Share

Hostage-Takers in the Senate

by: Dean Baker, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: kevindooley, daliborlev)

As most of us are preparing for the holidays a small clique in the Senate, with their collaborators in the Washington punditry, are planning for a dramatic hostage-taking event. Their target of opportunity is a bill to increase the nation's debt limit. The hostage-takers propose to obstruct the bill's passage unless the rest of the country gives into their demands to cut Social Security and Medicare and takes other steps to meet their warped sense of fiscal responsibility.

The debt limit must be increased at regular intervals in order to allow the government to function normally because the government is currently operating at a deficit. If the debt limit is not passed, then at some point the government will not be able to pay workers and contractors. It won't be able to send out Social Security checks or make payments for Medicaid and unemployment insurance to state governments. And, it will not be able to make interest payments on government bonds, effectively defaulting on the national debt.

As a condition of allowing a bill to increase the debt limit to pass the Senate, the hostage-takers are demanding that Congress agree to establish a special commission to make recommendations for reducing the long-term budget deficit. This commission would be stacked with people who want to cut Social Security and Medicare.

When the commission makes its report to Congress, which would include huge cuts for these programs along with some tax increases, the report would not be subject to regular Congressional procedures. It would be fast-tracked, which means that it could not be amended, debate would be limited, and there would not be the usual 60 votes required to bring the report to a vote in the Senate. In short, the deck would be stacked toward approving large cuts in ways that would not ordinarily be the case.

The hostage-takers argue that such a commission is necessary because the current system is broken. This is another way of saying that the hostage-takers have been unable to get what they want through the normal democratic process. Rather than trying to organize popular support for their position, like people pushing for health care reform, restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions, or an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, this group of senators and their collaborators prefer the route of hostage-taking. They hope that by threatening the passage of a vital bill, they can advance measures for which they lack public support.

This adventure in hostage-taking is especially infuriating since this gang did so much to push the country into its current economic crisis. At a time when some of us were trying to warn of the housing bubble and the economic disaster that would inevitably follow in the wake of its collapse, this crew was filling the airwaves and newspapers with their scare stories of huge deficits in 2050. Of course, these deficits were driven almost entirely by the cost of maintaining a broken health care system, a point that they rarely chose to highlight.

As a result of the bubble and its collapse, we have enormous deficits today, in addition to 15 million unemployed and tens of millions of homeowners underwater in their mortgage. But the hostage-takers act as though nothing has changed. They acknowledge no responsibility for this disaster and just press on in their drive to gut Social Security and Medicare, two programs that are now more important than ever as a result of the economic mismanagement of the last decade.

The key here is to refuse to give in to the hostage-takers. This is a high stakes game of chicken, but at the end of the day, the hostage-takers, many of whom are financed by Wall Street money, stand to lose far more than the rest of us. None of us should want to see the government defaulting on its debt, but if this crew wants to press the matter, the Wall Street gang will lose much more than those of us who don't possess great wealth.

The Wall Street gang may have suckered us with getting the TARP bailout money last year, but we don't have to let them get away with the same trick again. If they want to threaten to crash the financial system with their irresponsible hostage-taking, then we should steal a line from a former president: "bring it on!"

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Dean Baker is a macroeconomist and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. He previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He is a regular Truthout columnist and a member of Truthout's Board of Advisers.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Wouldn't it be lovely if we

Wouldn't it be lovely if we have a 'Rogue's Gallery' blog, highlighting the evil-doers in Congress who habitually sell their souls to the highest bidder. I would definitely consult such a web site before I vote next time.

If these "deficit hawks" are

If these "deficit hawks" are so worried about our nation's finances, why did they just approve a bill that will give back approximately 33 billion in past tax receipts to the nation's largest corporations? That's a big hit to our Treasury. What hypocrites!

I feel it diminishes the

I feel it diminishes the validity of the report to leave the identity of the "hostage takers" ambiguous. The article is reduced to inuendo of the kind the hostage takers perfected.

Misplaced outrage.

Misplaced outrage.

Misplaced outrage. The

Misplaced outrage. The problem isn't rogues or hostage takers in Congress, the problem is why such decisions are made by Congress rather than by a direct vote of the people. Not that we could change anything by voting in faith-based elections with secret unverifiable vote counts that can by overturned by an unelected Supreme Court, just that it is irresponsible to give people the right to betray us to the tune of trillions of dollars until their term is up and we can choose different thieves. It is time we grew up and stopped complaining about what Congress is doing or not doing, and started doing things ourselves. Direct democracy is an early American tradition. It is We the People, not Congress, who should be voting on wars, budgets, and other issues. We pay for 'em, we get to choose 'em. I don't vote for somebody else to decide what color the car I buy will be or whether or not I should buy a car. When our money is involved, the decisions are rightfully ours.

Why is this article so

Why is this article so vague. If it is real, why can't it name names? And will this be connected to the Health Bill passage?

Name names, damnit! Get

Name names, damnit! Get your HTML codes here!

When are congress and the

When are congress and the president going to stop letting the bullies get away with their two-year-old tantrums and start hitting back? They have the numbers, but they're still trying to reason with spoiled brats who have no inclination to listen to reason. The Republicans and blue dogs are nothing but babies, a bunch of aging infants who have to be stopped if we are ever going to get back on the road to being a democracy again. Responsible people don't let their own children behave that way--why are they allowing it with people they don't like, or even need?

An elderly friend of mine

An elderly friend of mine told me today that "They are going to stop paying for the oxygen," which she uses due to sleep apnea, which could kill her as she sleeps. She lives alone and has no one to monitor her breathing or even "notice" if she stops breathing (which she does without this oxygen device). I suspect that the news story she heard/saw on TV has to do with speculation over this very issue of the debt ceiling bill and the hostage takers who want to cut SS and her Medicare benefits. Would they cut out her oxygen coverage? So, it is not those evil liberals who want to kill her, after all? Hmmmmmm.... This definitely needs to be followed in detail, so that we on Social Security and Medicare know exactly who it is who wants to kill us off and blame it on those nasty liberals and progressives, dontcha think?

Exactly who is threatening

Exactly who is threatening us with cuts in SS and Medicare coverage? Reports are thin and elderly folks here these reports and are scared by them. NAME NAMES. WHO, exactly, has made this "threat"?

Direct democracy. It has

Direct democracy. It has worked so well in California...

Co-sign all the commenters

Co-sign all the commenters who request/demand names of the hostage-takers. I know the billionaire, Pete Petersen wants to gut Social Security/Medicare, and undoubtedly has some "plan" for the money to be diverted to Wall Street so his hedge fund can glom onto as much of it as they can grab away from Government Sachs/Goldman Sucks. But who, exactly are these nefarious whores? Name names -- let's get the campaign rolling to unseat them. How many of them are there? Let's get it all laid out in the open daylight.

A list of names would be

A list of names would be nice. When I here crap like this I want to take action, not just sit around complaining...

As someone else said "

As someone else said " Direct democracy, its worked so well in California". Direct democracy would probably re-institute slavery in the south. It already has denied gay marriage rights every place its been voted on. Property tax laws have decimated the public school system in California due to direct democracy. Any nation that elects Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, twice!, can't be trusted with something so vital as the welfare of social security and medicare. But I agree with others. Who are these "hostage takers"?

If the Republicans are so

If the Republicans are so concerned about the budget, then I am sure they won't mind if we cut the trillion dollar military budget by 50% and increase the taxes on the upper 1% by 50%. Oh, that's right, they are 100% for fascism in America. The upper 1% now owns more than the bottom 95%. The Republicans have their wish, but they still want more! The French Revolution had a solution for these cake eaters. They called it the guillotine. Some Americans call them Freedom Blades.