Monday, 20 October 2014 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG
  • The Shell Game of Contingent Employment

    When subcontractors, freelancers and independent contractors get hurt or abused on the job, these workers are finding it harder to hold employers accountable. This is no accident - it's a direct result of a neoliberal labor agenda.

  • Paying the Price of Tar Sands Expansion

    Despite all the reasons to keep tar sands in the ground, the refining equipment tax credit has helped put tar sands development in the US on the rise, accelerating climate change at the expense of US taxpayers.

Occupying Different Worlds: NATO and Its Citizens

Sunday, 20 May 2012 13:02 By JA Myerson, Truthout | Report

Truthout has been covering the antiwar movement closely for more than ten years. Click here to help us keep doing this work!

NATO protestors in Chicago, May 19, 2012. (Photo: Zach Roberts / GregPalast.com)NATO protestors in Chicago, May 19, 2012. (Photo: Zach Roberts / GregPalast.com)“Health care, not warfare!” was the slogan of the sizzling hot day Saturday as hundreds of protesters flooded the tranquil tree-lined street where sits 4228 North Hermitage Ave., the residence of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. At issue was the Mayor’s recent decision to close six of twelve city mental health clinics because of a budget crisis that is not so severe as to prohibit the city from spending tens of millions of dollars to host this weekend’s NATO summit.

Michael Hastings, author of The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan, was among the many journalists at the event. For him, this critique is key. “We’re spending $700 billion a year on defense,” he told me. “We spent $120 billion in 2011 in Afghanistan. The takeaway I got from the protesters was that this money could be better spent at home than on these different foreign policy adventures. The adventures have turned out not to be very beneficial for most Americans or most Afghans either.”

In fact, the bind Afghans will find themselves in after American withdrawal will be a central topic of discussion inside the halls of the NATO summit. “Forget protests,” MSNBC gratuitously advised. “NATO summit’s problem is Afghanistan.” There, as in the United States, human well-being is subordinated well beneath wealthy interests’ drive to accumulate capital.

Two years ago, the U.S. discovered nearly $1 trillion in previously unknown iron, copper, cobalt, gold and lithium deposits in Afghanistan, which General David H. Petraeus, then commander of U.S. Central Command, hailed as showing “stunning potential.” The Afghan Ministry of Mines has developed a “Business Plan for an “Investor Friendly Environment” in which the ministry will “[improve] private sector’s access to Afghanistan’s mineral resources” and “enable and facilitate domestic and international private investment with the same rules for all.” Given the festering cesspool of corruption that constitutes Afghanistan’s government and ownership class, the last claim is somewhat dubious.

Shockingly, though, the international community is having a very difficult time coming up with money to support Afghanistan’s efforts to recover from the decade of ruin to which the American military occupation has relgated the impoverished country. The U.S. is set to pledge $2 billion per year to this effort – compare this to the $100 billion per year that the U.S. spent to maintain its recent military surge – and this is so far the world’s largest pledge.

“In many ways, the [NATO] summit is kabuki theater,” said Hastings. “Many of these decisions have already been made, and this is the symbolic effort to show that there’s a consensus about what to do in Afghanistan.”

The international negotiations around the minutiae of that consensus will take place within the parameters of a very narrow ideological outlook that essentially affirms the desirability of NATO’s cooperation in the project of global U.S. military hegemony. The only people in Chicago who will be providing an alternative vision for American foreign policy will be the protesters, barred from entry into the discussions. “Broadly, I think it’s very fair to say that those attending the summit and those protesting on the streets are operating in completely separate spheres,” according to Hastings, who also said that these summits are held “in a bubble…and that’s intentional. That’s why there’s heavy police presence.”

That presence got especially heavy last night, as Chicago police beat protesters with clubs and bikes, plowed into a group of protesters in a van, and surrounded the vehicle of livestream journalists Tim Pool and Luke Rudkowski  who were cuffed and interrogated by police with guns drawn.

This article may not be republished without permission from Truthout.

JA Myerson

J.A. Myerson is a reporter for Truthout and Citizen Radio.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Occupying Different Worlds: NATO and Its Citizens

Sunday, 20 May 2012 13:02 By JA Myerson, Truthout | Report

Truthout has been covering the antiwar movement closely for more than ten years. Click here to help us keep doing this work!

NATO protestors in Chicago, May 19, 2012. (Photo: Zach Roberts / GregPalast.com)NATO protestors in Chicago, May 19, 2012. (Photo: Zach Roberts / GregPalast.com)“Health care, not warfare!” was the slogan of the sizzling hot day Saturday as hundreds of protesters flooded the tranquil tree-lined street where sits 4228 North Hermitage Ave., the residence of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. At issue was the Mayor’s recent decision to close six of twelve city mental health clinics because of a budget crisis that is not so severe as to prohibit the city from spending tens of millions of dollars to host this weekend’s NATO summit.

Michael Hastings, author of The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America’s War in Afghanistan, was among the many journalists at the event. For him, this critique is key. “We’re spending $700 billion a year on defense,” he told me. “We spent $120 billion in 2011 in Afghanistan. The takeaway I got from the protesters was that this money could be better spent at home than on these different foreign policy adventures. The adventures have turned out not to be very beneficial for most Americans or most Afghans either.”

In fact, the bind Afghans will find themselves in after American withdrawal will be a central topic of discussion inside the halls of the NATO summit. “Forget protests,” MSNBC gratuitously advised. “NATO summit’s problem is Afghanistan.” There, as in the United States, human well-being is subordinated well beneath wealthy interests’ drive to accumulate capital.

Two years ago, the U.S. discovered nearly $1 trillion in previously unknown iron, copper, cobalt, gold and lithium deposits in Afghanistan, which General David H. Petraeus, then commander of U.S. Central Command, hailed as showing “stunning potential.” The Afghan Ministry of Mines has developed a “Business Plan for an “Investor Friendly Environment” in which the ministry will “[improve] private sector’s access to Afghanistan’s mineral resources” and “enable and facilitate domestic and international private investment with the same rules for all.” Given the festering cesspool of corruption that constitutes Afghanistan’s government and ownership class, the last claim is somewhat dubious.

Shockingly, though, the international community is having a very difficult time coming up with money to support Afghanistan’s efforts to recover from the decade of ruin to which the American military occupation has relgated the impoverished country. The U.S. is set to pledge $2 billion per year to this effort – compare this to the $100 billion per year that the U.S. spent to maintain its recent military surge – and this is so far the world’s largest pledge.

“In many ways, the [NATO] summit is kabuki theater,” said Hastings. “Many of these decisions have already been made, and this is the symbolic effort to show that there’s a consensus about what to do in Afghanistan.”

The international negotiations around the minutiae of that consensus will take place within the parameters of a very narrow ideological outlook that essentially affirms the desirability of NATO’s cooperation in the project of global U.S. military hegemony. The only people in Chicago who will be providing an alternative vision for American foreign policy will be the protesters, barred from entry into the discussions. “Broadly, I think it’s very fair to say that those attending the summit and those protesting on the streets are operating in completely separate spheres,” according to Hastings, who also said that these summits are held “in a bubble…and that’s intentional. That’s why there’s heavy police presence.”

That presence got especially heavy last night, as Chicago police beat protesters with clubs and bikes, plowed into a group of protesters in a van, and surrounded the vehicle of livestream journalists Tim Pool and Luke Rudkowski  who were cuffed and interrogated by police with guns drawn.

This article may not be republished without permission from Truthout.

JA Myerson

J.A. Myerson is a reporter for Truthout and Citizen Radio.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus