Tuesday, 26 July 2016 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG

POWERED BY READERS

Our nonprofit newsroom is everything the mainstream media is not.

Through investigative journalism and daily news analysis, Truthout is a vital resource for relevant and trustworthy news.

Support from readers is the only way we can continue publishing the stories you want to see. Make a donation today!

Click here
to donate.

"Data Trespass," Wyoming's Fancy Name for Ag-Gag

Friday, 20 March 2015 00:00 By Sue Udry, Dissent NewsWire | Op-Ed
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print

Jonathan Ratner tests water. He visits streams in Wyoming, takes samples and tests it for E. coli. He's been testing streams for years, concerned that waste from Wyoming's 1.3 million cattle is polluting streams. And it is.

Ratner sends his results to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, or DEQ so that streams with too much E. coli can be put on the impaired waters list. That list goes to the Environmental Protection Agency, and, under the Clean Water Act, state and federal regulators should then take action to reduce the level of pollution. Ratner says that means keeping cattle from grazing too close to streams.

But this is Wyoming, "the cowboy state," and ranchers don't take kindly to being told where their cattle can roam. So last week, Governor Matt Mead signed Senate file 12, a bill that makes it a felony to trespass to unlawfully collect data, and prohibits any data collected "unlawfully" from being used in and civil, criminal or administrative proceeding. Animal rights and environmental activists are calling it an "Ag-gag" law, and, according to Wyoming Public Radio, "Wyoming agriculture interests are supporting the bill to thwart environmental researchers, who, they claim, often collect environmental data to support their legal efforts." But legislators say it's all to do with property rights and privacy.

"I want to remind the body that this is information, this data, is private information," said Senator Larry Hicks during debate. "In a lot of ways it is no different than your social security number.  It has some of the same ramifications if that resides in the public domain."

Ratner has been collecting his samples on public property, he isn't sneaking onto private ranches in the dark of night. But the bill would still make what he does a felony. To understand that, you need to understand this about Wyoming: it's big, there aren't a lot of people, and while most land in the state is public, the roads everyone drives on often cut through private property. Ratner says it's not uncommon for the Bureau of Land Management to build a road on private property and not bother to get an easement from the owner. They're mostly just dirt roads anyway.

Because of this quirk of Wyoming roadways, which force people to drive on private land (and therefore, trespass), the law "makes millions of acres of BLM land off limits to me," Ratner says.

The sense around the state is that the law is specifically targeted at Ratner and his organization, Western Watersheds, but it could apply to whistleblowers in various industries. Paige Tomaselli, a senior attorney at the Center for Food Safety told Wyoming News "Our reading of the law is it is broad enough that it could apply to any facility, including animal processing facilities or factories. It might not specifically say it deals with animal facilities, as a law in Idaho does, but we think it would still apply."

An amendment that would have specifically exempted data having to do with "the health, treatment or welfare of a domesticated animal" was defeated on a voice vote, according the Wyoming News.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES
Optional Member Code

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb


"Data Trespass," Wyoming's Fancy Name for Ag-Gag

Friday, 20 March 2015 00:00 By Sue Udry, Dissent NewsWire | Op-Ed
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print

Jonathan Ratner tests water. He visits streams in Wyoming, takes samples and tests it for E. coli. He's been testing streams for years, concerned that waste from Wyoming's 1.3 million cattle is polluting streams. And it is.

Ratner sends his results to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, or DEQ so that streams with too much E. coli can be put on the impaired waters list. That list goes to the Environmental Protection Agency, and, under the Clean Water Act, state and federal regulators should then take action to reduce the level of pollution. Ratner says that means keeping cattle from grazing too close to streams.

But this is Wyoming, "the cowboy state," and ranchers don't take kindly to being told where their cattle can roam. So last week, Governor Matt Mead signed Senate file 12, a bill that makes it a felony to trespass to unlawfully collect data, and prohibits any data collected "unlawfully" from being used in and civil, criminal or administrative proceeding. Animal rights and environmental activists are calling it an "Ag-gag" law, and, according to Wyoming Public Radio, "Wyoming agriculture interests are supporting the bill to thwart environmental researchers, who, they claim, often collect environmental data to support their legal efforts." But legislators say it's all to do with property rights and privacy.

"I want to remind the body that this is information, this data, is private information," said Senator Larry Hicks during debate. "In a lot of ways it is no different than your social security number.  It has some of the same ramifications if that resides in the public domain."

Ratner has been collecting his samples on public property, he isn't sneaking onto private ranches in the dark of night. But the bill would still make what he does a felony. To understand that, you need to understand this about Wyoming: it's big, there aren't a lot of people, and while most land in the state is public, the roads everyone drives on often cut through private property. Ratner says it's not uncommon for the Bureau of Land Management to build a road on private property and not bother to get an easement from the owner. They're mostly just dirt roads anyway.

Because of this quirk of Wyoming roadways, which force people to drive on private land (and therefore, trespass), the law "makes millions of acres of BLM land off limits to me," Ratner says.

The sense around the state is that the law is specifically targeted at Ratner and his organization, Western Watersheds, but it could apply to whistleblowers in various industries. Paige Tomaselli, a senior attorney at the Center for Food Safety told Wyoming News "Our reading of the law is it is broad enough that it could apply to any facility, including animal processing facilities or factories. It might not specifically say it deals with animal facilities, as a law in Idaho does, but we think it would still apply."

An amendment that would have specifically exempted data having to do with "the health, treatment or welfare of a domesticated animal" was defeated on a voice vote, according the Wyoming News.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus