Skip to content Skip to footer

Fix Schools First, Say Charter Teachers

Charter school teachers in Philadelphia are speaking out against their employer taking over another school while ignoring teachers at existing schools.

Charter school teachers in Philadelphia are speaking out against their employer taking over another school while ignoring teachers at existing schools.

Instead of supporting management’s expansion plans, they’re making common cause with parents at the targeted school, Luis Muñoz-Marín Elementary. The teachers want to unionize in the charter teacher local of the AFT.

Aspira charter chain teachers rallied in the pouring rain at the company’s Philadelphia headquarters on Wednesday. For over a year they have been clashing with the chain, seeking union recognition and a role in school decisions.

“I just feel like they are not in a position to grow,” said Hanako Franz, a teacher at Aspira’s Olney High School. The teachers have been phone banking Marín parents to discuss concerns that Aspira schools leave parents and teachers out of decisions.

Teachers have filed four unfair labor practices against Aspira, including one against the chain for barring teachers from criticizing their school online. Aspira got rid of that policy as a result of the charge.

Teachers are asking management not to interfere with the union drive and for union recognition if a majority sign up. This is similar to what teachers at charter chain UNO won in Chicago last year.

Delayed Vote

The state-appointed School Reform Commission closed 23 schools last year, and cut school funding in remaining schools despite protests from teachers, parents and community groups. Meanwhile nine new charters opened. Marín is one of two conversions announced this year.

In response to the protests, the Reform Commission offered parents a vote: let Aspira run your school and get added funding from the district, or get no extra funding for what the Commission calls an “underperforming” school.

“It’s a false choice, especially when budgets are so crunched,” Franz said.

After parent opposition increased, the Commission informed parents their vote would only be advisory, and then put off balloting until June. Activists expect Aspira to use the extra time to wear down parents and get them to accept the takeover.

“We have so many parents are so upset about this,” said Maria Cruz, a Marín parent and president of the local school advisory council. She said she’s worried the charter won’t work with Marín’s special needs students, since charter schools often don’t.

She’s also concerned about the effect on students when teachers are replaced. (If the charter takes over, all teachers must reapply for their positions.) And she said Aspira makes parents pay extra fees for uniforms and other materials.

Teachers denounced the chain for leaving them out of decisions. “Having things run by people who aren’t teachers or parents is not going well,” teacher Sarah Apt said. Apt joined Aspira three years ago, excited to teach at a school that had an emphasis on bilingual education. But it’s not clear who’s making policy at Aspira schools, she said, and they are not listening to feedback from teachers. “Our students get constantly moved around” she said, describing disruptive changes each year in how students are divided up and how class time is structured.

Resisting the union and stifling free speech go against the organization’s stated mission, Franz said. Aspira started as a community organization, founded by Puerto Rican bilingual education activist Antonia Pantoja, to decrease the dropout rate among Puerto Rican and Latino youth. Now it runs five schools in Pennsylvania and more in New York and Illinois.

The advisory vote is June 5. Cruz and other parents who are opposed to the takeover want to vote sooner to send a message to the school district. Meanwhile, they are petitioning to oppose the takeover.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $18,000 before midnight to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?