Share

California Readies Expansive New Delta Water Plan

by: Rick Cabral, Truthout | Report

photo
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. (Photo: brothergrimm / flickr)

     An area of land known simply in California as "the Delta" has undergone a rapid decline and this long-term tragedy has spurred state legislators and the governor to take significant measures to save the largest estuary on the Pacific Coast.

     California's Delta is circumscribed by the Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers system. It contains more than 500,000 acres of agriculture, provides habitat for 700 native plant and animal species and supplies water to more than 25 million Californians and 3 million acres of agriculture.

     Legislators this week were presented the 2009 Delta/Water legislative package, a series of bills folded into one large measure known as SBX7-1, submitted by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg.

     Steinberg's bill has the support of a broad coalition of public utilities, environmental groups and other key stakeholders, a tribute to his mediation skills.

     The bill establishes a new legal framework for Delta management, emphasizing the coequal goals of "providing a more reliable water supply for California and protecting, restoring, and enhancing the Delta ecosystem." Moreover, it will reform the policy and governance for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. It redefines the role of the Delta Protection Commission (DPC), creates a new Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy to support efforts that advance environmental protection and the economic well-being of Delta residents and creates the Delta Stewardship Council as an independent state agency.

     The new Delta Council will be required to develop, adopt and commence implementation of the "Delta Plan" by January 1, 2012, with a report to the Legislature due by March 31, 2012. The plan would promote statewide water conservation, water-use efficiency and sustainable use of water, as well as improving water conveyance/storage and operation.

     The Delta Council will act to protect and restore water supplies in concert with The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP), <http://baydeltaconservationplan.com/BDCPPages/planningprocess.aspx> which was already in place, to promote the recovery of endangered, threatened and sensitive fish and wildlife species and their habitats in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. One key factor is the maintenance and restoration of earthen levees, some of which date back two centuries and could be severely impacted by earthquakes in Northern California.

     To ensure enforcement of all the proposed new laws and regulations affecting the Delta, the bill spawns the creation of a new "Watermaster" position, a sort of estuary sheriff within the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).

     Directly affecting all Californians, the legislative package also features a goal of reducing water usage 20 percent statewide by 2020, as conservation is a key component in the bill.

     In addition, the bill would:

     * Add authority/appropriation for SWRCB to hire 25 additional enforcement personnel.

     * Update and significantly change the penalties for illegal diversion.

     * Provide new and increased penalties for violating water rights law and expand SWRCB's authority to enforce existing water rights laws.

     Steinberg's bill has the support of the San Francisco Public Utilities District and Contra Costa Water District - two key constituencies - after they received assurances their historic water rights would be upheld.

     In 2006, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger created the Delta Vision "Blue Ribbon" Task Force, which was chaired by Phil Isenberg, a former 14-year assemblyman and mayor of Sacramento. The task force and its 43-member stakeholder group met for two years, drawing on a large community of scientists who showed that the Delta was unsustainable. Many of the group's recommendations for securing California's water supply and protecting the unique ecosystem were incorporated in the 2009 Delta Water legislative package.

     Legislators this week also submitted a $9.4 billion bond measure that would pay for the programs that will restore the Delta, while funding other water projects within the Golden State.

     The reform measure must garner a simple majority in the legislature, while the bond measure requires a two-thirds approval vote. While California continues to teeter on the brink of financial trouble, the issues surrounding the Delta and the anticipated mitigation costs are certain to impact future state budgets.

     The overarching issue affecting Delta restoration and water conservation is the prospect of a "peripheral canal" that would divert fresh water from the Sacramento River, bypassing the Delta, into a southbound aqueduct. The prospect of a canal is at the center of a long-standing "north-south" debate.

     "A transportation system around the Delta has been on the table in California for over 100 years," Isenberg maintains. "You're talking a 70-year deadlock. In all the time that I've been around, this is the closest I've seen the legislature get a comprehensive set of proposals that address the range of issues (contained in SBX7-1)."

     In 1982, California voters rejected a measure that would have constructed the "peripheral canal." However, lobbyists and legislators have been trying to resurrect the project ever since.

     In his presentation to the joint hearing of the Assembly-Senate water and resources committees earlier this week, Steinberg said, "This process (SBX7-1) ensures there is a more coherent, understandable and inclusive process to determine what the right answers are when it comes to conveyance and the Delta."

     The semantic issue of "conveyance" has prompted supporters of a canal to affirm that the bill allows for it, while environmentalists say it is not expressly included. Steinberg's press aide Alicia Trost reiterated that the canal is not specified in the package. "Nothing in the policy bill or the bond bill authorizes the peripheral canal." The policy bill acts sets up a governance structure to act as a check for the BDCP, which is expected to release its recommendations next year.

     Late Thursday, however, Assembly member Alyson Huber attempted to provide clarity on the issue with the introduction of AB13, which would "prohibit the construction of a peripheral canal ... unless expressly authorized by the Legislature." In addition, the bill - cosponsored by state Senator Lois Wolk - would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to complete an economic feasibility analysis prior to construction of a peripheral canal, and secure assurances that the construction and operation of a canal would "not diminish or negatively affect the water supplies, water rights, or quality of water for water users within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta watershed."

     A vote on this historic legislative package may occur as early as Monday of next week.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

It seems incredible that no

It seems incredible that no one seems to be thinking about the problem of imminent rise in sea level, which in a few decades may drown the whole delta area in salt water. It would be the height of irresponsibility to spend billions on a project that could have so short a life.

Robert Holt is correct about

Robert Holt is correct about the lack of caution and foresight regarding the accelerating rise of sea levels. Do the tidal zones have mangroves at present? If not, then systematic planting needs to take place if this is to become a place where you conserve and sustain to wildlife and biodiversity systems. This will enable the whole Delta system to adjust as sea-level rises, but also create conditions for buffering against incoming storms AND hold back increased amounts of down-coming sediments which will in effect slowly raise the delta levels. The other issue is that I see no sign of there being legislative controls over chemical sprays and pollution into what is supposed to become a rejuvenated conservancy region. Part of the legislation should be a mandatory transformation to wholesale organic, non-toxic chemical agriculture to enable the system to clean itself and increase life-affirming sustainability processes. The freshwater canal idea is fine so long as there is 'water-tight' legislation, and a transparent publicly accountable commission overseeing distribution - so that the needs of Delta bio-diversity systems comes before the sedentary masses in the cities. They can pay for desalination...

this article is out of date.

this article is out of date. the bills have beeb divided up into 7 bills in the assembly and the senate. the bond is now 10.9 billion. Sea level rise mitigation are eligible projects in the bond bill. Sierra Club, the planning and conservation league, friends of the river, the environmental justice coalition for water, and others are opposed to most of the bills in the package. "mandatory transformation to wholesale organic, non-toxic chemical agriculture to enable the system to clean itself and increase life-affirming sustainability processes. " that would be nice, but that wouldn't pass the legislature. not even close.

Several farmers, who were

Several farmers, who were hoping that the project will provide some short-term relief to their water shortages, were frustrated at the plan's timetable and cost. r4 dsi

:Legislators this week also

:Legislators this week also submitted a $9.4 billion bond measure..." There you have the crux of the matter in regards to the decline of California from the Golden State to the Failed State. They cannot stop spending themselves into insolvency!

Truthout is just parroting

Truthout is just parroting the press release that NRDC sent out. Sierra Club, and all homegrown environmental groups, i.e., not Corporate groups are opposed to this very flawed legislation that essentially gives away Northern California Water and the SacDelta to Westside Big AG interests (friends of Schwarzenneger and Feinstein) and Southern California Sprawl. Check out www.restorethedelta.org to find out what real community and enviro groups think, and how you can tell your legislator to vote NO