Share

United States Backs Illegal Elections in Honduras, Betraying Process to Restore Constitutional Order

by: Tom Loudon, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: daliborlev, vredeseilanden)

After five months of political chaos in Honduras, repeated attempts to reach a negotiated agreement for restoration of constitutional order have failed due to the defiant recalcitrance of the Roberto Micheletti coup regime and the complicity of the State Department. Given this impasse and the deepening human rights crisis, it is widely recognized that conditions for holding free, fair and transparent elections on November 29, just days from now, do not exist.

Recognizing this dilemma, in late October the United States rushed a high-level State Department delegation to Honduras, bringing Micheletti back to the table and brokering the October 30 "National Reconciliation Agreement" requiring the reinstatement of President Manuel Zelaya by November 5. However, in a move paralleling the behavior of the Micheletti regime, a few days later, State Department officials reversed their position, stating that the elections would be recognized by the United States with or without restitution of President Zelaya, effectively breaking the accord.

In a press release on November 5, South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint, who had been using a procedural tactic to hold up the Obama administration nominations of Arturo Valenzuela and Tom Shannon, suddenly announced that he was withdrawing the hold because he had reached an agreement with the administration relative to the situation in Honduras: "I am happy to report the Obama administration has finally reversed its misguided Honduran policy and will fully recognize the November 29 elections. Secretary Clinton and Assistant Secretary Shannon have assured me that the US will recognize the outcome of the Honduran elections regardless of whether Manuel Zelaya is reinstated."

A subsequent announcement by Senator Richard Lugar confirms that in fact the United States intends to recognize elections sponsored by the coup regime without prior restitution of Zelaya. Lugar also announced that the State Department is funding election observer missions from the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute.

Lugar also used his statement to encourage Brazil in particular to consider that "recognition of the election will be the only way for Hondurans to look beyond the 5-month-old crisis." Just a few days ago, the Brazilian foreign minister  warned of a "deterioration" of US relations with South America. Brazil is one of 25 countries in the Rio Group which issued a declaration on the same day of DeMint's statement, declaring that this important group of countries will not recognize a government resulting from Honduran elections if Zelaya is not previously restored.

Late last week, President Zelaya announced that he will not accept restitution at this late date in order to not be used to legitimize elections. In a letter to President Obama renouncing the possibility of a return to office in the days prior to the election, Zelaya wrote, "... 3500 people detained in one hundred days, over 600 people beaten and injured in hospitals, more than a hundred murders and countless numbers of people subjected to torture directed against citizens who dare to oppose the regime and express their ideas about freedom and justice in peaceful demonstrations. All this converts the November election into an anti-democratic exercise under an uncertain state of lawlessness with military intimidation for large sections of our people ..."

Zelaya's assessment of the illegitimacy of elections under current condition is shared by large majorities in Honduras and the international community. The broad-based national resistance movement has called for a total boycott of the elections. Participation in the elections has become a kind of ethical litmus test for all candidates. Candidates who run are widely considered to be supporting the coup, placing tremendous pressure on candidates to withdrawal.

The first candidate to withdraw was Carlos H. Reyes, a well-known Independent Party candidate for president and leader of the resistance movement against the coup. His popularity has surged as revulsion to the violence perpetrated by the coup regime has impacted communities and homes throughout the country. Some strategists believe that had a reinstated President Zelaya endorsed Reyes, he could have won the vote, but would have lost due to fraud. After consulting with grassroots assemblies in different parts of the country, Reyes announced his decision to step down.

Last week, the popular Liberal Party mayor of San Pedro Sula announced that he was stepping down as a candidate, in spite of his healthy lead in the polls. Another  110 mayoral and 55 candidates for Congress are reportedly pulling out of the election, and the number continues to grow. Both the leftist UD and the PINU parties are split, with many Congressional candidates stepping down, but the party leadership wanting to stay in the race. These small parties have the most to lose, as they risk losing the position of their party on the ballot.

The UD party has suffered severe criticism for not withdrawing. Their active involvement in the resistance movement morally obligates them to withdraw, but some party leaders see this moment as an opportunity to win more contests than they normally could. However, as the pressure mounts it seems that withdrawal from the elections by the party is imminent, although not yet certain.

With just days to go until the elections, tensions are mounting in Honduras. Micheletti has threatened those encouraging abstention with lengthy prison terms. The resistance movement has called a civic strike for the entire week prior to elections, widespread protests beginning on Friday and a full boycott on Election Day. This comes in a context of heighten levels of state terrorism.

Recently, the military issued a letter to every mayor in the country, instructing mayors' offices to compile lists of inhabitants of the municipality who have been working against the coup. The letter asked for the list to be compiled immediately and stated that each mayor would receive a follow up visit. Mayors who do not comply with this order also risk consequences. This systematic profiling of the population is a blatant violation of human rights and dangerous signal of the levels of repression to come.

In declaring that it will recognize the coup regime sponsored elections on November 29 without prior restitution of constitutional order, the United States has emboldened the coup regime, betrayed a lengthy negotiation process and endangered the lives of millions of Honduran citizens who are committed to democracy, human rights and the rule of law and who will boycott elections they consider to be illegal.
 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
  

»


Tom Loudon is co-director of the Quixote Center in Washington, DC.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

What`s new about the USA

What`s new about the USA government propping up illegal regimes, if not colluding with their criminal activities.

I guess we're gonna bring

I guess we're gonna bring democracy to the rest of the world, except for Honduras. Feels like the 80's all over again, the United States hasn't seen a military coup it didn't like.

Well okay, but... this

Well okay, but... this article raises some of the biggest questions of the US behavior in the Honduras debacle and then ignores them. Why? Why, did the US change its position? Why is the US suddenly endorsing an illegal regime? Is this a return to the 70's and 80's policies of the US being the guiding hand of dictators, murderous regimes and puppet governments? Is this the US' attempt to return South America to chaos and weakness? Maybe if you can get some of those questions answered, we can call this news.

The US has never supported

The US has never supported democracy in the South. The reason why is simple...in the case of Honduras, Zelaya did dangerous things like raise the minimum wage and float the idea of land redistribution. The US is hostile to any governmental initiative that doesn't smack of laissez-faire capitalism, which is why it supports the coup regime. A populace cowed at gunpoint makes for a good investment climate. It's all about protecting and enriching the coffers of the elite, just like in our own country.

I am a missionary living

I am a missionary living here in Honduras, and let me tell you, this article could not be further from the truth. Everything is calm here and even when their were protest at the climax of the situation, we were free to go about and do as we pleased. It is well known that the protesters were being paid $75 each to go out and protest. This election is not illegal, because Mel's removing was legal. The only thing that was not right, and I stress the only thing was that they shipped him out of the country. Aside from that, It was legal for the court to order his arrest. because he defied many laws in this country, and was going to hold an illegal vote.

It doesn't seem far-fetched

It doesn't seem far-fetched to imagine people in the U.S. government supporting a similar transition here in the U.S.

Any type of cooperation or

Any type of cooperation or endorsement of any actions of the illegal government in Honduras amounts to support for the coupe. The hypocrisy of your government is astounding. And yet Americans continue to let your representatives get away with it. Shame!

What do you expect, the

What do you expect, the average 'murican has the education/intelligence level of a fifth grader. They are pretty well on their way to becoming a banana republic themselves. Having been one (American) and now being a Frenchman, am very ashamed of the country of my birth and of what they have become.. America, the rest of the world is really getting to know you and your hypocrisy.. Either get a life and then get an education otherwise you are all road kill..... Just this old Chief's 2¢

As someone who was born in

As someone who was born in Honduras and still has most of his family living there, all I can say is that this article is filled with absolute propaganda and factually-inane nonsense. The people of Honduras rejoice. The people are happy to be free of Zelaya, the wanna-be Chavez-like dictator. He was more unpopular in Honduras than George Bush was in your own country. He even lost the support of his allies in the Congress, a situation that would be like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid turning their backs on Obama. He illegally attempted to fire officials that, Constitutionally speaking, he had no right to fire. He and his thugs stormed into a military facility to illegally recover ballots that were imported from Venezuela, many of which had been pre-filled already(for Zelaya) of course. Regardless of your ideological beliefs, you really need to get your facts straight before spewing a bunch of nonsense that only the most naive and ignorant could possibly buy into.

Also the irony here is

Also the irony here is amazing. America has had a long tradition of meddling in Central/South American affairs, and in the situation of Honduras, Obama jumped in to meddle once again when Zelaya was legally removed, now that the US is pledging to not interfere into sovereign Honduran matters and let the elections go on as planned, now you begin to criticize them for "meddling?" Hilarious!

It is appalling that Tom

It is appalling that Tom Loudon would distort the facts and the truth about the Honduran situation to such a degree; and call the November 29th election illegal. Perhaps you should re-name your journal "Untruth Out".

There is nothing in this

There is nothing in this article that is factually inaccurate or distorted. The human and civil rights situation in Honduras has been well documented by many respected groups. The elected president was deposed and exiled by the military. Prior to that, the elected president was allowed no defense or representation against his accusers at the supreme court or in the legislature. No evidence to back up the charges against him has ever been produced. This situation is a sham and has nothing whatsoever to do with democratic principles. The type of "democracy" promoted by the comments above which defend this coup, and, more particularly, the congressional Republicans who were responsible for this sad disavowal of democratic principles, is clearly described in the second to last paragraph of the article.

Those that deny it is a Coup

Those that deny it is a Coup need to think about why EVERY country in the world has gone on record recognizing this as a Coup. My 11 year old son observed the other day, ¨Now I know why they think of us as a banana republic, we are the only country with a Gorileti as president." Why, because he understands that a democratic country does not kidnap its elected leaders and send them off to foreign countries (yet another consitutional violation!). For those that don't understand, Gorileti is the nickname....of sorts, of Micheletti, the "gorila", who is the head of the coup regime. Every poll which asks about the coup shows that the MAJORITY of Hondurans DON'T support the coup and that MEL ZELAYA has a much higher favorable rate than GORI....whoops, Micheletti. I am referring to opinion polls by Gallup-Cid and others...not exactly lefty organizations! Thanks for the article....the struggle for a more democratic Honduras goes on. Most of us who are anti-golpe are anti-corruption, anti-Intur being tax-free, anti-the privleged classes having immunity to any prosecution even due to drunk driving, killing people, land grabbing, etc. We realize that even among the Resistencia there are leaders who need to step aside as they embody the corruption that persists throughout the political structures of Honduras. May we have a better tomorrow...the elections are basically meaningless, the same political class is going to take power. Change is still a ways away but the Coup has helped most Hondurans ask the right questions. The US has played a pitiful role but they have there own political struggles that played out in Honduras. Same old, same old.....

A few observations if I may.

A few observations if I may. The "missionary" from Honduras writes in the inimitable style of the tea baggers. Here in Mexico we have the same type of "missionary," basically Bushies, and many of their own congregations think that their politics are suspect at best. Believe me, I've been proselytized by them. As for the "legality" of the coup, what kind of Constitution allows a change of government by military coup? Not even the Honduran constitution does that. So supporting an illegal military junta is indeed "meddling," to be polite. As for the Hondurans rejoicing, it is very illustrative to see pictures of the demonstrations for the junta (RayBans and Guccis) vs. the demonstrations against the junta (t-shirts and sandals). And if the people are so happy, why does the military feel it necessary to beat up and kill so many people during demonstrations? I suspect that those who are supporting the coup are getting their news from the American MSM. Those of us getting news from Honduras get an entirely different story. We need to learn from history, but in this case the history we need to learn from is still in the newspapers. During the Reagan administration we backed brutal military dictatorships in Central America and helped them murder peasants and priests and nuns who were trying to help the people. From that we got Ortega and a bunch of narcos in the government of Guatemala (Rios). If we do the same thing in Honduras, there is no reason to expect different results. So why do we do what is plainly morally wrong? If we had leaned on the oil companies in Venezuela to act like decent citizens instead of plundering the country, we wouldn't have Chavez there now. But we didn't. So we got Chavez. Does anyone really think that military governments can keep people down forever?

ITs the"good" old policy

ITs the"good" old policy that says "might is right" all over again, both north and south of the Rio Grande.

The "missionary" supporting

The "missionary" supporting the coup, is not is not a surprise. Latin America has it doses of "missionaries" since the Spanish colonized the continent. They helped to commit atrocities against the Indians leading to their decimation. “Missionaries” and Popes to be have sided with the likes of Pinochet and many other butcher dictators in the region. Central America is full of “missionary’s” “contributions” to “democracy”. Latinos know very well which side those “missionaries” are.

The USA had a bloodless coup

The USA had a bloodless coup in 2000 by the selection of G.W.Bush as president, by the Supreme Court. It was a bloodless military coup because absentee ballots from the military were counted after the voting date.

Funny. I sent a comment on

Funny. I sent a comment on this article and another on the UN's hiring men to advocate for women. None of them were published. Well...that may be the way it is.