SpeakOut is Truthout's treasure chest for bloggy, quirky, personally reflective, or especially activism-focused pieces. SpeakOut articles represent the perspectives of their authors, and not those of Truthout.
Washington DC - The developing world saw a record $991 billion leave their countries due to corrupt practices and corporate tax evasion in 2012, according to a new report by Global Financial Integrity (GFI). GFI refers to this massive non-taxed loss as illicit financial flows and reports developing countries lost $6.6 trillion between 2003 and 2012. Such losses are growing at 9.4% per year. The report shows links between illicit flows and global poverty: developing and emerging countries lose 11 times more money to illicit flows than they receive in official aid.
"The poorest countries in the world are losing more money than they receive in aid," noted Eric LeCompte, Executive Director of Jubilee USA, a religious anti-poverty group. "If we take Global Financial Integrity's findings seriously, we can address extreme poverty in our lifetimes."
Democrats, liberals, and progressives (the DLP) will have to unite if they are to win the 2016 elections and those beyond. The United States needs to move in new directions rather than follow the Republican mission of restoring a golden past that never existed, and a unified DLP is the main route for the nation to recognize and act on the challenging realities emerging.
An important lesson from 2014 electoral defeats is that getting voters out is an insufficient means of winning an election, certainly not one that seeks to deal with the big changes occurring in the United States. Instead, to determine election outcomes, the DLP must attract a majority of the almost 40 percent of voters uncommitted to either party, a percentage that is larger than those committed to either of the two competing parties. The uncommitted will have to be won over to DLP perceptions and prescriptions, and given a realistic picture of the United States' emerging difficulties.
I first met Eric Holder during the Clinton years when he was serving as Deputy Attorney General. Back then, my community was deeply troubled by FBI harassment, the government's use of "secret evidence" to detain individuals, and profiling of Muslim or Arab-looking individuals at airports around the country.
Working with then Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, Bill Lann Lee, the Department of Justice convened a series of meetings, some chaired by Attorney General Janet Reno, others by Holder, that provided us with the opportunity to address each of these concerns. Holder was responsive. Subjective airport profiling diminished, meetings were organized between FBI field offices and leaders of the Arab American community, and, after a case-by-case review, most of the 23 Arabs who had been held on "secret evidence" were released.
Vienna, Austria - A pair of conferences here Dec. 6-9 have tried to raise public and government awareness of nuclear weapons.
The first, a Civil Society Forum put on by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, ICAN, brought together NGOs, parliamentarians, and activists of all stripes to try and boost morale and renew enthusiasm in efforts to ban the bomb.
In 1986, a black Massachusetts prisoner serving a life sentence for murder brutalized a Maryland couple during a weekend furlough. The prisoner's name was Willie Horton. During the 1988 presidential election, the George H.W. Bush campaign made extensive use of the story and the image of Willie Horton to attack his opponent, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis. Dukakis was branded as a coddler of criminals, unable and unwilling to protect the public. There was, of course, nothing new about the tactic of manipulating white fear of black criminality for political gain. (Dukakis neither initiated the furlough program, nor did he have control over it as governor.) But the spectacular success of the ploy in the 1988 presidential campaign made "Willie Horton" shorthand for this maneuver.
Since its publication in 2004, Voices of a People’s History of the United States has played a vital role in my classroom—not only revealing the voices of social justice from the past so often choked into lifelessness by the standard issue corporate textbooks, but also inspiring my students to take actions of their own. Over the semesters and over the years, I repeatedly point students towards this collection of primary sources when they want to understand the ideas that helped propel social change: Bartolome De Las Casas' “The Devastation of the Indies;” Tecumseh's "Speech to the Osages;" Fredrick Douglass’ “What to the slave is the forth of July;” Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a Woman?;” Eugene Deb’s statement to the court upon being arrested for speaking out against WWI; Helen Keller’s “Strike Against War;” Billie Holliday’s “Strange Fruit;” Bob Dylan’s “Masters of War;” Malcolm X’s “Message to the Grassroots,” and many others.
One of the many great actions that students at my school participated in was the 2013 boycott of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test. When teachers announced that year they would refuse to give thedeeply flawed MAP test, the student government voted unanimously to support that boycott. When teachers wouldn’t give the test, the school district decreed that the building administration would have to pull students out of class and march them off to the computer labs to take the test. It was then that students staged a sit-in—in their own classrooms!—refusing to have their class time wasted by a test that was not relevant to what they were learning in class.
That’s the stuff to give the troops!
The transcript (via WaPo):
Mr. President, I’m back on the floor to talk about a dangerous provision that was slipped into a must-pass spending bill at the last minute to benefit Wall Street. This provision would repeal a rule called, and I’m quoting the title of the rule, “PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES.”
On Wednesday, I came to the floor to talk to Democrats, asking them to strip this provision out of the omnibus bill and protect taxpayers.
A year ago SISMEC pointed out that, although most of the victims of US drone strikes have ostensibly been “militants,” the White House definition of “militant” is extremely vague(generally, any fighting-aged male). Moreover, the purpose of the program isn’t to target any and all possible combatants, but instead to eliminate high-value targets from international terror organizations who pose a substantial threat to the US homeland. So the best measure of the “hit-rate” of the drone program wouldn’t be to compare the number of civilian casualties v. militants, but instead to ask how many of the total dead were the sort of high-value enemies the program is supposed to be targeting. If we approach the question from this angle, the hit-rate of the drone campaign is abysmal, despite the fact that most of its victims have been “militants.”
RootsAction.org co-founder Norman Solomon praised the US Department of Justice's apparent decision to drop its threat to imprison author and journalist James Risen unless he reveals his source in reporting the story of Operation Merlin.
RootsAction.org coordinated the petition campaign "We Support James Risen Because We Support a Free Press." Addressed to Attorney General Eric Holder and President Obama, the petition -- which gained more than 100,000 signers this year -- told Holder and Obama: "We urge you in the strongest terms to halt all legal action against Mr. Risen and to safeguard the freedom of journalists to maintain the confidentiality of their sources."