Share

Al Gore Still Won't Talk About Meat

by: Mickey Z., t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

photo
(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: JelleS, zen)

Al Gore penned a lengthy New York Times op-ed entitled, "We Can't Wish Away Climate Change," on February 28, 2010. As expected, Gore was wordy, made no effort to discuss the planet's top polluter (US Department of Defense), and, most of all, the former vice president once again opted to ignore the No. 1 cause of climate change: the meat-based diet. In fact, I ran a search on the nearly 2,000 words, but none of the following terms were found: meat, cow, livestock, methane, farm, diet or vegan.

Accepting the (unfortunate) reality that Al Gore is the planet's best-known climate change spokesperson, he has yet again squandered an ideal opportunity to educate, inform and provoke real change. Just as they served burgers and hot dogs at the Gore-inspired Live Earth concerts in 2007, the high-profile, green crowd simply refused to accept the convenient truth: According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, "the livestock sector generates more greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalent - 18 percent - than transport. It is also a major source of land and water degradation."

Yes, it's much more than just climate change. What about the aforementioned water degradation? As the Sierra Club explained, groundwater is "frequently contaminated by factory farm pollution, generally in the form of nitrates. Nitrate pollution, which can cause serious human health problems, seeps out of manure lagoons and into community sources of drinking water."

Let's consider deforestation. "In the Amazon the cattle sector is the largest driver of rainforest destruction, accounting for 60 to 70 percent of deforestation," wrote Nikolas Kozloff, author of "No Rain in the Amazon: How South America's Climate Change Affects the Entire Planet." "To put it in concrete terms: every eighteen seconds on average one hectare of Amazon rainforest is being lost to cattle ranchers. As if the carbon emissions resulting from cattle deforestation were not enough, consider bovine methane emissions."

As a result, the meat-based diet also plays a role in habitat destruction, animal and plant extinctions, world hunger and corporate welfare. Still, since climate change is the eco-topic most familiar to the general public, it may be the ideal place for Al Gore to start this discussion.

As vegan musician Moby explained, omitting the role of animals raised for food from efforts to address climate change is "like talking about lung cancer without talking about cigarettes."

How much longer can the world's best known environmentalist ignore such an issue?

In an open letter to Al Gore, Pamela Rice of the Viva Vegie Society wrote:

We're changing our light bulbs. We're buying high-mileage cars. We're dreaming up new green businesses to reduce the shoe-size of our ecological footprint. But even if we do all of this, a silent trend is working in the background that surely will wipe out all of our gains. We're eating too much meat - meat that from a health standpoint is far in excess. And the world is on a trajectory to double its consumption of meat by mid-century. Indeed, all of our efforts to cut greenhouse emissions will be wiped out if we don't reduce our meat consumption. And people need to hear this from you, Mr. Gore, as the person with the most credibility to get this fact out there. If they hear it from you, they will listen. It is an environmental imperative for humans to reduce their consumption of animal-based foods. 

 Simple Suggestion for Al Gore: A slow, but steady, introduction into his talks and articles regarding the role of the meat-based diet in climate change. You can even use a mainstream source: Henning Steinfeld, chief of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization's Livestock Information and Policy Branch and senior author of the report, who said, "Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today's most serious environmental problems. Urgent action is required to remedy the situation."

Sounds like another Oscar-winning documentary to me ...

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!
Share         

»


Mickey Z. is probably the only person on the planet to have appeared in both a karate flick with Billy "Tae Bo" Blanks and a political book with Howard Zinn. He is the author of 9 books - most recently "Self Defense for Radicals" and his second novel, "Dear Vito." He is a regular writer for Planet Green and can be found on the web at www.mickeyz.net.
 

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

It's better to eat a cow

It's better to eat a cow raised close to you than a veggie burger made from soy grown in Brazil (if you don't live there).

There is no simple correlation between meat consumption and climate change.

Anonymous at 20:20 - Did you

Anonymous at 20:20 - Did you even read the article???

Unfortunately Al Gore knows that if he starts talking about reducing meat consumption, he will be labeled as a fringe nut job type by the general populace, and they will stop listening. The need to reduce meat consumption is just too inconvenient a truth.

Hold on to your shorts! You

Hold on to your shorts! You had better read "THE VEGETARIAN MYTH" by Lierre Kieth and get educated about how silly all of this is...What we really need to do is put all of our animals back on the grass, where they belong,instead of in feed lots. We can then sequester a great deal of the excess carbon in the grassland and stop using the tons of fossil fuel that it takes to grow and carry grain to those animals.

There are lots of truly

There are lots of truly dedicated people who believe in Carbon forced Anthropogenic Global Warming and have modified their lifestyles as much as they can according to their beliefs. I salute them even if I don't agree with them. They talk the talk and walk the walk and are totally deserving of our respect for doing so.

In the meantime ... I'll know that Al Gore has become serious about Carbon when he dumps his private jet, his limos and his monster house and starts leading by example.

I do know a Climeball hypocrite when I see one.

Once-President Al Gore is

Once-President Al Gore is the greatest! He is doing more than I will ever do for this country and the globe, and he is doing it his own way. If you have another angle to pursue to improve things, by all means do it, but don't expect him to be any more than a committed, hard-working, person who as such does not always perfectly conform to his or your ideals. He does pretty good, though, and he doesn't have to do a darn thing for others. If I had his jet, I'd just take it and dive all over the world and look at pretty fish :)

@It's better to eat a

@It's better to eat a cow:

Did you know that cow manure releases methane in large quantities?

And that methane has 50 times the greenhouse effect of CO2?

And where did you get that:

"There is no simple correlation between meat consumption and climate change."

I'm sure it doesn't come from any written source because the formulation you use is flawed from the beginning.

This article is not about the relation between meat consumption and climate change,

But about the relation between different diets' carbon footprints and their overall sizes in the current economy.

You formulate your statement as if the article was stating that climate change was caused by the cattle industry and the hamburger in the American diet.

If you read the article, you find that it states that cattle industry is one of the most important factors in greenhouse gas emissions and by no means the only one.

There's no singling of the agriculture industry, there is just some researched facts about the greenhouse emissions of various diets, their agricultural alternatives and the respective greenhouse gas footprints of these alternatives.

'In the meantime ... I'll

'In the meantime ... I'll know that Al Gore has become serious about Carbon when he dumps his private jet, his limos and his monster house and starts leading by example.'

And this way nobody will listen to him anymore.

And he won't travel around the world to annoy everybody with his climate change.

That's the real goal behind this talking point.

Really, as far as the world

Really, as far as the world ecosystem is concerned, meat is not the problem. The problem is the American way of raising cattle: feeding them on grain in feedlots. You could let buffalo graze on the open plains and harvest them in sustainable numbers. You could raise chickens on small farms. Wild fish--what's wrong with eating them? Vegetarians should set their sights lower--ask to reform farming practices rather than try to provoke guilt over eating habits.

The truth is that meat

The truth is that meat production requires huge resources of water. Water that is becoming very scarce in many regions of the capitalized industrial world. A pound of meat or a glass of water? Take your pick.

Vegan, Omnivore....whatever.

Vegan, Omnivore....whatever. If you eat, breathe, drive or defecate; you are part of the problem. The problem is humans folks. We are degrading the planet quite certainly. Humans are the problem, let's at least acknowledge that.

humans aren't degrading the

humans aren't degrading the planet. this is life. life forms use the resources available. they reproduce until the resources are gone. then their population decreases. making a moral issue out of the impact of homo sapiens on the planet earth is just plain arrogant, foolish, egotistical. we are a life form, and a life form is a life form precisely because it consumes and reproduces.

don't worry so much. in a million years things will look very different. humans will have evolved into something else. the fossil fuels will be gone. life will be very different, but it was pretty different a million years ago.

peace. use up the fossil fuels as quickly as possible so we can end this inane debate once and for all. enjoy the dynamic universe!

What a truly lame

What a truly lame article.
Let me guess: the author lives in the city, grows none of his own food, and thinks that a vegan diet will save the planet.

Let's all watch the film

Let's all watch the film Food Inc. It says nearly all of what needs to be said.

Obviously you didn't read

Obviously you didn't read his new book, Our Choice, which has an entire chapter on agriculture and meat consumption. Get your facts straight before attacking a national hero!

The problem is not the crops

The problem is not the crops being grown or the animals raised, it is their suitability to the specific piece of land, and the way they are raised. On some of the land on my farm it would be stupid and environmentally irresponsible to grow vegetables or grains, but is perfectly suited to raising goats or sheep. Just as I would not insist that this urbanite author eat meat, I find it rude for him to suggest that I not eat meat. Or that he somehow has greater insight into the water it takes for me to raise a cow vs an acre of soy, or the effects on soil and water. Farming everywhere is unique and folks sitting in offices in New York City have no more insight into how I should farm than folks sitting in the Politburo in Moscow did. One size fits all may make city folk like the author happy, but myself and my farmer friends value independence and being unique, and think we have a pretty good idea how to grow food for office zombies to eat.

For more info on meat and

For more info on meat and the global warming, please see:

51percent.org

For more on meat, vegetarianism, the environment, health, ethics, and much else, with many links, check out:

Eco-Eating at http://www.brook.com/veg

I would encourage you to

I would encourage you to read former Vice President Gore's new book, "Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis." In it, among many other topics, he discusses meat production and the implications for carbon dioxide and methane emissions.

In addition, the former Vice President does not have a private jet or a limosine. He does, however own several hybrid-electric vehicles and lives in a Gold, LEED certified home according to US Green Building Council Standards.
Kalee Kreider

You all have it wrong. The

You all have it wrong. The human race needs to stop breeding. Fewer people, less demand. It's really that simple, but NO ONE wants to seriously talk about that topic, the only one that will really effect this planet and it's ability to sustain life.

We want to blame farmers instead for OUR food consumption and climate change, seriously. You demand cheap food, cheap meat, that means GMO and feed lots. STOP blaming the farmer ( and regulating them off their farms and out of a job) and start shouldering the burden you created it.

Not one of you could even begin to farm and raise enough food to sustain your own family. The next time you feel a bit frisky and look at your partner will ideas of passion, maybe you should think about climate change first and trashing this planet. This planet certainly doesn't need another idiot human brought forth to consume it.

I regret--for several

I regret--for several reasons--that I didn't stop eating meat until late in life. I was raised on a family farm and, in hindsight, probably knew even as a child that there was something off about eating animals. Factory farms have taken the process to a whole new, destructive, and even more primitive level. I do wonder if the author watched SNL, because Al Gore mentioned factory farming (in a negative way) on there.

I wasn't going to pause here

I wasn't going to pause here . . . I saw the title and thought to myself: Oh, goody . . . another faux-left Gore-basher; then I glanced thru the comments and found a wealth of new information, in addition to some edifying praise for one of my favorite critters (Al Gore). This is why I read only The Nation and TruthOut (and The Progressive when someone leaves one lying around at KPFK); ONE CAN BECOME AN INFORMED CITIZEN! Thanks all; even the author - one learns things . . .

There is even less reason to

There is even less reason to finger methane (1.8 ppm) for climate changes than there is to suppose CO2 (390ppm) has anything to do with it. "It's the Sun Stupid, New direct evidence demonstrate that changes in solar activity influence climate "by Willie Soon, PhD.solar and climate scientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Look it up.
As long as your information comes from sites which are pushing the AGW Agenda, you are totally misinformed.

Surprise to hear a new

Surprise to hear a new information about Al Gore.Thanks for it.the diet solution program