A recent article in The Atlantic implies climate change to be wrongly viewed as something we don't yet know much about. This article, "American Trees Are Moving West, and No One Knows Why," is half correct. The authors in the study reported upon reveal the reasons why trees are shifting west (as well as north), and that the shift is intrinsically related to climate change. That "No One Knows Why" these trees are shifting westward is fundamentally not a part of this research.
The authors say that the westward shift is because climate change has changed moisture patterns, that increased moisture in western portions of the eastern U.S. is the cause for this seemingly counterintuitive westward shift, and it is predominant among young trees that are more resistant to drought even in the face of sporadic drought pulses in the west. From the paper:
"The observed differential shift rates could also be due to the fact that saplings are more sensitive to droughts in terms of survival than adult trees, as substantial drought was observed in the southeastern region of the study area during the study period."
Of critical importance to climate change awareness and the rate that we are changing our climate today, the authors tell us that these changes are happening 60 times faster than those documented in climate changes in recent prehistory.
"Similar northward shifts of clades [groups of tree species] were observed in the New England area during the early Holocene (between 10,000 and 8000 years ago), where Picea [spruce] was replaced by Pinus [pine], followed by Betula [birch] and then Quercus [oak] species. However, the historical process took place over several thousand years, whereas the observed shift in this study happened in a few decades, suggesting the impacts of recent climate change, along with other nonclimatic factors (for example, land use change and forest management), on vegetation dynamics."
This species succession, or climate induced vegetation change, is being observed all across western North America where drought pulses have become more severe. It's not the overall moisture that matters, it's the extremes. Precipitation can increase, but if drought pulses are severe enough, they cause stress that allows insect and disease infestation and even kill mature trees. These dead forests are then replaced by young trees that are more drought tolerant, until they get a little older. Then the process repeats as climate change weather extremes become even more severe, resulting in ecological chaos where forests never mature.
The young trees are moving westward because during non-drought periods, moisture is more abundant, making the environment more suitable to eastern species with greater moisture needs. When drought recurs, the younger trees are more drought tolerant than the mature trees in the area, allowing these "invading" species to persist.
This process can be observed in the high altitudes and high latitudes of western North America where drought stress is the major player in the death of 60 to 90 percent of the spruce, fir and pine trees in nearly 100 million acres of forest because of native bark beetles and diseases that are opportunistic in drought stressed trees.
In Texas, 300 million mature trees were killed by drought in the 2011 drought pulse alone. These trees were generally 100 to multi-hundreds of years old putting a punctuation point on the frequency of the extreme drought that killed them.
Climate change is not simple, and simple explanations of observed impacts are detrimental to the increasing understanding of what climate change is actually doing to our world. One of the basic assumptions about observed changes in our world compared times past needs to change. This assumption is that these changes can be explained by other factors. At times, this is a valid assumption. But in general, if it looks like, or tastes like, or smells like climate change, it is.