Skip to content Skip to footer
|

The Remarkable, Lurid and Criminal Story of Now-Former Sen. John Ensign

We don't usually offer much space here to sex scandals, unless, in some cases, they demonstrate, for example, blatantly offensive hypocrisy in regard to everyone else's civil rights (talking to you, disgraced former Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho)) —- or, as in the case of disgraced now-former Sen. John Ensign (R-Nevada), charges of blatant criminality. The details out of the bi-partisan, unanimously approved 68-page report released late yesterday by the US Senate Ethics Committee —- which usually does absolutely nothing —- referring the Ensign case to the Department of Justice and the FEC for criminal prosecution are stunning, and much worse than previously understood.

We don't usually offer much space here to sex scandals, unless, in some cases, they demonstrate, for example, blatantly offensive hypocrisy in regard to everyone else's civil rights (talking to you, disgraced former Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho)) —- or, as in the case of disgraced now-former Sen. John Ensign (R-Nevada), charges of blatant criminality.

The details out of the bi-partisan, unanimously approved 68-page report released late yesterday by the US Senate Ethics Committee —- which usually does absolutely nothing —- referring the Ensign case to the Department of Justice and the FEC for criminal prosecution are stunning, and much worse than previously understood.

In their letter to the DoJ [PDF] the Committee's Chair and Vice-Chair, Senators Barbara Boxer (D-California) and Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Georgia) respectively, refer the matter…

[S]howing that Senator Ensign and others:
  • aided and abetted violations of the one-year post-employment contact restriction,
  • conspired to violate that restriction,
  • made false statements to the Federal Election Commission,
  • violated campaign finance laws, and
  • obstructed the Committee's preliminary inquiry.

But even that damning summary of wrong-doing fails to adequately describe the offensive squalor at the heart of this mess, as you'll see below.

Moreover, another reason worth mentioning the whole scandal here: there may be at least one scofflaw still on the loose in regards this matter, still serving in the US Senate —- namely, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma), one of the very few involved in this extraordinarily ugly, sad and shameful scandal to have, so far, gotten off largely scot-free despite his apparent role in attempting to cover it all up for his friend Ensign.

Stand up to the monolith of corporate news – support real independent journalism by donating to Truthout here.

Finally, there is still one more reason to mention all of this: to highlight the fact that Ensign has now been replaced in the US Senate by the scofflaw, and lying, former NV Secretary of State Dean Heller. Be sure to read on below for details on him and how he too has been allowed to avoid accountability for years despite having, in 2004, illegally certified the 100% unverifiable e-voting systems now used across the state of Nevada (and also used to elect him to the US House of Representatives in 2006.)

Rachel Maddow did a fine job of summarizing the remarkable Senate Ethics Committee report on Ensign on Thursday night, so we'll happily allow her to do so again below, as we're buried in several other stories ourselves at the moment…

The other point that we've only got time to mention here at the moment: The man named to replace Ensign in the US Senate following his resignation last week is Nevada's former Republican Secretary of State turned US Representative now turned US Senator Dean Heller.

Heller is, himself, a scofflaw, having illegally certified Nevada's Sequoia touch-screen voting systems with so-called “Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail” as SoS in 2004. We reported on the matter exclusively with Michael Richardson and John Gideon in the 2008 book “Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008” as based on our detailed, six-month-plus investigation into how Heller blatantly lied to the media and the public about the failed status of the federal testing of those machines, certified them for use in the 2004 election in violation of state law, and how the wholly corrupt US Election Assistance Commission (EAC) helped him cover his tracks in the process.

If any media are interested in that long-ignored story, now that it involves a sitting US Senator, please see the chapter of “Loser Take All” entitled “The Selling of the Touch Screen 'Paper Trail': From Nevada to the EAC,” and otherwise feel free to touch base if you have any questions.

We’re not going to stand for it. Are you?

You don’t bury your head in the sand. You know as well as we do what we’re facing as a country, as a people, and as a global community. Here at Truthout, we’re gearing up to meet these threats head on, but we need your support to do it: We must raise $50,000 to ensure we can keep publishing independent journalism that doesn’t shy away from difficult — and often dangerous — topics.

We can do this vital work because unlike most media, our journalism is free from government or corporate influence and censorship. But this is only sustainable if we have your support. If you like what you’re reading or just value what we do, will you take a few seconds to contribute to our work?