Skip to content Skip to footer
Demonstrators Confront Wells Fargo Shareholders

Demonstrators Confront Wells Fargo Shareholders

On Tuesday, April 24 in San Francisco, thousands of angry homeowners, immigrants, union members, Occupiers and community groups converged on the annual shareholders meeting of Wells Fargo Bank. In a carefully choreographed protest, simultaneous marches left Justin Herman Plaza on the city’s waterfront, the site of the Occupy San Francisco encampment last fall. Demonstrators walked up parallel streets into the financial district, where they encircled the block in which the meeting was set to take place, in the Julia Morgan ballroom of the Merchants Exchange Building.

Beforehand, some demonstrators had moved into the building’s lobby, while others chained themselves together, putting sleeves around their arms to make it hard for police to cut them apart to arrest them.

A group of religious, union and community representatives had purchased shares of stock in the bank beforehand, supposedly allowing them to attend the shareholders meeting. Some even held proxies, Demonstrators Sonfront Wells Fargo Shareholdersallowing them to vote the stock belonging to others. As the rally swirled outside and speeches and songs filled the streets now vacant of normal traffic, the police closed off the building and refused to let the shareholders inside.

Maria Poblet, from the housing rights organization Just Cause, and Cinthya Muñoz, from Alameda County United in Defense of Immigrant Rights, spoke from a flatbed truck in front of the bank, reminding the crowd of the reasons they’d brought their protests to the bank’s doors. “Shareholders want to meet about how to best reap profits from foreclosures, for-profit prisons and detentionDemonstrators Confront Wells Fargo Shareholders centers, student loans, and tax evasion,” Poblet shouted. “Today the bank can see that there’s no more business as usual. We say no!”

Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf, however, closed the meeting to the shareholders kept at bay by the police outside.

“Wells Fargo’s actions today demonstrate what communities across this country have been experiencing for years: Wells Fargo is indifferent to the DEMONSTRATORS CONFRONT WELLS FARGO SHAREHOLDERShavoc they are wreaking in our communities and they do not want to be held accountable,” said Wallace Hill, whose home was foreclosed on by Wells Fargo in Oakland.

Earlier in April, housing rights activists met with Jon Campbell, Wells Fargo’s executive in charge of social responsibility. They proposed a series of measures to meet the crisis faced by families whose homes are underwater, and a moratorium on foreclosures. Campbell refused to consider any of their demands. The bank is the U.S.’s largest servicer of home mortgages. “We are the 99 percent, and we won’t take no for an answer!” Muñoz shouted from the flatbed truck.

Fifteen protesting shareholders were finally permitted across police lines and went into the meeting. When Stumpf began a presentation congratulating the bank for making a $15.9 billion profit last year, in the Demonstrators Confront Wells Fargo Shareholdersmidst of foreclosures and a recession, they interrupted him. Police converged on them, took them out of the meeting, and cited and released them. Nine others were arrested outside.

Afterwards, the remaining shareholders approved a $19.8 million compensation package for Stumpf’s last year’s labor.

“The bank is pleased with the progress we’ve made in a tough economy,” bank Vice President Oscar Suris told the media. “We’ll continue focusing on our customers, and that includes our customers who are going through difficult economic times.”

DEMONSTRATORS CONFRONT WELLS FARGO SHAREHOLDERS

DEMONSTRATORS CONFRONT WELLS FARGO SHAREHOLDERS

DEMONSTRATORS CONFRONT WELLS FARGO SHAREHOLDERS

DEMONSTRATORS CONFRONT WELLS FARGO SHAREHOLDERS

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $50,000 to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?