Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Indigenous People Occupy Brazil’s Legislature, Protesting Bill’s Violation of Land Rights

Indigenous people were protesting a proposed constitutional amendment they fear could lead to corporate land grabs.

Representatives of indigenous groups from the five regions of Brazil protest against Bill PEC 215. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Indigenous leaders from the five regions of Brazil traveled for days to an encampment convoked by the Coordinating Body of Brazil’s indigenous people (APIB), which took place from April 13 to 16 in the federal district in Brasilia. The district is both a geographical center and a center of power in Brazil, as it is where the three branches of government are headquartered.

For four days and three nights, more than 1,500 indigenous individuals filled one of the gardens in front of the National Congress with colors, music and rituals. Their principal objective was to put pressure on the three branches of government so that the proposed constitutional amendment No. 215 – better known as the PEC 215/2000 – is not passed. This amendment, among other things, would transfer the decision-making power of demarcation of indigenous territories to Brazil’s legislative branch. Currently, this type of legal-political decision is in the hands of the executive branch.

“Indigenous people are moving toward complete disappearance. This law will leave us in the hands of the multinational corporations.”

Within Brazil’s Congress, there is a faction known as the “Rural Legislators,” a group of legislators who have transferred jurisdiction over private multinational companies to the legislative branch. Of the 50 members of Congress that make up the special commission that will review the proposed constitutional amendment, PEC 215/2000, at least 20 financed their electoral campaigns with support from big farming, mining and energy firms, as well as from the forestry sector and banks. Among the members of the Rural Legislators group is Agriculture Minister Katia Abreu, a business owner and fierce defender of big agriculture businesses. Another is Luis Carlos Heinze, one of the leaders of the group, who is also the president of the Parliamentary Farming Front (FPA). In 2014, a lawsuit was brought against him by indigenous organizations because he encouraged industrial farmers to use armed guards in order to forcibly remove indigenous people from their land.

Those who attended the protest dressed in their traditional attire as leaders and sages of the community and painted their faces with vibrant vegetable-based paints of red, yellow and black. Some smoked tobacco; others prepared their bows and arrows. It was a moment to take to the streets and deliver a letter signed by all of the groups present at the encampment, addressed to President Dilma Rousseff, urging her to approve and sign a bill that is still within her power regarding 20 indigenous territories. They also reminded her of her commitment, expressed to indigenous groups during her presidential campaign in an open letter in 2014, where she pledged not to change the constitution and to move ahead with demarcating indigenous lands.

“During her presidential campaign, she [Dilma Rousseff] committed to demarcating indigenous territory in Brazil. Today, we see that indigenous people are moving toward complete disappearance,” said Francisco da Silva, an indigenous Kapinawá leader from the state of Pernambuco. “If she herself does not honor her own words and the constitution, the only thing left for us to do is for us to demarcate our own territories and to defend our ancestral lands ourselves, because if we do nothing, this law will leave us in the hands of the multinational corporations.”

While the encampment was underway in Brasilia, Rousseff was asked by various media outlets in an April 15 press conference about those who were protesting. Her response attempted to discredit the presence of the indigenous groups. She affirmed that the discussion regarding indigenous rights in her administration is “systematic,” and stated that “there is no unified indigenous movement; the question regarding indigenous movements is not singular; it is diverse.”

“Having declared that, [Rousseff] committed a grave error in her discourse, because we are here with representatives of the five regions of the country, with more than 200 different indigenous groups represented,” said Sonia Guajajara, an indigenous woman from the state of Maranhao in northeast Brazil.

The military police were constantly present, protecting the headquarters of Brazil's three branches of government from the indigenous protesters. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)The military police were constantly present, protecting the headquarters of Brazil’s three branches of government from the indigenous protesters. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Dried Up Dialogue

The indigenous leader Babau Tupinamba, leader of one of the best-organized groups in Brazil, who live with a high degree of self-sufficiency, readily affirmed that indigenous people need to prepare themselves for a more radical, even violent struggle. “I said in the Congress that we have returned to colonial times. And we, as the Tupinamba, the first people to confront the colonizers in the year 1500, today we call on all indigenous people to prepare themselves for a confrontation. And if it is necessary, we will even form a guerrilla force if this law is not rejected,” he told Truthout.

“An indigenous person without land is no longer indigenous.”

Babau knows that his words carry a heavy weight and extreme responsibility, but argues that what is at risk are the lives of the indigenous people who are being assassinated by the owners of industrial farms. “We as indigenous people are pacifists; we have no desire to have a confrontation; we just want our lands. But with these types of decisions, they are pushing us to a point of rebellion. If we don’t have another option and they continue like this – there are 102 proposals in Congress against indigenous people – we will have to form a guerrilla, because we are not going to let them force us off our ancestral lands; we refuse to leave. Because an indigenous person without land is no longer indigenous.”

The PEC 215 bill is just one of the many violations of the human rights of indigenous people in Brazil. “There is no community right now that is not suffering the impacts of a capitalist project. Behind the impetus for this law are the interests of Monsanto, Nestlé, Syngenta, Cargill and other corporations that want to take our lands. They are the same ones that promote the killing of indigenous people,” Rootsi Tsitna, an indigenous person from the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, told Truthout.

All indigenous groups have suffered violations of their human rights. “There are hundreds of projects in indigenous communities and none of them consulted the people. They are violating the 1988 constitution, which came at the cost of a lot of blood, and the United Nation’s International Labor Convention 169, which establishes the requirement of previous consultation of indigenous people. We should not have to negotiate anything, because they are our lands and it is our right [to be here],” said da Silva, the indigenous man from Pernambuco.

A Xucuru dancer in front of Brazil's National Congress. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)A Xucuru dancer in front of Brazil’s National Congress. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Allies?

Not only indigenous groups worry about the PEC 215 bill. Organizations such as the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) have also expressed concern, since the amendment would also affect protected natural areas in the country. However, theirs contrasts with the position of several indigenous groups that have been affected by their politics. As an example, in 2011, the Maggi Group sold for the first time 85,000 tons of its “responsible soy,” with the “green label” given by the WWF, through a program of “environmental certification” in collaboration with Bunge, Cargill, Monsanto, Nestlé, Syngenta, Unilever and other corporations that have been connected to the forcible removal of indigenous people from their lands in Brazil and various countries around the world.

“The impetus for this law are the interests of Monsanto, Nestlé, Syngenta, Cargill and other corporations that want to take our lands.”

Some political figures came to visit the indigenous encampment as supposed allies, such as ex-presidential candidate Marina Silva. She is an honorary member of the International Union for Nature Conservation (UICN) and a defender of the conservation policies promoted by the WWF and other nongovernmental organizations that promote national parks, natural protected areas, peace parks, cross-border parks, sanctuaries and green market policies such as carbon credits.

“There are many politicians who have come to talk with us, above all during election season, but all that we want is the demarcation of our territories,” an indigenous Cayapo individual from the town of Xingu in Mato Grosso do Sul told Truthout. He argues that carbon credits are another way to remove them from their land. “We have seen the experiences of the Suruí people, who accepted the REDD and its carbon credits and conservation projects. They can no longer hunt, grow crops or use materials they need for celebrations and rituals,” he said. “We know how to take care of nature because she is our mother and we don’t want another carbon credit agreement, because it is just another way of removing us from our sacred lands.”

At the encampment, indigenous Mundurukus denounce plans to build the biggest hydroelectric dam in Brazil on the Tapajós River, which would lead to the disappearance of the Munduruku people. The presence of armed forces has been the only signal of dialogue thus far. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)At the encampment, indigenous Mundurukus denounce plans to build the biggest hydroelectric dam in Brazil on the Tapajós River, which would lead to the disappearance of the Munduruku people. The presence of armed forces has been the only signal of dialogue thus far. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Indian Day?

During the encampment, the indigenous leaders appeared in the House of Representatives and the Senate several times, not just to deliver their signed letter, but to express their discontent and their rage. The response was that PEC 215 will not be voted on, but neither will it be archived, which left the indigenous representatives unconvinced.

On the encampment’s last day, April 16, Congress’ doors were opened in a tribute to the indigenous representatives in honor of “Indian Day.” Due to security issues, only 500 out of 700 in attendance were allowed entrance. The mayor did not attend the event.

“We don’t want another carbon credit agreement because it is just another way of removing us from our sacred lands.”

Indigenous leader Marcos Xucuru expressed his anger and said that little should be expected of the government and political parties; what remains is the necessity of taking their land and assuming the consequences. “Our fight will continue and we are going to demarcate our lands ourselves. And if necessary, we will fight like the Tupinamba, who have confronted the federal police and the military and we will force them to leave our territory. As indigenous leaders, we are willing to give our lives for our Enchanted Ones – our ancestors – and for nature,” Xucuru told Truthout.

Babau says that it is the government that will be held responsible if the genocide continues in his country. “We call upon all indigenous people all over the world, who are the only ones who understand us, to pay attention to what will happen. Because the government had the opportunity to negotiate with us, but the dialogue is drying up,” he said. “We will offer our lives if necessary, but we will not let them take away our lands.”

An indigenous Tupinamba leader present at the march for the delivery of a letter addressed to Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff. He says that the dialogue has run dry. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)An indigenous Tupinamba leader present at the march for the delivery of a letter addressed to Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff. He says that the dialogue has run dry. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Indigenous Xingú people present to protest constitutional amendment PEC 215. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)Indigenous Xingú people present to protest constitutional amendment PEC 215. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Indigenous women leaders were present to denounce violations of human rights suffered by indigenous people. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)Indigenous women leaders were present to denounce violations of human rights suffered by indigenous people. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Raoni Metuktire (middle), one of the great leaders of the Kayapó people, is an internationally recognized figure for his fight for the preservation of the Amazon rainforest and indigenous culture. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)Raoni Metuktire (middle), one of the great leaders of the Kayapó people, is an internationally recognized figure for his fight for the preservation of the Amazon rainforest and indigenous culture. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

An indigenous individual from the town of Tembé, in the state of Pará. The town has been principally affected by the intense exploitation of wood resources. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)An indigenous individual from the town of Tembé, in the state of Pará. The town has been principally affected by the intense exploitation of wood resources. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

The indigenous Xucuru people from the state of Pernambuco are from one of the best-organized groups in Brazil. They say that their fight is for all the people of Brazil. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)The indigenous Xucuru people from the state of Pernambuco are from one of the best-organized groups in Brazil. They say that their fight is for all the people of Brazil. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

An indigenous person without land is no longer indigenous, and this bill looks to make us disappear, said the majority of the indigenous leaders who were present for the protests in Brasilia, Brazil's capital, where the three branches of government are located. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)“An indigenous person without land is no longer indigenous, and this bill looks to make us disappear,” said the majority of the indigenous leaders who were present for the protests in Brasilia, Brazil’s capital, where the three branches of government are located. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

The indigenous Xucuru from Pernambuco show their anger toward a state that they say does not respect the rights of indigenous people. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)The indigenous Xucuru from Pernambuco show their anger toward a state that they say does not respect the rights of indigenous people. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Indigenous strength resides in the spiritual realm, which is also a part of their struggle. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)Indigenous strength resides in the spiritual realm, which is also a part of their struggle. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

The Xucuru are ready to offer their lives to their Enchanted Ones, or ancestors, to defend their sacred lands. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)The Xucuru are ready to offer their lives to their Enchanted Ones, or ancestors, to defend their sacred lands. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

Women indigenous leaders share in a prayer directed toward bad government. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)Women indigenous leaders share in a prayer directed toward bad government. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

We as indigenous people are pacifists, but we are also prepared to fight if necessary, said the indigenous people in front of the headquarters of Brazil's three branches of government. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)“We as indigenous people are pacifists, but we are also prepared to fight if necessary,” said the indigenous people in front of the headquarters of Brazil’s three branches of government. (Photo: Santiago Navarro F.)

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $50,000 to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?