Facebook Slider


Optional Member Code
Get News Alerts!
Tuesday, 04 September 2007 08:59

'GOP hopefuls are staying Bush's course'



'GOP hopefuls are staying Bush's course'

Washington, DC- As presidential campaigning heats up, yesterday's Los Angeles Times takes a closer look at the Republican contenders' failure to articulate a new vision for America and their choice to instead stand in lockstep with President Bush and the failed policies of his presidency. From supporting Bush's stay-the-course approach on Iraq, to backing his opposition to health care for low-income children, to supporting his tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, the GOP candidates are "enthusiastically embracing Bush's major policies and principles."

by Michael Winship

A winter of discontent, some 30 years ago. I was searching for a new job, trying to move from TV publicity work back into journalism. Rupert Murdoch had just bought the New York Post and it occurred to me that he'd probably be looking for a new television critic. The guy the paper employed prior to Murdoch's $30 million purchase had been writing about broadcasting since the days when folks tuned in radio signals with crystal diodes and a cat's whisker.

by Kevin J. Keefe

Don't be so sure that the Inspector General's investigation into Gonzales will be a whitewash. When Gonzales wanted to sweep the US Attorney firings under the rug, he assigned it to the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), rather than the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Why?



Mr. President, let me begin by saying what could come as a surprise to some of my colleagues. Personally, I like Jim Nussle. We came to Washington together and I worked with him for 16 years in the House of Representatives. He's smart. He is passionate.


The real truth in black and white from boots on the ground: “ARWA DAMON, CNN CORRESPONDENT: I was speaking with the spokesman for the Iraqi government who himself fully admits that Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki doesn't have any power, that the power lie was the political parties and they maintain their power based on the size of their militia. There is a lot of speculation about how long this government can actually last in its current shape and form. It is put simply paralyzed. It cannot function … The very building blocks upon which this government was formed are what is leading to its current state of paralysis.” And then from Middle Eastern analyst: “NIR ROSEN, NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: There is no government to begin with. It's a collection of militias. ... there is no alternative. The whole focus on the government in Baghdad is the -- problem is that … In Iraq it used to be you could have a coup replace the government and the whole country followed. But now Iraqi is a collection of city states, Baghdad, Tikrit, Kirkuk, Mosul, Basra, Avril (ph), each one with its own warlords. They don't answer to Baghdad. Baghdad has no control over them. When we overthrew Saddam, we imposed one dictator after another. We didn't like Prime Minister (INAUDIBLE) so we got rid of him and we put in his close ally, Maliki. And now the occupier is once again upset that the occupied people are not being sufficiently obedient. … We are past that stage. Iraq doesn't exist as a state anymore. The government has never existed. It has never brought in any services. Even the most fundamental service the government can provide, a monopoly over the use of violence, it doesn't provide that because it has never controlled the militias and militias are the ones that control the police and the army.”

Tuesday, 04 September 2007 03:51

Poor Bush, poor Tony Snow (sneer)


Bush and Tony Snow seem to think they are broke.

But let me explain. The "median" income in America is NOT the same as the "average" income.

Tuesday, 04 September 2007 03:35

Will Durst: Republicans Gone Wild 2

Written by
If you're one of the millions still rolling on the floor in amazement at the greed and hypocrisy featured in last year's surprise hit: "REPUBLICANS GONE WILD," throw that DVD away. Because you're not going to believe the extreme and hilarious action we've compiled for you in the brand new "REPUBLICANS GONE WILD 2."

My wife, over coffee, admitted finding it odd
That cheating Sen. Vitter said he was forgiven by God

But, Kathy noted, without being the least bit vague,
Why couldn't that option have been used by Sen. Craig?

by Micah Tillman

A recent search of the headlines revealed that talk, not action, has become news to the mainstream media. "Former NJ Governor's Wife Recalls Ordeal." "In Book, Bush Peeks Ahead to His Legacy." "As 9/11 Draws Near, a Debate Rises: How Much Tribute Is Enough?" "In Georgia, Voices of Reassurance." "2nd Retired British General Slams US."

The only thing that separates this "news" from high school gossip is the fact that talk by nationally significant people might predict nationally significant action. But is news now about speculation, not fact? How can something that hasn't happened be news? It isn't even new yet.

Does it really (at this incredibly late date)
Still in any genuine way remain at all wise
To have to pass along the hooey that his
Trip to this war torn country is a "surprise?"

Page 1215 of 1514