Sunday, 14 February 2016 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG

NEVER MISS ANOTHER STORY

Truthout can deliver investigative journalism to your inbox every day, with no ads or sponsored content - ever.

Keep up to date by subscribing to our daily newsletter!

Optional Member Code

Regulators: Mega-Banks Like Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Still a Giant Threat to the US

Sunday, 17 August 2014 00:00 By Lynn Parramore, AlterNet | Op-Ed

Citibank(Photo: Susan Sermoneta)We hear a lot of big talk about how Dodd-Frank has made the financial system safer. That law was enacted to make certain that the country never gets blown apart by a financial crisis like the one in 2008.

But does anybody really believe it?

The bank regulators sure don’t. The FDIC just put out a press release summarizing problems with resolution plans submitted by 11 big banks, including Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and other behemoths. These resolution plans, also called “living wills,” spell out how the banks will handle things in the event the financial shit hits the fan.

The FDIC noted several areas where bank plans don’t pass the smell test:

While the shortcomings of the plans varied across the first-wave firms, the agencies have identified several common features of the plans' shortcomings. These common features include: (i) assumptions that the agencies regard as unrealistic or inadequately supported, such as assumptions about the likely behavior of customers, counterparties, investors, central clearing facilities, and regulators, and (ii) the failure to make, or even to identify, the kinds of changes in firm structure and practices that would be necessary to enhance the prospects for orderly resolution.

The FDIC recommended that banks should, among other things, establish “a rational and less complex legal structure” to address resolution and show that they actually have basic operational capabilities, like the ability to produce reliable information in a timely manner. And so on.

In short, the FDIC says that the banks’ plans are “not credible.”

Based on the review of the 2013 plans, the FDIC Board of Directors determined pursuant to section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act that the plans submitted by the first-wave filers are not credible and do not facilitate an orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Federal Reserve Board determined that the 11 banking organizations must take immediate action to improve their resolvability and reflect those improvements in their 2015 plans.

I guess we can just pray that another crisis doesn't hit before these new plans are submitted a year from now.

As Senator Elizabeth Warren recently stated in an op-ed co-authored by John McCain, Maria Cantwell and Angus King, “the chances of another financial crisis will remain unacceptably high as long as there are financial institutions that are ‘too big to fail.'"

Six years after the financial crisis, the big banks obviously have not yet been brought down to size. They are more concentrated than ever, and more incentivized to take dangerous risks that expose hard-working Americans to suffering and ruin. So we’re all pretty much just sitting ducks waiting for the next shitstorm. Not a great plan, is it?

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Lynn Parramore

Lynn Parramore is Senior Research Analyst at the Institute for New Economic Thinking. A cultural theorist who studies the intersection of culture and economics, she is Contributing Editor at AlterNet, where she received the Bill Moyers/Schumann Foundation fellowship in journalism for 2012. She is also a frequent contributor to Reuters, Al Jazeera, Salon, Huffington Post, and other outlets. Her first book of cultural history, Reading the Sphinx (Palgrave Macmillan) was named a “Notable Scholarly Book for 2008” by the Chronicle of Higher Education. A web entrepreneur, Parramore is co-founder of the Next New Deal (formerly New Deal 2.0) blog of the Roosevelt Institute, where she served as media fellow from 2009-2011, and she is also co-founder of Recessionwire.com, and founding editor of IgoUgo.com. Parramore received her doctorate from New York University in 2007. She has taught writing and semiotics at NYU and has collaborated with some of the country’s leading economists her ebooks, including “Corporations for the 99%” with William Lazonick and “New Economic Visions” with Gar Alperovitz. In 2011, she co-edited a key documentary book on the Occupy movement: The 99%: How the Occupy Movement is Changing America.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES
Optional Member Code

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


Regulators: Mega-Banks Like Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Still a Giant Threat to the US

Sunday, 17 August 2014 00:00 By Lynn Parramore, AlterNet | Op-Ed

Citibank(Photo: Susan Sermoneta)We hear a lot of big talk about how Dodd-Frank has made the financial system safer. That law was enacted to make certain that the country never gets blown apart by a financial crisis like the one in 2008.

But does anybody really believe it?

The bank regulators sure don’t. The FDIC just put out a press release summarizing problems with resolution plans submitted by 11 big banks, including Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and other behemoths. These resolution plans, also called “living wills,” spell out how the banks will handle things in the event the financial shit hits the fan.

The FDIC noted several areas where bank plans don’t pass the smell test:

While the shortcomings of the plans varied across the first-wave firms, the agencies have identified several common features of the plans' shortcomings. These common features include: (i) assumptions that the agencies regard as unrealistic or inadequately supported, such as assumptions about the likely behavior of customers, counterparties, investors, central clearing facilities, and regulators, and (ii) the failure to make, or even to identify, the kinds of changes in firm structure and practices that would be necessary to enhance the prospects for orderly resolution.

The FDIC recommended that banks should, among other things, establish “a rational and less complex legal structure” to address resolution and show that they actually have basic operational capabilities, like the ability to produce reliable information in a timely manner. And so on.

In short, the FDIC says that the banks’ plans are “not credible.”

Based on the review of the 2013 plans, the FDIC Board of Directors determined pursuant to section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act that the plans submitted by the first-wave filers are not credible and do not facilitate an orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Federal Reserve Board determined that the 11 banking organizations must take immediate action to improve their resolvability and reflect those improvements in their 2015 plans.

I guess we can just pray that another crisis doesn't hit before these new plans are submitted a year from now.

As Senator Elizabeth Warren recently stated in an op-ed co-authored by John McCain, Maria Cantwell and Angus King, “the chances of another financial crisis will remain unacceptably high as long as there are financial institutions that are ‘too big to fail.'"

Six years after the financial crisis, the big banks obviously have not yet been brought down to size. They are more concentrated than ever, and more incentivized to take dangerous risks that expose hard-working Americans to suffering and ruin. So we’re all pretty much just sitting ducks waiting for the next shitstorm. Not a great plan, is it?

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Lynn Parramore

Lynn Parramore is Senior Research Analyst at the Institute for New Economic Thinking. A cultural theorist who studies the intersection of culture and economics, she is Contributing Editor at AlterNet, where she received the Bill Moyers/Schumann Foundation fellowship in journalism for 2012. She is also a frequent contributor to Reuters, Al Jazeera, Salon, Huffington Post, and other outlets. Her first book of cultural history, Reading the Sphinx (Palgrave Macmillan) was named a “Notable Scholarly Book for 2008” by the Chronicle of Higher Education. A web entrepreneur, Parramore is co-founder of the Next New Deal (formerly New Deal 2.0) blog of the Roosevelt Institute, where she served as media fellow from 2009-2011, and she is also co-founder of Recessionwire.com, and founding editor of IgoUgo.com. Parramore received her doctorate from New York University in 2007. She has taught writing and semiotics at NYU and has collaborated with some of the country’s leading economists her ebooks, including “Corporations for the 99%” with William Lazonick and “New Economic Visions” with Gar Alperovitz. In 2011, she co-edited a key documentary book on the Occupy movement: The 99%: How the Occupy Movement is Changing America.


Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus