin of the term Teabaggers? It came from the movement itself, when they asked people to "teabag" Obama by sending symbolic teabags, apparently ignorant of the college prank of the same name. This was all well documented, including here: http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/04/10/gop-wants-to-teabag-barack-obama/ If they don't want to be called Teabaggers, they shouldn't use "teabag" as a verb, as found on their t-shirts or signs which are easily seen in Google Images searches. It's pretty basic to call someone who teabags a teabagger, so I'm surprised some are now taking offense. Maybe there is a split between the teabaggers on this issue? In any case, the use of the term was ludicrous from the start, as the original Boston Tea Party was a anti-corporate protest of taxation without representation targeted towards the monopoly on tea held by the East India Trading Company. Today's Teabaggers seem to want to ironically protect corporate profiteering off your healthcare transactions while opposing government spending, but only Obama's spending, not the last 30 years of reckless overspending on defense or government funding of GOP-friendly church groups between 2000 and 2004 in battleground states. Teabaggers are apparently tricked easily to work for the GOP exclusively, or they'd have been protesting Reagan's original $3.5 trillion dollar deficit as it happened, asking for fiscal oversight all throughout the Iraq War or questioned the deregulation and tax cuts for the rich that came at the expense of the middle class as trickle-down economics not only proved fake but destroyed the American economy in the process, leaving this administration no good options.

We can stay a collection of

We can stay a collection of small, separate and ineffectual political movements. Or we can unite into one movement. Lincoln had it right .... united we stand, divided we fall. In a winner-take-all political system, its political suicide to stay as separate movements. We talk of 'Third Parties'. One problem is that we already have a 3rd, a 4th, a 5th, a 6th, a 7th party , etc. No chance of any doing anything useful because of all the divisions. There is substantial agreement among all of these 'outside' parties. In general, all feel that their government has been stolen away by a bunch of crooks. We can solve that problem if we unite. We'll never solve that problem separately. Now, notice all the screaming voices in this thread shouting how no coming together is possible. Then remember that political parties and PR firms hire people to post comments. Could it be that there are people out there who have a vested interest in keeping all the opposition groups divided?

Gus W: Right on, man.

Gus W: Right on, man.

I totally agree with this

I totally agree with this article. He's right in finding common ground with the tea party people. It's a far better option than to allow them to be used by the GOP who only wishes to use them just to get back in power.