Friday, 19 December 2014 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG
  • Homeless People: Do You Just "Walk On By"?

    Is there a helpful way to respond when you encounter one of the approximately 578,424 people who are homeless on any given night in the United States today?

  • Quiet Distress Among the (Ex) Rich

    Yves Smith: The fact that economic distress has moved pretty high up the food chain is a sign that this recovery isn't all that it is cracked up to be.

War-Weary Republicans Rebuke Romney on Afghanistan

Friday, 02 December 2011 07:17 By Robert Naiman, Truthout | News Analysis
War-Weary Republicans Rebuke Romney on Afghanistan

 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. (Photo: Gage Skidmore / Flickr)

On Wednesday night, the Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment introduced by Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley calling on President Obama to speed up US military withdrawal from Afghanistan. This was a watershed event toward ending the war. The previous high-water mark of senators calling for expedited withdrawal was 27; the previous high-water mark on a vote was 18. The vote is a green light from the Senate to the White House for a faster military withdrawal that would save many American and Afghan lives and (at least) many tens of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Because it was a voice vote, there was no roll call. But if you want to know who especially to thank, 21 senators sponsored Merkley's amendment:

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Sen. Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana), Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico), Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland), Sen. Kent Conrad (D-North Dakota), Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York), Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vermont), Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington) , Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island).

The Senate vote - which saw John McCain standing alone in vocal opposition - is more evidence that, on key issues of war and military spending, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Buck McKeon haven't been speaking for Republicans generally. Big media should take note, and make more room on their playlists for Republicans like Rand Paul, Walter Jones, Justin Amash, Tim Johnson and Grover Norquist, who want to turn a corner on a decade of endless war and unchecked military spending.

In the Republican presidential debates, on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, Romney, Gingrich, and most of the other Republicans - not Ron Paul, of course - have mostly sung from the old-time Republican hymnal. On the Sunday talk shows, on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, McCain and Graham and McKeon - the go-to Republicans for big media on military issues - have sung from the old-time Republican hymnal.

But meanwhile, on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, the great sea of Republicans has been doing Vatican II.

On Iraq, Romney, Gingrich (Gingrich was for it before he was against it), and the other Republican candidates - not Ron Paul - slammed President Obama for withdrawing US troops in compliance with President Bush's Status of Forces Agreement. But 63 percent of Republicans told CBS that they agreed with President Obama's decision.

On military spending, Romney has demanded that President Obama block cuts to projected military spending. (Gingrich, to his credit, has dodged the neocon loyalty oath on opposition to cuts in military spending.) But when Congress passed the Budget Control Act, and when the "Supercommittee" failed to reach agreement on a deficit-reduction deal that would block half a trillion dollars in automatic cuts to projected military spending over ten years from taking effect, that reflected the majority of Republicans in Congress saying: we prefer military cuts to increased taxes.

(For a recent taste of how overripe the military budget is for cuts, read Ben Freeman's account for the Project on Government Oversight on how Defense Secretary Gates' efforts to stop the wasteful and expensive over promotion of generals have been reversed under former "budget hawk" Defense Secretary Panetta.)

On Afghanistan, Romney and McCain have slammed President Obama for pulling US troops out faster than the Pentagon wants. But Wednesday night, the Senate said: "We think you aren't pulling out the troops fast enough." (Note that a new Rasmussen poll says that three in five Americans want US troops out of Afghanistan immediately or within a year.)

It's time for big media to recognize that on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, Romney, Gingrich, McCain, Graham and McKeon are generals who have lost their Republican army. They rage like King Lear. But they have lost their kingdom.

And it's time for President Obama to bring our boys and girls home from Afghanistan.

Robert Naiman

Robert Naiman is policy director at Just Foreign Policy and president of Truthout's board of directors. 


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Error
  • JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 54

War-Weary Republicans Rebuke Romney on Afghanistan

Friday, 02 December 2011 07:17 By Robert Naiman, Truthout | News Analysis
War-Weary Republicans Rebuke Romney on Afghanistan

 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. (Photo: Gage Skidmore / Flickr)

On Wednesday night, the Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment introduced by Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley calling on President Obama to speed up US military withdrawal from Afghanistan. This was a watershed event toward ending the war. The previous high-water mark of senators calling for expedited withdrawal was 27; the previous high-water mark on a vote was 18. The vote is a green light from the Senate to the White House for a faster military withdrawal that would save many American and Afghan lives and (at least) many tens of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Because it was a voice vote, there was no roll call. But if you want to know who especially to thank, 21 senators sponsored Merkley's amendment:

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon), Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Sen. Tom Udall (D-New Mexico), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Sen. Max Baucus (D-Montana), Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico), Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California), Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland), Sen. Kent Conrad (D-North Dakota), Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-New York), Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vermont), Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington) , Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-West Virginia), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island).

The Senate vote - which saw John McCain standing alone in vocal opposition - is more evidence that, on key issues of war and military spending, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Buck McKeon haven't been speaking for Republicans generally. Big media should take note, and make more room on their playlists for Republicans like Rand Paul, Walter Jones, Justin Amash, Tim Johnson and Grover Norquist, who want to turn a corner on a decade of endless war and unchecked military spending.

In the Republican presidential debates, on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, Romney, Gingrich, and most of the other Republicans - not Ron Paul, of course - have mostly sung from the old-time Republican hymnal. On the Sunday talk shows, on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, McCain and Graham and McKeon - the go-to Republicans for big media on military issues - have sung from the old-time Republican hymnal.

But meanwhile, on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, the great sea of Republicans has been doing Vatican II.

On Iraq, Romney, Gingrich (Gingrich was for it before he was against it), and the other Republican candidates - not Ron Paul - slammed President Obama for withdrawing US troops in compliance with President Bush's Status of Forces Agreement. But 63 percent of Republicans told CBS that they agreed with President Obama's decision.

On military spending, Romney has demanded that President Obama block cuts to projected military spending. (Gingrich, to his credit, has dodged the neocon loyalty oath on opposition to cuts in military spending.) But when Congress passed the Budget Control Act, and when the "Supercommittee" failed to reach agreement on a deficit-reduction deal that would block half a trillion dollars in automatic cuts to projected military spending over ten years from taking effect, that reflected the majority of Republicans in Congress saying: we prefer military cuts to increased taxes.

(For a recent taste of how overripe the military budget is for cuts, read Ben Freeman's account for the Project on Government Oversight on how Defense Secretary Gates' efforts to stop the wasteful and expensive over promotion of generals have been reversed under former "budget hawk" Defense Secretary Panetta.)

On Afghanistan, Romney and McCain have slammed President Obama for pulling US troops out faster than the Pentagon wants. But Wednesday night, the Senate said: "We think you aren't pulling out the troops fast enough." (Note that a new Rasmussen poll says that three in five Americans want US troops out of Afghanistan immediately or within a year.)

It's time for big media to recognize that on Iraq, Afghanistan and military spending, Romney, Gingrich, McCain, Graham and McKeon are generals who have lost their Republican army. They rage like King Lear. But they have lost their kingdom.

And it's time for President Obama to bring our boys and girls home from Afghanistan.

Robert Naiman

Robert Naiman is policy director at Just Foreign Policy and president of Truthout's board of directors. 


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus