Monday, 20 October 2014 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG
  • The Shell Game of Contingent Employment

    When subcontractors, freelancers and independent contractors get hurt or abused on the job, these workers are finding it harder to hold employers accountable. This is no accident - it's a direct result of a neoliberal labor agenda.

  • Paying the Price of Tar Sands Expansion

    Despite all the reasons to keep tar sands in the ground, the refining equipment tax credit has helped put tar sands development in the US on the rise, accelerating climate change at the expense of US taxpayers.

Pennsylvania Seeks to "Reprioritize" Funding Away From Planned Parenthood

Friday, 25 May 2012 13:48 By Robin Marty, RH Reality Check | Report

Anti-choice politicians in the state of Pennsylvania are attempting to change the way family planning and health care funds for low income women are allocated, putting Planned Parenthood affiliates last in line.

Via PennLive:

[Republican Rep. Daryl] Metcalfe introduced House Bill 2405 that would maintain the state funding for preventative health screenings but give priority it to organizations that provide comprehensive care and not ones he said whose primary function is to conduct abortions...

"Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortionists," Metcalfe said. "The Whole Woman's Health Funding Priorities Act will structure the law in a way that funding for women's health will go to providers that are actually focused on providing care for women rather than facilities that are focused on ending the lives of the unborn."

Pennsylvania isn't the first state to attempt to "re-prioritize" the funding in a hope that it will run out before it can ever get to Planned Parenthood affiliates and other groups that provide abortions.  Ohio recently proposed the same plan as part of its biannual budget, although it was eventually stripped from the bill. It has now been proposed again as a stand alone bill that is pending in a House committee.

The new "re-prioritize" agenda is a clever way to get around the threatened administrative lawsuits that come with declaring Planned Parenthood exempt from inclusion when it comes to family planning funding.  This way, a state is unlikely to be sued for discriminating against a particular entity, which is what got the state of Texas in trouble when it pulled funding to the reproductive health provider via its Women's Health Program.

Should the bill pass without fanfare, expect more states to do the same.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Robin Marty

Robin Marty is a freelance writer and editor from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Formerly, she worked as the Director of Special Projects for the Center for Independent Media.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Pennsylvania Seeks to "Reprioritize" Funding Away From Planned Parenthood

Friday, 25 May 2012 13:48 By Robin Marty, RH Reality Check | Report

Anti-choice politicians in the state of Pennsylvania are attempting to change the way family planning and health care funds for low income women are allocated, putting Planned Parenthood affiliates last in line.

Via PennLive:

[Republican Rep. Daryl] Metcalfe introduced House Bill 2405 that would maintain the state funding for preventative health screenings but give priority it to organizations that provide comprehensive care and not ones he said whose primary function is to conduct abortions...

"Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortionists," Metcalfe said. "The Whole Woman's Health Funding Priorities Act will structure the law in a way that funding for women's health will go to providers that are actually focused on providing care for women rather than facilities that are focused on ending the lives of the unborn."

Pennsylvania isn't the first state to attempt to "re-prioritize" the funding in a hope that it will run out before it can ever get to Planned Parenthood affiliates and other groups that provide abortions.  Ohio recently proposed the same plan as part of its biannual budget, although it was eventually stripped from the bill. It has now been proposed again as a stand alone bill that is pending in a House committee.

The new "re-prioritize" agenda is a clever way to get around the threatened administrative lawsuits that come with declaring Planned Parenthood exempt from inclusion when it comes to family planning funding.  This way, a state is unlikely to be sued for discriminating against a particular entity, which is what got the state of Texas in trouble when it pulled funding to the reproductive health provider via its Women's Health Program.

Should the bill pass without fanfare, expect more states to do the same.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Robin Marty

Robin Marty is a freelance writer and editor from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Formerly, she worked as the Director of Special Projects for the Center for Independent Media.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus