Calderon Tries to Turn Out the Lights on Mexico's Unions
Thursday 15 October 2009
by: Michael E. Miller, t r u t h o u t | Report

(Photo Illustration: Troy Page / t r u t h o u t,
Adapted From: erjkprunczyk, Oswaldo Ordóñez (Orcoo),
Ian Koh / flickr)
Mexico City - Every Monday morning for the last 23 years, Ernesto arrived at Luz y Fuerza del Centro, Mexico City's power and light company, ready to work. This Monday, however, he arrived ready to protest.
Late Saturday night, as Mexicans celebrated their national soccer team's qualification for the World Cup, President Felipe Calderòn sent hundreds of federal police to surround Luz y Fuerza. Hours later, he ordered the liquidation of the state-run company, claiming it was financially "unsustainable" due to corruption and waste.
Now Ernesto and 43,000 other Luz y Fuerza employees are out of work. Another 22,000 retirees are wondering what will happen to their pensions.
Controversial and possibly unconstitutional, Calderòn's decree was the first step towards what many Mexicans fear is the privatization of yet another of their country's key industries. But some wonder if the shutdown isn't something larger: a warning to unions across the country to cooperate, or else face elimination.
"This is a war against the unions," Ernesto yelled over the chants of several thousand other protesters in downtown Mexico City. "If you break the Electricians Union, which is the nation's strongest, then all the other unions will eventually fall too. That's neoliberalism."
Calderòn, who belongs to the conservative National Action Party (PAN), has denied that closing Luz y Fuerza represents an attack on Mexico's unions.
"This measure is not, as has been said, a political attack by the government against union life," Calderòn said Wednesday. "I reiterate and will always reiterate my respect for union autonomy and for the lives and working rights of Mexican workers."
Yet, the shutdown came with little warning, following a public spat between the federal government and the union representing Luz y Fuerza workers.
On October 5, Calderòn's administration refused to recognize MartÃn Esparza as leader of the Mexican Electrical Workers Union (SME), which represents Luz y Fuerza del Centro. The federal government cited "irregularities" in SME's recent internal election, which Esparza won for the third consecutive time.
Esparza is an ally of Andrés Manuel Lòpez Obrador, the liberal Partido Revolucionario Democrático (PRD) candidate who narrowly lost the 2006 presidential election to Calderòn amidst charges of voter fraud.
Five days after refusing to recognize Esparza, Calderòn shocked the country by shutting down Luz y Fuerza, handing over the responsibility of providing electricity for nearly a third of the country to another state-owned company, the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE).
Calderòn's administration has called the move a cost-cutting measure, alleging that years of waste and poor service by Luz y Fuerza have hurt the country by driving companies out of the capital.
"Luz y Fuerza del Centro's results are notably inferior compared to organizations that provide the same services internationally and compared to the Federal Electricity Commission," the government said in a statement explaining the shutdown. The government says Luz y Fuerza lost 30 percent of its electricity due to theft and inefficiency.
The controversy comes at a difficult time for Mexico, as debate rages over proposed government austerity programs aimed at alleviating the economic crisis.
Despite predictions that the Mexican economy will contract 7.5 percent in 2009 - the worst contraction since the 1930s - Calderòn has rejected PRD calls for a more aggressive stimulus plan. Instead, he has proposed closing several government ministries as well as a two percent hike in sales tax on nonfood items - a tax hike liberals say will hit the poor the hardest.
Yet, Calderòn has tried to link the decision to shutter Luz y Fuerza with his economic plan, which he says will help Mexico's poor. The president has said repeatedly that the roughly $3 billion in annual subsidies received by Luz y Fuerza is more than the cost of Mexico's Oportunidades anti-poverty program, implying that the savings will be redirected to the poor.
Meanwhile, reports of blackouts are up across the country since Sunday. The newspaper El Universal reports power outages in 32 neighborhoods in Mexico City, as well as in ten nearby cities.
The Electricians Union and the federal government have traded accusations all week long, ranging from charges of SME sabotaging power lines (a claim since retracted by the government) to federal police kidnapping SME members and forcing them to work without pay (a charge denied by the government).
Calderòn's PAN party has largely followed in lockstep with the president's decision, while the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) - returned to power in the July 5 elections - has also supported him. The PRD, however, has filed a petition with the Mexican Supreme Court alleging that since the National Assembly established Luz y Fuerza, not the president, the he never had the power to dissolve it in the first place.
In his televised speech Sunday, Calderòn swore he wasn't privatizing the nation's electricity. But so far, the Department of Energy has said it may only rehire 8,500 Luz y Fuerza employees to help the CFE. Considering that the government originally said that half of Luz y Fuerza's employees were unnecessary, that leaves 13,000 required positions still empty. Where will those jobs come from if not from private companies?
"Calderòn says he's not privatizing us, just turning our jobs over to the CFE," said Ernesto, who declined to give his last name for fear of government persecution. "But the CFE already has lots of private contracts. They're buying their electricity. Just go and ask in the north of Mexico how many private companies are generating electricity."
"It's a backdoor to privatization," he said.
With its petitions for a public debate between Esparza and Calderòn ignored, SME has enlisted dozens of other labor unions and planned a large demonstration for Thursday in downtown Mexico City. If the Luz y Fuerza debacle wasn't already a battle between Calderòn and Mexico's unions, it soon will be.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.
Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!




Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
May I ask, What is
Thu, 10/15/2009 - 22:17 — Anonymous (not verified)I think Calderon's
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 00:58 — eval (not verified)I think Calderon's rationale, as well as his reasons are well presented in the article. The P.A. N. is a completely reactionary party. Its blue color was chosen in solidarity with "the church's" blue color. (on both their logos) Control, (as in all governments) union busting (the unions ARE very corrupt, but so is everything else -there and here-) and sacking the country in favor of corporations (again as is being done here) are the P. A. N.s obvious objectives.
I question the author's
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 02:46 — Carlos (not verified)I question the author's objectivity and his first-hand knowledge of what goes on in Mexico. The fact is that LFC is subsidized by the people of Mexico to the tune of $44,000,000,000 pesos /$3B. USD) because of waste, inefficiency & corruption. Ask MartÃn Esparza, the head of the union how he came to own a ranch replete with hacienda, horses, etc, on a salary of $10,000 pesos ($750 USD) per month. Ask residents of Mexico City & the states of Mexico, Puebla, Hidalgo & Morelos how they feel about the service they received vs. the rates they paid. I've been living in Mexico for over 35 years and am & always have been a union man, but think about it in US terms: Would the people of the US tolerate this situation? Does anyone remember Teamster president Dave Beck or his successor, Jimmy Hoffa? The author says, "Calderòn has rejected PRD calls for a more aggressive stimulus plan." What stimulus plan? The left in Mexico is morally bankrupt, as anyone who knows anything about Mexican politics and is willing to speak objectively will tell you. Truthout needs to check its sources more rigorously.
Living in Mexico, albeit as
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 03:15 — Anonymous (not verified)Living in Mexico, albeit as a foreigner, one can't help feel somewhat guarded about the inclination to automatically sympathize with Luz y Fuerza, although the job loss is appalling. For the Mexican public, electric service is unreliable and disproportionately expensive. While the Mexican government under PRI and now PAN (the party of the Catholic Church) has been so corrupt that you must question Calderon's motives, on the other hand the day to day corruption of most public servants and institutions is epidemic, perhaps because built into the low salaries seems to be the presumption of a steady flow of morbidas. This keeps the wheels turning up to a point, but has thoroughly undermined the integrity of almost all institutions, including the unions and the entire court system. Further reporting on the roots of this conflict is needed, though historically unlikely -- and perhaps dangerous.
The problem is that the
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 04:56 — Miguel (not verified)The problem is that the Calderón's resolution was not supported byeconomical reasons, but political. The Mexican Goverment is in charge of the administration of LyFC. The workers does not have to do with the economical decisions. If LyFC has economical problems is because of the there are a lot of companys, the biggest of Mexico (Televisa, Telmex), and public offices that are excluded from paying the service of LyFC. The corruption of LyFC could be managed without the de liquidation of the company.
When private Banks were declared in bankrupt the mexican govermment aproved a recourse for 552 000 million dollars.
Calderón luquidated LyFC because the workers of that company does not accept the programm for privatization. There are groups of workers with a major degree of corruption that are awarded by Calderon with money, public charges, and different kinds of benefices: Elba Esther Gordillo (SNTE) Deshamps (Pemex), but they are not opressed because they supported the presidential campain of Calderon in 2006.
Any problem with "corruption
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 04:59 — Texas Aggie (not verified)Any problem with "corruption and inefficiency" comes for many reasons. One of the primary, most important reasons is that the police are paid off by people to look the other way when the people hook up directly to the power lines without bothering to go through meters. In other words, a high percentage of the power that was generated never gets paid for. It is somewhat difficult to pay your expenses if your product is stolen from you with the collaboration of the authorities.
This problem came to a head a couple years ago when there was a brown out in the D.F. and the head of the LFC had to defend himself. He had the figures of how much energy they produced and how much they were paid for and the two numbers weren't even close. I can attest to the fact that all the little vendors along the street have wires going directly to the overhead lines. Then there is the problem of the "colonias" where immigrants from the rural areas sort of help themselves to the benefits of water and electricity from the nearby water and power lines. At least in the colonias the Mexicans show their solidarity by seeing to it that almost everyone gets hooked up without the authorities being any wiser.
and we can agreggate that
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 05:00 — Miguel (not verified)and we can agreggate that Calderon has applyed a systematic repression to mexican social movements.
He has not offered justice to the victims of crimes of the past: Tlatelolco 68, Guerra sucia (the extermination of guerrillas); Atenco, Acteal.
Fellow Americans, listen up.
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 05:47 — Anonymous (not verified)Fellow Americans, listen up. You need to learn languages other than English. You need to work to make it possible for your children to master another language.
The word in Spanish for "bribe" is "morDida"--MORDIDA . The fellow who posted that he lives in Mexico and thinks it is "morbida" needs to LEARN SPANISH.
No wonder our "intelligence" agencies do so badly. They don't know the language they need to know. But we are good at killing people.
Frances Griffin
Mexico is based on
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 13:00 — Anonymous (not verified)Mexico is based on socialism. Socialism keeps the poor downtrodden and dependent on the state. There is no incentive to better one's position as entitlement, instead of hard work and keeping what you earn, becomes bred in to every citizen.
Mexico is based on
Fri, 10/16/2009 - 20:36 — Anonymous (not verified)'..Mexico based on
Sat, 10/17/2009 - 03:00 — Anonarcmous (not verified)Mexico Ex-Pats see all kinds
Sat, 10/17/2009 - 13:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Everybody stop and suck it
Sun, 10/18/2009 - 01:40 — Anonymous (not verified)Warm Hearted People always
Wed, 10/21/2009 - 13:29 — Anonymous (not verified)All you Anonymous cowards
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:55 — Frances in California (not verified)