Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Administration Ends Health Care Waiver Program

Washington – The Obama administration is ending a controversial program that allowed employers to avoid a key requirement of the new federal health care law. Beginning in September, employers that offer health coverage to their workers will no longer be able to seek a waiver from rules mandating that their plans provide at least $1.25 million worth of coverage annually. The law was designed to eliminate plans with low annual limits, often called mini-med plans, that critics said offered little protection to customers. The plans typically capped how much medical care they covered in a year at as little as a few thousand dollars. This year, employers were banned from offering plans with annual limits below $750,000. That limit rises to $1.25 million in September and will rise again a year later. In 2014, plans will be prohibited from placing any annual limits on coverage of essential benefits.

Washington – The Obama administration is ending a controversial program that allowed employers to avoid a key requirement of the new federal health care law.

Beginning in September, employers that offer health coverage to their workers will no longer be able to seek a waiver from rules mandating that their plans provide at least $1.25 million worth of coverage annually.

The law was designed to eliminate plans with low annual limits, often called mini-med plans, that critics said offered little protection to customers. The plans typically capped how much medical care they covered in a year at as little as a few thousand dollars.

This year, employers were banned from offering plans with annual limits below $750,000. That limit rises to $1.25 million in September and will rise again a year later. In 2014, plans will be prohibited from placing any annual limits on coverage of essential benefits.

Many employers complained after the health care law was passed last year that raising annual limits would force them to raise premiums, making their health plans unaffordable for employees.

Fearing that many workers would lose even subpar coverage, the administration responded by allowing companies to apply for waivers from the rule if they could show that the annual limit requirement would substantially increase premiums.

Truthout is able to confront the forces of greed and regression only because we don’t take corporate funding. Please support us in this fight: make a tax-deductible donation today.

As of this week, the administration had granted waivers to 1,433 plans covering more than 3 million workers, according to the Department of Health and Human Services.

That represents about 2 percent of Americans covered by private health plans.

Steve Larsen, who oversees the federal waiver process, said Friday that the administration decided to stop taking new waiver applications after concluding that most plans that would need waivers already had applied for them.
“We think this is the best glide path going forward to allow folks who are in these policies to continue that coverage. We want them to be able to continue it,” Larsen said. “But we really don't expect significant premium increases for the remaining plans.”

Employers that already have waivers would be able to apply for renewal this September, he said.

Ending the waiver process also eliminates a political headache for the administration as President Barack Obama ramps up a re-election campaign in which he will have to defend the new health care law.

Republicans had seized on the waivers as evidence that the law was unworkable. And hinting at political favoritism, they charged that the administration was concealing which employers were denied waivers.

An independent report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office this week found no evidence to support the GOP charge, concluding instead that employers that were denied waivers did not show that the annual limit requirement would substantially increase premiums.
Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, nonetheless kept up their criticism.

“The Democrats instituted the waiver program to cover up the fact that their failed law would increase costs and force people out of the plan they have and like,” Camp and Hatch said in a joint statement.

“Now they are shutting it down because it's become clear that the only way to keep what you have and like is to be exempted from the very law they said would lower costs,” they said.

Larsen said political considerations did not play a role in the administration's decision.

“We looked at the data and concluded this was the appropriate course of action without any reference to … whatever criticisms or comments are being made about the program,” he told reporters.

Officials at the National Federation of Independent Business and the Retail Industry Leaders Association declined to comment about the administration's decision.

© 2011 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

Join us in defending the truth before it’s too late

The future of independent journalism is uncertain, and the consequences of losing it are too grave to ignore. To ensure Truthout remains safe, strong, and free, we need to raise $50,000 in the next 10 days. Every dollar raised goes directly toward the costs of producing news you can trust.

Please give what you can — because by supporting us with a tax-deductible donation, you’re not just preserving a source of news, you’re helping to safeguard what’s left of our democracy.