Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump Kicks Off Voter Fraud Commission With Innuendo That States Are Hiding Something

The president’s Commission on Election Integrity convened its first meeting on Wednesday.

President Trump speaks while flanked by Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and Vice President Mike Pence during the first meeting of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, on July 19, 2017, in Washington, DC. (Photo: Mark Wilson / Getty Images)

With everything going on in the White House, the media must maintain relentless pressure on the Trump administration. Can you support Truthout in this endeavor? Click here to donate to Truthout.

The President’s Commission on Election Integrity convened its first meeting on Wednesday in its bid to find rampant voter fraud in our election systems.

Since winning the presidency last November, Trump has repeatedly claimed — without evidence — that millions of people voted illegally in the contest. He made similarly dubious comments on Wednesday, suggesting that states not cooperating with his commission might have nefarious intentions.

As its first official act, the commission sent requests to all 50 states and Washington, DC last month for voter roll information, including individuals’ full names, addresses, voter history, party affiliation, and social security numbers.

Forty-four states and DC rejected the commission’s appeal on grounds that the data request was too intrusive. In some cases, states are legally prohibited from releasing that sort of voter information.

“If any state does not want to share this information, one had to wonder what they’re worried about.” President Trump said on Wednesday, ahead of the commission’s first meeting.

“There’s something,” he went on. “There always is.”

Conversely, various Secretaries of State have made similar charges of Trump’s voter commission. The body is chaired by Vice President Mike Pence, and co-chaired by Kris Kobach, the Kansas Secretary of State.

Kobach has a history of chasing down voter fraud to no avail. But his efforts have been successful in depressing voter turnout. His multi-state crosscheck system — allegedly created to find double-voters — instead wrongfully cast hundreds of thousands of people off voting rolls, according to a report in Rolling Stone by investigative journalist Greg Palast.

It’s that history, which has state officials worried about what the commission is actually up to.

“I will not provide sensitive voter information to a commission that has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of Californians voted illegally,” California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said in June, responding to the commission’s request for voter information.

Connecticut Secretary of State Denise Merrill echoed those sentiments, saying earlier this month: “Given Secretary Kobach’s history we find it very difficult to have confidence in the work of this Commission.”

Kobach appeared on CNN Wednesday, claiming his commission is interested in just the facts. “The commission is not set up to prove or disprove President Trump’s claim,” he said. “This commission is going to be looking at real figures, real numbers, real voter rolls and real cases.”

This is hardly a novel idea, however, as several researchers have devoted considerable time to quantifying voter fraud in the US.

One study out of Loyola, for example, looked at US elections between 2000 and 2014, and found only 31 instances of voter fraud out of more than 1 billion ballots cast.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $50,000 to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?