BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
They're stoked by bitterness, anger, and the unbearable color of others, and they're buying into Donald Trump's trope that the election, indeed society, is rigged against them. At his rallies, they love to wear obscene-laced t-shirts, and when Hillary Clinton's name is mentioned, they come alive with chants of "Lock her up." They revile fact checking and are disgusted, not by Trump's predatory behavior and despicable comments about women, but by the way the media has reported it. And, when the election is over, and Trump has moved on to attempting to build a multi-media empire, or perhaps to an all-expenses-paid Dacha in the Russian countryside, his supporters will be holding a bag of steaming anger.
And the anger of those supporters could make the era of the Tea Party look like, well … a tea party.
A question being batted around these days is: How will the Republican Party deal with its far-right extremists; white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and alt-righters if Trump loses? How will it reckon with the theocratic Christian Right, many of whom – Jerry Falwell, Jr., Dr. James Dobson, Ralph Reed, Tony Perkins, to name a few – were all in with their support for Trump, when they start clamoring for an authentic conservative Christian evangelical candidate in 2020?
In 2013, the Republican Party earnestly issued what was characterized as an "autopsy"; an examination of what wrong in the 2012 presidential election. Party analysts looked at why they lost, and what could be done differently. One of the areas the autopsy focused on was how to improve outreach to minority communities: "We need to campaign among Hispanic, black, Asian, and gay Americans and demonstrate we care about them, too." Questions about how the GOP could become a more inclusive party were asked and discussed.
ECOWATCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUTDAN ZUKOWSKI OF
Article reprinted with permission of EcoWatch
Pedals, the upright-walking bear, which once had 22,000 fans on a now-defunct Facebook page, was just one of 549 bears killed by hunters during a controversial expanded hunting season. Reaction was so negative on both sides of the issue that a Facebook page dedicated to the bear was shut down Saturday night. A new Facebook page, RIP Pedals The Walking Bear, posted a plea to "please be respectful of others."
Anger may have been provoked by the defunct site's post, which read, "The hunter who has wanted him dead for nearly three years had the satisfaction of putting an arrow through him, bragging at the station."
JACQUELINE MARCUS FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Eroding US Pipeline Explosions Reported as "Gas Hikes"
There are approximately, hold on to your seat, 185,000 oil spills and pipeline ruptures that happen every single day in the United States, alone. Reports on these daily disasters are deliberately censored. And now, devastating oil spill impacts are being redefined in the media as "gas hike warnings" instead of environmental disasters.
The federal government has not enforced safety regulations; thus when eroding oil pipes rupture, Big Oil's message is: You, Mr. and Mrs. America, will pay the price with gas hikes. Not only is Big Oil responsible for creating the deadly toxic mess by not upgrading their eroding pipelines, they make hard-working Americans pay for the ruptured pipes by raising gas prices. And if that doesn't tick you off, the oil pipeline industry receives billions of your tax dollars in subsidies.
In September 2016, a main oil pipeline ruptured in Alabama that disrupted supply distribution. The corporate news reported it as a "leak." The chosen word "leak" comes directly out of the oil industry's public relations' lexicon. They instruct politicians, the media anchors, and especially the president of the United States, to use the word "pipe leak". For instance, President Obama still characterizes the worst oil catastrophe in history, the 2010 BP Deep Horizon explosion that killed eleven workers and left 3,000 miles of the Gulf of Mexico's ocean floor a permanent dead zone, "a leak".
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
As Donald Trump and his white nationalist/alt-right supporters stir up his base with anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric, threats of anti-Muslim violence has been on the rise. Which brings us to Kansas, where some militia members are acting out. I wouldn’t call them good old boys because that can be a term of endearment. Besides, they're not really boys, all being in their late forties.
The guys, Curtis Allen, 49, Gavin Wright, 49, and Patrick Stein, 47, apparently decided it was time to take it big time to some Somali immigrants in the town of Garden City, Kansas. Garden City, located in southwestern Kansas, is the county seat of Finney County, and has a population of something over 25,000 people. In addition to Somali immigrants, Garden City is also home to Mexican-Americans, Vietnamese and other Southeast Asians, many of whom work at the Tyson Foods meat packing plant, located about five miles from the city, and other meat packing factories.
From once having a girlfriend working at a meat packing plant in Emporia, Kansas, I know that it's a really tough job: Tough on the hands, tough on the feet, and if you're working the night shift tough on family life.
Allen and Wright, both of Liberal, Kansas, and Stein, of Wright, Kansas are all members of a small "militia" group called the Crusaders, which may be aligned with the “sovereign citizens” movement. They wanted to “wake people up.” And the best way they thought of doing that was to bomb the guck out of an apartment complex that perhaps as many as 120 Somalis live at. And, since one of the apartments in the complex doubled as a mosque, they figured they'd have a mosque notched onto their resume.
All of the planning took place while stalking the apartment complex. Only they weren't very discreet, as they'd drive by and scream at Somali women in traditional clothing, calling them “fucking raghead bitches.”
They set the date; the day after Election Day. They wanted to be sure that their action would not affect the election.
PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
blurted out "that makes me smart" as a reason for non-payment of taxes, he was revealing a truth about the American narcissist. Senator Lindsey Graham was equally arrogant when he stated, "It's really American to avoid paying taxes, legally...It's a game we play.." The game has become very popular, with an incomprehensible three-quarters of Fortune 500 companies stashing profits in offshore tax havens, avoiding over $700 billion in U.S. taxes.
Who Are the Narcissists?
They're people who don't feel any responsibility to the society that made them rich, largely because they believe in the "self-made" myth. Their numbers are growing. For every 100 households with $100 million in assets in 2010, there are now 160.
Some of the super-rich care about average Americans, and some are well-intentioned philanthropists, but in general, as numerous studies have shown, wealthier individuals tend to be imbued with a distinct sense of entitlement. They believe their talents and attributes - genius, even - have earned them a rightful position of status over everyone else.
The narcissists care less about the feelings and needs of others, they become anti-social, they are less generous with their money, they move further to the right, and they become less willing to support the economic needs of all members of society. People in rich countries have been found to express less concern about their environmental impact.
And as the wealth gap widens, people at the two extremes become more and more distrustful of each other.
Most disturbing is that 'upper-class' individuals tend to behave more unethically than average citizens. Especially at the highest levels, where career success has been associated with Machiavellianism -- doing anything necessary to get ahead. A recent study of 261 U.S. senior professionals found that 21 per cent had clinically significant levels of psychopathic traits, compared to about one percent in the general population. That's roughly the same rate as for prisoners.
PROTECT DEMOCRACY FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The 2016 election campaign has left the victims of global capitalism behind.
On one side is Hillary Clinton, the quintessential representative of the financial and political elites, who was temporarily forced into adopting a progressive populist message by her primary opponent, Bernie Sanders. On the other side, there is Donald Trump; a narcissistic con man who was born on third base and insists he hit a home run. By the dictionary definition, I believe Mr. Trump is a sociopath, having no moral judgment, and no ability to empathize or put events into perspective. Mr. Trump’s condition is serious, however, I don't think it is rare.
In fact, Mr. Trump's life of dubious financial dealings is a metaphor for how our unregulated capitalist system has evolved. Success is only measured in terms of accumulated wealth. Executives of large companies are compensated based solely on short-term returns to investors, resulting in cutthroat financial dealings and accounting gamesmanship. Decisions are made in remote boardrooms with no consideration of their social impact.
By most measures, Mr. Trump has been a success in the world of high stakes real estate investing, deal making, and accumulating personal wealth. His path to attaining this wealth has also been a subject of controversy, since Mr. Trump has left a trail of financial dead bodies in his wake; serial bankruptcies, questionable labor practices, legions of unpaid employees and creditors, and some well-publicized scams that were barely, if at all, legal.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Michelle Obama was responding to Donald's Trump's excuse that he was just engaging in "locker room banter" when he boasted about sexual assault in a 2005 "hot mic" videotape with Billy Bush. Later, in the second debate, Trump claimed words were not actions, and he specifically denied ever engaging in such heinous behavior.
However, Michelle Obama was having none of that. She drew a straight line to the heart of the matter when she declared, "I can't believe I'm saying a candidate for president of the United States has bragged about sexually assaulting women." She explained that she was "shaken to the core" by Trump's words and the misogynist nature of his entire campaign:
The fact is that in this election, we have a candidate for president of the United States who -- over the course of his lifetime and the course of this campaign -- has said things about women that are so shocking, so demeaning that I simply will not repeat anything here today. And last week, we saw this candidate actually bragging about sexually assaulting women. And I can't believe that I'm saying that a candidate for President of the United States has bragged about sexually assaulting women.
And I have to tell you that I can't stop thinking about this. It has shaken me to my core in a way that I couldn't have predicted. So while I'd love nothing more than to pretend like this isn't happening, and to come out here and do my normal campaign speech, it would be dishonest and disingenuous to me to just move on to the next thing like this was all just a bad dream.
This is not something that we can ignore. It's not something we can just sweep under the rug as just another disturbing footnote in a sad election season. Because this was not just a "lewd conversation." This wasn't just locker-room banter. This was a powerful individual speaking freely and openly about sexually predatory behavior, and actually bragging about kissing and groping women, using language so obscene that many of us were worried about our children hearing it when we turn on the TV.
It now seems clear that this was not, however, just words. It's one of countless examples of how he has treated women his whole life. And I have to tell you that I listen to all of this and I feel it so personally, and I'm sure that many of you do too, particularly the women. The shameful comments about our bodies. The disrespect of our ambitions and intellect. The belief that you can do anything you want to a woman.
Mark Karlin, Editor of BuzzFlash at Truthout
So frequently the media and people in social and political leadership positions focus on reforming problems on a micro-level, when the problems are actually part of a larger institutional structure. For instance, take the repeated focus on school bullying as an issue. The authors of Bully Nation: How the American Establishment Creates a Bullying Society -- this week's Truthout Progressive Pick, which you can obtain with a donation by clicking here -- helped me understand that if we isolate school bullying from the larger US economic, military, political and cultural systems, efforts to combat it will be doomed to fail. Bullying in our schools is not an exception to our society; it is a consequence of it.
My interview with the authors of the book -- Charles Derber and Yale R. Magrass -- will be published on Sunday on Truthout. In it, the authors trenchantly lay out the conundrum of trying to halt the societal context in which this odious behavior occurs:
Bullying has been a means of controlling people, putting them in “their place,” for perhaps as long as there have been humans. Until about twenty years ago, it was dismissed as “normal,” a rite of passage that children and adolescents must go through and “get over.” Some endure relatively little of it – perhaps they are bullies themselves- and it leaves little long-term impact. For others, it is a trauma that leaves lifelong scars...
We live in militarized capitalism. Capitalism assumes competition -- winners and losers. Militarism requires violence, aggression and submission to authority. Bullying builds these very traits. Psychology is inadequate to understand the cause and power of bullying. Indeed, bullying is about power, and psychology hardly has a concept of power. It is all about individuals changing their attitudes. Sociology and politics are much better at understanding power. 1950s sociologist C. Wright Mills spoke of the “sociological imagination,” where he argued you cannot separate “personal troubles” from “public issues.” We need the sociological imagination to understand bullying -- how are children raised to blend into militarized capitalism? What kind of school system does militarized capitalism need? How do school authorities encourage a student culture which prepares for militarized capitalism and sees bullying as a “normal” part of life?
When you combine extreme capitalism with hyper-militarism, you end up with a culture that is very conducive to bullying. There should be no surprise that schoolchildren and teenagers pick up their cues from the culture at large. This also makes marginalized young people particularly vulnerable to bullying and violence in schools: The bullying of LGBTQ students, for instance, is an especially urgent problem. It is born of a larger cultural context that, in essence, values bullying in how its infrastructure works, even while denouncing it among young people.
JIM HIGHTOWER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Just when you thought that Big Banker greed surely bottomed out with 2008's Wall Street crash and bailout, along comes Wells Fargo, burrowing even deeper into the ethical slime to reach a previously unimaginable level of corporate depravity.
It's one thing for these giants of finance to cook the books or defraud investors, but top executives of Wells Fargo have been profiteering for years by literally forcing their employees to rob the bank's customers. Rather than a culture of service, executives have pushed a high-pressure "sales culture" at least since 2009, demanding that front-line employees meet extreme quotas of selling myriad unnecessary bank products to common depositors who just wanted a simple checking account. Employees were expected to load each customer with at least eight accounts, and employees were monitored constantly on meeting their quotas -- fail and they'd be fired.
That's why the bosses' sales culture turned employees into a syndicate of bank robbers. The thievery was systemic, and it was not subtle: Half a million customers were secretly issued credit cards they didn't request; fake email accounts for online services were set up without customers' knowledge; debit cards were issued and activated without telling customers; depositors' money was moved from one account to another; signatures were forged -- and, of course, Wells Fargo collected fees for all of these bogus transactions, boosting its profits.
ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Values the size of Planet Earth are at stake, as the American presidential election grows ever smaller, ever pettier, ever more certain that rancor triumphs over relevance.
Can you imagine, let us say, an issue the size of global nuclear disarmament emerging in this race, somewhere between the groper tapes and the hacked DNC emails? What if -- my God -- we lived in a country in which such a matter were seriously and publicly discussed, not shunted off to the margins with a grimace and a smirk? The only thing that has mainstream credibility in this country is business as usual, which comes to us wrapped in platitudes about strength and greatness but in reality is mostly about war and profit and the destruction of the planet.
Meanwhile it's three minutes to midnight.
And the Republic of the Marshall Islands has lost its case in the International Court of Justice. On a technicality, no less! Phon van den Biesen, lead attorney for the tiny island nation, which had sued the world's nine nuclear powers -- the United States, Russia, China, Great Britain, France, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea -- to begin real nuclear disarmament negotiations, said the case was dismissed earlier this month on a "microformality," which in my layman's grasp of the matter might be called, instead, a desperate legal copout.