Speakout is Truthout's treasure chest for bloggy, quirky, personally reflective, or especially activism-focused pieces. Speakout articles represent the perspectives of their authors, and not those of Truthout.
In 2008, the Obama Administration made eye-popping headlines by announcing a 10-year, $80 billion nuclear weapons development program. In 2009, Mr. Obama promised to pursue a “world without nuclear weapons,” but that was then.
By 2010, new warhead plans had grown to an estimated $355 billion, decade-long cash cow that amounts to a cool $1 trillion over 30 years. The colossal expense has already been generally adopted by the House and Senate in military authorization bills -- according to the Sept. 22 New York Times.
Kabul - “I woke up with the blast of another bomb explosion this morning,” Imadullah told me. “I wonder how many people were killed.” Imadullah, an 18 year old Afghan Peace Volunteer, (APV), from Badakhshan, had joined me at the APVs’ Borderfree Community Centre of Nonviolence.
The news reported that at least three Afghan National Army soldiers were killed in the suicide bomb attack, in the area of Darulaman. Coincidentally, the Afghan Peace Volunteers (APVs) had planned to be at the Darulaman Palace that same morning. To commemorate Gandhi’s birthday and the International Day of Nonviolence, we wanted to form a human circle of peace at the Palace, which is a war ruin. But the police, citing general security concerns, had denied us permission.
Washington, DC – Today, consumer and worker rights groups filed a joint amicus curiae brief with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the case of Food & Water Watch v. USDA. The lawsuit challenges the agency's New Poultry Inspection System (NPIS) rules, a plan modeled after the agency's controversial pilot program that USDA's own employees have fervently opposed.
Organizations listed on the brief include the Government Accountability Project (GAP), Consumer Federation of America, Center for Foodborne Illness, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Nebraska Appleseed.
Women engaged in peaceful animal rights advocacy in India were attacked in September by a mob of angry men outraged by their presence on a public street. The Western press's reaction has been typical. The Washington Times decried the "Muslim mob" that descended on the women, failing to note that the women were themselves apparently Muslim. Another conservative journal was more explicit in its discriminatory bias: "These Liberals Might Stop Saying Islam Is Peaceful After What Just Happened To Them." Of course neither press account noted the mass violence against women that occurs in the United States, a predominantly Christian country, with nearly one in five women experiencing sexual assault.
A group of social activists in Brazil, concerned with how the outcome of the upcoming nationwide elections would impact on the LGBT community, launched a nonpartisan campaign in order to increase the pro-LGBT representation within political parties and Brazilian legislature.
The #VoteLGBT campaign is mapping all candidates running for the Senate, the Lower House and the Legislative houses of each of the 27 states in Brazil who advocate civil rights for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and trans persons. “In Brazil, political institutions rarely represent the diversity of the country’s population. They are usually taken over by individuals who are committed to maintaining the privileges of a certain portion of society, denying or ignoring the rights of minorities, and the elections are the moment we can change that,” says Gui Mohallem, one of the campaign coordinators.
Reports on the destruction of the climate continue to clearly indicate that environmental groups are not doing enough to slow climate change. There is a great need for a larger, more powerful network and some new strategies.
The leaders of the more than 120 nation states that made pie-in-the-sky, non-binding promises for reductions in carbon emissions at the UN meeting and dozens of powerful corporations have moved on.
What type of society do we live in which I’m not able to have the same opportunities as others, in which my future is unsure, my immigration status puts a limit to what I can and can’t do? If you aren't a permanent resident or a citizen of the United States you have to work far harder in order to reach your dreams.
I was originally born in Hidalgo, Mexico in 1997. Like many other kids, I did not have a choice in coming to the United States. At the age of 3 my parents decided that it would be best if I came to San Francisco to live with them. And if you were to ask me where I was born I’d say here ,San Francisco, not because I’m ashamed of being Mexican but because I've lived here for as long as I can remember.
The controversy in the United States is whether the fault of racial and economic injustice lies with the individuals or the system. Some see poverty and racial inequality as a result of personal choices, while others see it as a result of government or systemic injustice. Lots of people have the ideology that working hard and getting an education will make you successful. Very few see the reality that individuals are at the mercy of the system, which determines their success from the day that they are born. According to Revolution Newspaper, “People like Bill Cosby as well as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - not only go so far as to blame Black people for the horrendous situation into which this system has shoved them, with its dead end set of “choices”, they do so with a phony pose of concern of Black people.” This shows that the problems people of color (mainly Blacks) face in the US are created by the system and the only way to end this is creating a new system.