Friday, 29 April 2016 / TRUTH-OUT.ORG
  • A Two-Pronged Assault on Women

    We heard a lot about the "war on women" during the 2012 election cycle. While the phrase has faded this election year, the war on women has not. Now we're fighting on two fronts -- reproductive rights and economic survival.

  • The Pragmatic Impacts of Bernie Sanders' Big Dreams

    Even with Tuesday's campaign setbacks, Bernie Sanders' pledge to make the country more equitable and sustainable is more realistic than some people are letting on.

Court Orders Release of Justice Department Memo Justifying Drone Strike

Monday, 28 April 2014 11:54 By Staff, Brennan Center for Justice | Press Release
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print

Yesterday, a federal appeals panel ordered the government to release of a classified Justice Department memo outlining the legal justification for the 2011 drone strike that killed U.S. citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki. The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law joined an amicus brief in the case arguing that the government’s attempt to withhold the legal memo results in “secret law” and runs contrary to the Freedom of Information Act.

In yesterday’s ruling, the federal appeals panel held that the government waived any claim to secrecy of the memo due to public statements made by the administration about the lawfulness of drone strikes, including a “white paper” issued by the JusticeDepartment. A judge on the appeals panel wrote that these disclosures preclude the government from claiming that the legal justification for drone strikes cannot be made public.

“The court’s ruling serves as a powerful statement that the government cannot cherry-pick what it chooses to reveal about the legal basis for its counterterrorism policies,” said Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center. “Too often, all the government needs to do is utter the words ‘national security’ and courts dutifully stand down. But the Second Circuit refused to let the government side-step its disclosure obligations so easily.”

Read the court ruling and the amicus brief.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Related Stories

Drone Attacks Can't Save the G8's Bacon
By Nick Mottern, Truthout | Op-Ed
Drone Strike Justice
By William B Daniels, SpeakOut | Op-Ed
Drone City
By Khalil Bendib, OtherWords | Political Cartoon

Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
GET DAILY TRUTHOUT UPDATES
Optional Member Code

FOLLOW togtorsstottofb

Popular On Speakout


Featured On Speakout

Court Orders Release of Justice Department Memo Justifying Drone Strike

Monday, 28 April 2014 11:54 By Staff, Brennan Center for Justice | Press Release
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print

Yesterday, a federal appeals panel ordered the government to release of a classified Justice Department memo outlining the legal justification for the 2011 drone strike that killed U.S. citizen Anwar Al-Awlaki. The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law joined an amicus brief in the case arguing that the government’s attempt to withhold the legal memo results in “secret law” and runs contrary to the Freedom of Information Act.

In yesterday’s ruling, the federal appeals panel held that the government waived any claim to secrecy of the memo due to public statements made by the administration about the lawfulness of drone strikes, including a “white paper” issued by the JusticeDepartment. A judge on the appeals panel wrote that these disclosures preclude the government from claiming that the legal justification for drone strikes cannot be made public.

“The court’s ruling serves as a powerful statement that the government cannot cherry-pick what it chooses to reveal about the legal basis for its counterterrorism policies,” said Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center. “Too often, all the government needs to do is utter the words ‘national security’ and courts dutifully stand down. But the Second Circuit refused to let the government side-step its disclosure obligations so easily.”

Read the court ruling and the amicus brief.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Related Stories

Drone Attacks Can't Save the G8's Bacon
By Nick Mottern, Truthout | Op-Ed
Drone Strike Justice
By William B Daniels, SpeakOut | Op-Ed
Drone City
By Khalil Bendib, OtherWords | Political Cartoon

Hide Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus