Tuesday, 28 March 2017 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG

DO YOU SUPPORT INDEPENDENT NEWS?


If you visit Truthout daily, weekly or even once a month, now's the perfect time to make a contribution towards real journalism.

Click here
to donate.

Vote November 4: Defeat Suppression of Minorities, Youth, Workers

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 By Robert Weiner and Joseph Abay, The Michigan Chronicle | News Analysis
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print

Two riveting developments October 8 strike at the heart of Americans’ right to vote and minorities’ abilities to have fair power.

A report by the US Government Accounting Office requested by five senators (Sanders, Leahy, Durbin, Schumer, Nelson) found that minority turnout was reduced 2-3% in states with ID laws—despite no ID fraud—because of the cost of procuring the ID’s. Close elections were clearly at risk. GAO found that “the falloff was greatest among African Americans, young people, and newly registered voters.”

Likewise on October 8th, The Supreme Court voted 7-2 (with dissents from Ginsburg and Sotomayor) overturning the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that would have reinstated same day registration and students’ out-of-precinct voting in North Carolina. This ruling has added North Carolina to the already long list of 22 other states with Republican governors and legislatures that have enacted voter restriction laws across the nation. These laws will take a massive toll unless the courts reverse them or the victimized rebel in large numbers and find a way to the polls.

Given the Supreme Court’s attitude, there will not be time for the former before the November 4 Election Day clock ticks down—so standing in lines again to have voices heard – which worked in 2012 and 2008 — may again be the only answer to stop a right-wing takeover of the Senate and massive progressive losses in the House.

“Voter fraud” legislation curtailing voting when no fraud has occurred has become the staple of the Republican agenda. They were helped by the 2013 Shelby V. Holder decision. The conservatives on the Supreme Court gave a 5-4 decision against Attorney General Eric Holder, invalidating Section 4 of the Voting Right Act. The statute had mandated federal government ‘preclearance’ in regards to changes to state election laws. This legislation was essential in preventing African American disenfranchisement. George W. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts decreed that we now live in a ‘post-discrimination’ society, despite congress almost unanimously finding the opposite when it passed and amended the law.

Following the court’s ruling, Republican governors and legislatures ran wild. 93 restrictive voting bills were introduced in 33 states; 22 states have passed them, and counting. On September 29th, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, the #2 House Democrat, contended that “Republicans around the country are trying to make it more and more difficult for people to vote, because their premise, which is accurate in my opinion, is if everyone votes, Democrats win.” Pennsylvania had passed a law in 2012, and Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai said: “Voter ID is going to allow Gov. Romney to win Pennsylvania–done.” Not quite—the Pennsylvania courts overturned it. Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz openly admitted voter suppression is directly linked to giving conservatives more power over “abortion, gay marriage, and a whole lot of social issues we care deeply about.”

Republicans present voter fraud as a pervasive problem, something that any fact-checking shows is not true. Between 2002 and 2012, out of a total of 600 million votes cast, only 10 cases of voter impersonation were reported. Any “fraud” has amounted to only 0.00000344666% of all votes cast. Why do Republicans love voter ID laws? They disproportionally affect African American voters, a critical Democratic Party voting bloc. African Americans account for 25% of Americans eligible to vote without Photo ID, while white voters account for only 8%.

Holder avowed that the Justice Department will combat voter suppression state legislation “that seeks to take advantage of the Supreme Court’s (2013) ruling.” Regrettably, his resignation on September 25 this year could prove disastrous for the federal lawsuits battling vote rigging “laws”, if his successor is not as dedicated to the cause as Holder.

Michigan is not exempt from voter “fraud” legislation; a Republican-passed amendment requires ID at the polls, but voters can avoid the ID if they swear and sign an affidavit there affirming their identity. The Republican legislature also passed two bills to require photo ID’s to pick up absentee ballots, cast an Election Day ballot and force citizens to sign paperwork affirming they are American citizens before getting a ballot. Even Republican Governor Rick Snyder considered the additional legislation “confusing” for voters (and knew it would backfire on him politically), resulting in him vetoing the latest bills. Republican legislators will attempt to push through voter “fraud” legislation in the future.

On October 9th, a US Federal Court ruled against Texas, stating that the legislation created “an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics5 and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose.”

The ruling was a victory for the Justice Department, who had filed the lawsuit against Texas law because they considered it “stringent and burdensome” for requiring ID’s to vote, and said it was “motivated by discriminatory intent” and “anti-immigrant rhetoric.” Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez had called into question the law’s disproportional effect on Latino voters, noting that “a Hispanic registered voter is at least 46.5 percent more likely than a non-Hispanic registered voter to lack this identification.” The law also prevented college students from using their student ID at the polls. Texas did allow citizens to vote using their gun license – obvious pandering to the right-wing NRA.

Ohio’s Republican legislature eliminated early week voting known as Golden Week. The legislation also ended early voting two Sundays before the election, used heavily by minority voters and church turnout drives like “Souls for Polls.” Following a September 29 court decision, voting on the last two Sundays before Election Day was eliminated and the early voting period reduced from 35 days to 28
Early voting is used greatly by minorities and working class families. During the 2012 election, 19.9% of Ohio’s black voters voted early, while only 6.1% of whites did. American Sociological Review Editor Vincent J. Roscigno stated, Black Ohioans’ income is 60% of that for whites, and Black Ohioans are more likely to have longer hours, less pay and less freedom to take time off.

The right wing is attempting to rig and steal the election. The most assured way to express anger about voter suppression is to show up on Election Day.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Joseph Abay

Joseph Abay is senior policy analyst for Robert Weiner Associates and Solutions for Change.

Robert Weiner

Robert Weiner is a former spokesman for the Clinton and Bush White Houses, the US House Government Operations Committee, and senior staff for Representatives John Conyers, Claude Pepper, Charles Rangel, Ed Koch, and Sen. Edward Kennedy.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES
Optional Member Code

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Vote November 4: Defeat Suppression of Minorities, Youth, Workers

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 By Robert Weiner and Joseph Abay, The Michigan Chronicle | News Analysis
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print

Two riveting developments October 8 strike at the heart of Americans’ right to vote and minorities’ abilities to have fair power.

A report by the US Government Accounting Office requested by five senators (Sanders, Leahy, Durbin, Schumer, Nelson) found that minority turnout was reduced 2-3% in states with ID laws—despite no ID fraud—because of the cost of procuring the ID’s. Close elections were clearly at risk. GAO found that “the falloff was greatest among African Americans, young people, and newly registered voters.”

Likewise on October 8th, The Supreme Court voted 7-2 (with dissents from Ginsburg and Sotomayor) overturning the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that would have reinstated same day registration and students’ out-of-precinct voting in North Carolina. This ruling has added North Carolina to the already long list of 22 other states with Republican governors and legislatures that have enacted voter restriction laws across the nation. These laws will take a massive toll unless the courts reverse them or the victimized rebel in large numbers and find a way to the polls.

Given the Supreme Court’s attitude, there will not be time for the former before the November 4 Election Day clock ticks down—so standing in lines again to have voices heard – which worked in 2012 and 2008 — may again be the only answer to stop a right-wing takeover of the Senate and massive progressive losses in the House.

“Voter fraud” legislation curtailing voting when no fraud has occurred has become the staple of the Republican agenda. They were helped by the 2013 Shelby V. Holder decision. The conservatives on the Supreme Court gave a 5-4 decision against Attorney General Eric Holder, invalidating Section 4 of the Voting Right Act. The statute had mandated federal government ‘preclearance’ in regards to changes to state election laws. This legislation was essential in preventing African American disenfranchisement. George W. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts decreed that we now live in a ‘post-discrimination’ society, despite congress almost unanimously finding the opposite when it passed and amended the law.

Following the court’s ruling, Republican governors and legislatures ran wild. 93 restrictive voting bills were introduced in 33 states; 22 states have passed them, and counting. On September 29th, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, the #2 House Democrat, contended that “Republicans around the country are trying to make it more and more difficult for people to vote, because their premise, which is accurate in my opinion, is if everyone votes, Democrats win.” Pennsylvania had passed a law in 2012, and Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai said: “Voter ID is going to allow Gov. Romney to win Pennsylvania–done.” Not quite—the Pennsylvania courts overturned it. Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz openly admitted voter suppression is directly linked to giving conservatives more power over “abortion, gay marriage, and a whole lot of social issues we care deeply about.”

Republicans present voter fraud as a pervasive problem, something that any fact-checking shows is not true. Between 2002 and 2012, out of a total of 600 million votes cast, only 10 cases of voter impersonation were reported. Any “fraud” has amounted to only 0.00000344666% of all votes cast. Why do Republicans love voter ID laws? They disproportionally affect African American voters, a critical Democratic Party voting bloc. African Americans account for 25% of Americans eligible to vote without Photo ID, while white voters account for only 8%.

Holder avowed that the Justice Department will combat voter suppression state legislation “that seeks to take advantage of the Supreme Court’s (2013) ruling.” Regrettably, his resignation on September 25 this year could prove disastrous for the federal lawsuits battling vote rigging “laws”, if his successor is not as dedicated to the cause as Holder.

Michigan is not exempt from voter “fraud” legislation; a Republican-passed amendment requires ID at the polls, but voters can avoid the ID if they swear and sign an affidavit there affirming their identity. The Republican legislature also passed two bills to require photo ID’s to pick up absentee ballots, cast an Election Day ballot and force citizens to sign paperwork affirming they are American citizens before getting a ballot. Even Republican Governor Rick Snyder considered the additional legislation “confusing” for voters (and knew it would backfire on him politically), resulting in him vetoing the latest bills. Republican legislators will attempt to push through voter “fraud” legislation in the future.

On October 9th, a US Federal Court ruled against Texas, stating that the legislation created “an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics5 and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose.”

The ruling was a victory for the Justice Department, who had filed the lawsuit against Texas law because they considered it “stringent and burdensome” for requiring ID’s to vote, and said it was “motivated by discriminatory intent” and “anti-immigrant rhetoric.” Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez had called into question the law’s disproportional effect on Latino voters, noting that “a Hispanic registered voter is at least 46.5 percent more likely than a non-Hispanic registered voter to lack this identification.” The law also prevented college students from using their student ID at the polls. Texas did allow citizens to vote using their gun license – obvious pandering to the right-wing NRA.

Ohio’s Republican legislature eliminated early week voting known as Golden Week. The legislation also ended early voting two Sundays before the election, used heavily by minority voters and church turnout drives like “Souls for Polls.” Following a September 29 court decision, voting on the last two Sundays before Election Day was eliminated and the early voting period reduced from 35 days to 28
Early voting is used greatly by minorities and working class families. During the 2012 election, 19.9% of Ohio’s black voters voted early, while only 6.1% of whites did. American Sociological Review Editor Vincent J. Roscigno stated, Black Ohioans’ income is 60% of that for whites, and Black Ohioans are more likely to have longer hours, less pay and less freedom to take time off.

The right wing is attempting to rig and steal the election. The most assured way to express anger about voter suppression is to show up on Election Day.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Joseph Abay

Joseph Abay is senior policy analyst for Robert Weiner Associates and Solutions for Change.

Robert Weiner

Robert Weiner is a former spokesman for the Clinton and Bush White Houses, the US House Government Operations Committee, and senior staff for Representatives John Conyers, Claude Pepper, Charles Rangel, Ed Koch, and Sen. Edward Kennedy.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus