Speakout is Truthout's treasure chest for bloggy, quirky, personally reflective, or especially activism-focused pieces. Speakout articles represent the perspectives of their authors, and not those of Truthout.
To be fair, the Affordable Care Act has brought some kind of coverage to about 20 million Americans, in good part through the expansion of Medicaid in 32 states (including DC) and the subsidized exchanges. But its negative results far outweigh its gains. Given this dysfunctional reality under the ACA, it's remarkable that neither major political party has a plan to truly fix the situation.
Who in the United States can provide the best solutions for promoting democracy: is it the majority of the people, or the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court? One of the checks and balances the Constitution provides is a method to amend the Constitution, ensuring the people have the last say and most power in our political system. In United States history, this check has been used as a response to Supreme Court decisions that hurt democracy.
In his famous Black nationalist speech, "The Ballot or the Bullet," Malcolm X encourages organizing Black political and economic power, with a scathing critique on accountability and return on investment to African Americans for being loyal Democrats. How can Black people place their hopes in a Democratic president offering empty promises, who will ultimately take their votes for granted?
The largest police union, the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), adores and endorses Trump because of his outspoken support of law and order, his promise to "give the power back to police," his praise of "stop-and-frisk" and his dismissal of allegations of police brutality as a false narrative. My forthcoming book, Blue Mafia: Police Brutality and Consent Decrees in Ohio, gives a vivid and disturbing portrait of what to expect in terms of police brutality under a Donald Trump presidency.
It is always difficult, philosophically speaking, to establish what we can know, of ourselves, others and the world around us. Diagnosis, like interpretation, is difficult. If both miss the mark, remedy and understanding remain ineffective. Our search to understand in the realm of politics already assumes the existence of a common understanding for which we are in search. Dictatorial regimes do not have to make this effort because there is no clashing partisanship, no need to package an understanding that will confront a challenging packaged understanding.
If I was driving around today in a 1960s Chevrolet Corvair, claiming it was new and state-of-the-art, I'd likely be a laughingstock. (Even in the mid-1960s, it would have been a hard sell, thanks to the pioneering consumer safety work of Ralph Nader and his landmark book, Unsafe At Any Speed.) But that's exactly the spin the Tennessee Valley Authority and, more prominently, desperate nuclear boosters, are trying to put on Watts Bar 2, the first "new" and "21st century" US nuclearreactor.
Medical students are becoming strong advocates all over the country for expanded and improved Medicare for All. Spurred on by their increasing awareness of the restricted access, unaffordability, and inequities keeping many Americans from necessary health care, they are organizing and making their voices heard about the urgency of real health care reform. With the co-sponsorship of the American Medical Student Association, the Latino Medical Student Association, White Coats for Black Lives, and many regional and local groups, a good example of their activism was the Halloween Day event in Boston a few days ago.
This is the second time the president has spoken about the Dakota Access pipeline, and it is good news to the protesters at Standing Rock, especially after the violence that made news last week. Many see it as a beacon of hope in an otherwise dark sky. When the president speaks about the issue you've been fighting for, it's hard not to feel hopeful. However, President Obama's statement may be a false victory for protesters. It is clear that the president did not commit to any course of action. Taken in context, his statement is decidedly noncommittal.
Facts are the foundation of democracy. Without a clear handle on them, we can't possibly hope to make the informed decisions on which representative government inherently rests. They're the life blood of any healthy democratic system, yet according to an increasing number of opinions, we're now inhabiting an age of post-factual or post-truth democracy. According to organs ranging from the Los Angeles Times to The Washington Post, we now have for company not principled people who rely on well-supported arguments for their political legitimacy, but liars such as Donald Trump and Fox News.
It's been an incredibly strange political year. While American politics has been imbued by anti-intellectualism for decades, the failure of both our political leaders and the electorate to care about facts, evidence, and truth has reached epic proportions with the rise of Donald Trump. Sure, there's a long history of politicians lying for their own self-benefit. Bill Clinton lied about his extramarital affairs, George W. Bush duped the country about why we invaded Iraq, and Barack Obama once promised that he would create a "public option health plan."