The Audacity of Ruin: Risk-Adverse President Enables High-Risk, Rogue Driller
Friday 23 July 2010
by: Robert S. Becker, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

President Barack Obama sits next to Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour as he is debriefed about the ongoing response to the BP oil spill. (Photo: Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
Iraq and Afghanistan are not yet wholly "Obama's wars," but the White House's piece-meal, deferential retreat from out-of-control Gulf deluge has become his and his alone. The Big Spill dramatizes, furthermore, how a once savvy politician squanders his first, best opportunity to redeem a steadily faltering presidency.
If heroes emerge by resolving daunting dilemmas, especially man-made, this paragon of caution remains pedestrian and reactive, as he plays it safe by risking the safety of the Gulf. Yet, when a risk-adverse president relegates the safety, and survival, of our most valuable coastal region to the reckless polluter who imperils it, he ironically turns high-stake gambler by default. Failure to act under challenge qualifies as enabling an addict, and BP certainly qualifies, repeatedly enjoining all the world in its reckless oil misadventures.
In fact, the Gulf faces a multiple of crises, beyond 3,850 oil rigs, fragmentary Katrina restoration and massive overfishing, all competing with the Big Spill. There's an oxygen-depleted, agriculture-induced "dead zone" the size of New Jersey just west of the oil slick, in part resulting from upstream corn-ethanol obsessions. As to which is worse, spill or dead zone, "it's a really tough call," says Nathaniel Ostrom, Michigan State zoologist, "There's no real answer to that question."
No Claim of Ignorance
On July 5, The Wall Street Journal reported a federal circuit court a year ago shocked the Obama administration by calling "irrational" its environment oil spill restoration plans, judging this government "unprepared for a major spill at sea." Bingo. Echoing Bush-Cheney machinations, Obama's Department of Justice (DOJ) pressured the court to reverse itself, thus permitting - guess what? - the BP-Deepwater Horizon time bomb shellacking the Gulf like a tsunami. Double bingo.
If there's White House guilt from such judicial chicanery, it's invisible, along with obliviousness to tying your political tail to the BP tiger. Today, AP reported BP already has a "backup for its [relief well] back-up" gambit. "The relief well itself is not a slam dunk," said Gene Beck, Texas A&M petroleum professor, and no guarantee even two relief wells can stop the flow. Considering BP estimates two billion pressured gallons of oil in this reservoir, AP concludes, "History is on BP's side, but the depth of the seafloor isn't."
Imagine what "life zones" endure if 20 times today's sludge pollutes the Gulf? Perhaps, the $10 billion in annual federal oil surtaxes clamped down administration judgment. Think even $20 billion of unsecured BP promissory notes will handle that? Though the party colors differ, we're in W. territory, so politically blinkered. this White House obscures the magnitude of disaster, presidential options, or courage to follow its own chief of staff, "You never want a serious crisis go to waste." This one is wasting away, in every sense of the word.
Obama Blowing Redemption
Paralysis and omission, especially against emergencies, kill more presidencies than blunders allowing defensive, political spin. Military fiascoes didn't kill W., but abandoning his own besieged Gulf citizens did. Redemptive presidential moments are few and far between, and Obama is blowing his best shot. Recall LBJ on Vietnam, Nixon on Watergate, Carter with Iran, or every president since Reagan - willful blindness outpoints initial errors and tarnishes legacies.
Though destructive Bush-Cheney deregulation invited big oil spills, Obama facilitated the time bomb, favoring offshore drilling and bad permits. Congress is no great help, nor is the public, especially since the media has been shackled by nasty censorship, prohibiting upfront reporting or photography. A fuming Anderson Cooper assailed press restrictions, channeled from Obama's point man, Thad Allen, to buy every local tin badge or hired BP gun.
The Triple Whammy
The Big Spill called for a wider S.O.S. as dire as for Katrina (with larger range and duration of impacts). The result - a triple whammy, fueling the mother of all spills that feeds on itself:
- First Crisis: oil inundation caused by gross negligence by the riskiest hustler in the oil patch, thus, not just the worst Gulf disaster, nor this country's, but history's worst man-made "accident."
- Second Crisis: collusion and incompetence allow the polluter to handle cleanup, the dumbest idea since Iraq. No alarms or red flags meant inept monitoring and dubious nonfixes. The AWOL Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) didn't control toxic dispersants, nor apply the Endangered Species Act to restrain outrages (burning live sea turtles, maybe halted by private suit).
- Third Crisis: irreparable Damage, the Gulf Oil Kill, the Big Spill. Underreported magnitude; paucity of response; warmer, worse water conditions all amplify uninterrupted assaults: hurricanes, oil rig spills, overfishing, coastal erosion and unspeakable volumes of pollution from industrial, agriculture, sewage, now oil.
Unsurprisingly, as the ruination widens, the political pressure instills more denial, more tunnel vision, more press clampdowns. It's Bush all over: pray what you ignore and deny will go away. Handcuffing the press parallels the Bush refusal to display Iraqi body bags, though we always knew more about Iraq than we now know about Gulf decimation, like actual size.
Do you like this? Click here to get Truthout stories sent to your inbox every day - free.
Politics for a Pragmatist
So, what could President Obama have done and still do differently? Show leadership, take command, use this challenge to exemplify politics can change. Raise, not bury, consciousness: prove here is no mere "political problem."
First, establish and admit the magnitude, concede slavish responses, misplaced confidence in BP and end virtual media censorship. Trust the public can take bad news, but not indirection. Order the EPA to inspect BP's cover-up; guarantee no marine life gets burned alive; fund protection for threatened wildlife, especially species facing extinction. Initiate investigations to withhold BP's valuable licenses as well as criminal behavior, at BP and MMS. Rework not just rules, but the system of regulation.
Second, order all Allen and federal agencies - Coast Guard, Army Corps, the EPA and Defense Department - to act on behalf of the Gulf and residents, not BP's insurance mentality. Listen to outside, independent ocean scientists, petroleum and environmentalist veterans, and involve the UN and make this international in scope.
Third: Act like this is the Battle of the Gulf, which it is, worse than 9/11. Assail "drill, baby, drill" advocacy; lower national speed limits; mandate national conservation, real and symbolic. Punish drillers for acting like masters of the universe. Give a far bolder Oval Office speech that commits to truly integrated, national energy planning (beyond ethanol, oil drilling, and nuclear). Demand a region-wide, New Deal-like plan that integrates Gulf commerce and employment with sustainability and wildlife protection.
Make Fat Cats Hate You
Why doesn't this president realize commanding this emergency offers his best political redemption? Start the re-election campaign in the Gulf by obliterating GOP-BP boot lickers. Like FDR, make some entrenched powers hate you. Regain popularity as the sustainable jobs, alternative energy president and limit, don't enable, earth-killing energy usage and mining. Become a mensch.
Will Obama do any of this? Doubtful, for mediocrity is safe, though more of the same jeopardizes Democratic leadership of Congress. To all those Obama defenders, this president is not doing his best under bad conditions: he is doing badly under bad conditions, replicating failed presidencies since Reagan.
This oil inundation is a once-a-century disaster, and effective relief wells could deflect my worst-case scenarios. Never before, however, have we jeopardized an entire region while endorsing more drilling. "Better late than never" fails when ecosystems pass beyond tipping points, where no birds sing and marine mammals become fossils for fossil fuels.
For ten weeks, we've been "up the creek without a paddle," but time and amplitude are pushing us into deeper waters, misinformed, pilot-less and awash with oil sludge. Not just for political, but moral and environmental reasons, Obama risks all by not salvaging the wreckage.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.
Support Truthout's work with a $10/month tax-deductible donation today!




Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
The truth is that this WH
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 18:02 β Prudence (not verified)The truth is that this WH has no real insight on how to lead this country. Soon he will be totally ignored. And his henchmen that have sold the American people down the drain, will have to live with the jobless consequences (hopefully theres).
Obama is doing in the Gulf
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 19:17 β Donald Broder (not verified)Obama is doing in the Gulf what he is doing everywhere else: take the way that seemingly offends the fewest people at the time. Never mind that his solutions are really not solutions to the very serious problems not to mention catastrophes like the Gulf and our wars, by now we can count on him to show timidity and half measures where bold leadership is called for. He is becoming a good bet for a one-term presidency and making possible the election of a certifiable right-wing crazy in 2012.
Remember Naomi Klein's
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 21:01 β Anonymous-Non-Sheeple (not verified)Remember Naomi Klein's "Disaster Capitalism", Robert. This disaster is not going to waste. The "NeoLibCONS" will profit from it one way or another, and most likely in many ways; primarily, no doubt, by using it to do away with more liberties and freedoms in the U.S., and to cement more of the "national security", control state that the "BushCON" began and the "ObamaCON" appears to be "finishing", or least taking much further along on its way to complete totalitarianism in the United States.
"Regulation" like the present-passed, so-called financial "re-regulation", will probably be passed and signed by Obama, but it will be shot full of loopholes and mostly-unenforced clauses, as the "new" financial "regulation" most likely is.
Also, undoubtedly the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster was intentionally allowed to happen, like 9/11 at-minimum was. These pirates and profiteers don't care about the environment, except as they can exploit it to its fullest extent possible. Obama was chosen and selected as a "company man", a corporate-fascist "team player, and globalist front man to put a pretty face on destroying the U.S. and ushering in the "New World Order (NWO)" of complete global governance, eradication of all True Liberties and Freedoms, and total worldwide enslavement, doing away with all nation-states' sovereignty and independence, including that of the United States.
So, you're right, Robert, Obama is not going to take up leadership, and is not going to do anything but a paltry response to this unmitigated disaster, anymore than he's done anything about, or is truly going to do anything about, the unmitigated disasters of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Palestine, etc.
Obama isn't in control; and he wasn't selected and chosen to be in control, but only to bring about and/or allow the destruction of the U.S. and the world by the globalists; and to make it appear that bringing in one-world government and religion (global enslavement under Roman Catholic counterfeit "Christianity") is our only salvation from the woes of the world, the engineered "chaos-by-design" that the globalist corporate-fascists bring about, and/or allow to happen, get worse and use to profit from obscenely.
Thus, "me-thinks" that, because of Obama's no doubt intentional present ineptitude (by the will and instruction of the globalist oligarchs of the "Fifth Estate", the international shadow government who rules and controls the world, including the U.S.), he is apparently meant to be only a "one-term President".
(But all sure-bets are off, except those that the global-elitist corporate-fascists control through the disasters that they design, engineer and/or allow, and know are coming; like the "put-options" that they "sure-thing-'gamble'" on as they did with 9/11 and the present Gulf disaster---just one example of their profiting off the latest disaster in any way they can.)
Non-Sheeple is right. Obama
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 21:46 β Sven (not verified)Non-Sheeple is right. Obama was pre-selected (as the favored candidate) by the corporatists/Corporate Media as one who could be totally controlled, submissive while sounding good to the ordinary folks who saw the consequences of the Cheney/Bush/MIC/BigOil cabal. During the presidential campaign I wondered why conservative apologists like David Brooks extolled the virtues of "Democrat" Obama, now we can see why (no real change).
We need Congr. Grayson to challenge Obama or Sen. Bernie Sanders to run for President. Biden would even do better than Obama.
Sven, I was with you
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 22:16 β Anonymous-Non-Sheeple (not verified)Sven, I was with you completely until you promoted Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden as potential 2012 presidential candidates. Bernie sanders is an evil two-faced, sellout much worse than Kucinich; and Joe Biden having been selected to be part of the Obama sellout camp, makes him as evil as Bernie Sanders if not more so. Neither of them are truly Constitutionalists, and both are traitors to the Constitution. Obviously, Biden and Sanders are corporatist "bad-old-boys" and globalist sellouts of U.S. liberty(ies), freedom(s) and sovereignty; so they are most-definitely NOT an answer for truly-Constitutionally-viable presidential candidates, unless we want more of the same destruction of the Bill of Rights and the U.S. itself.
Ok Non-Sheeple, I see you do
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 23:13 β Sven (not verified)Ok Non-Sheeple, I see you do not like Sanders or Biden (I just said that Biden would be better than Obama, but he is not my first choice by far). You should offer some solutions going forward. Who is your electable guy(s) to solve the U.S. mess? How would you go about revising the system? Which nation has the government system closest to your ideals??
Don't forget or add to this
Fri, 07/23/2010 - 23:57 β Anonymous (not verified)Don't forget or add to this disaster, DISPERSANTS!!!!
HOW STUPID IS EVERYBODY!!!
IS NOONE IS LISTENING!!!!
IF YOU LIVE IN THE AREA OF THE SPILL AND AROUND THE NIGHT FLIGHT SPRAYING OF DISPERSANTS. LEAVE YOUR HOME NOW PRIOR TO LONG LASTING HEALTH PROBLEMS FOR YOUR CHILDREN.
I AM GLAD OBAMA IS BRING HIS FAMILY TO THE GULF FOR A VACATION. HIS CHILDREN WILL EDUCATE PRESIDENT OBAMA.
I HOPE HIS CHILDREN SAY AWAY FROM THE WATER. IT IS TOXIC DUE TO DISPERSANTS!!!!!!!
Sven, Biden is NOT better
Sat, 07/24/2010 - 01:09 β Anonymous-Non-Sheeple (not verified)Sven, Biden is NOT better than Obama, and that is one of the points that I alluded to, although indirectly.
No one is an electable solution. All politicians, including the "better" ones are corrupt, and/or they are controlled opposition, or they will very quickly, on both sides of the aisle, bow down to tons of lobbyists and corporate-fascist threats and/or pressure.
The ONLY way to solve the U.S. mess is for the majority of the People to revolt, carry out a revolution, and completely take back the government from the corporate-fascists.
No government system is closest to my ideals. They're all soldout and co-opted in some way(s).
ANS: you are far off base on
Sat, 07/24/2010 - 03:38 β Ken Hall (not verified)ANS: you are far off base on Bernie Sanders. He could be a great president, one who believes in community, in the power of We The People, and the mandate of gov't to enable all citizens to realize their full potential. He was a very popular mayor, working for his constituents and building community, before he went to congress, where he fights with little support to further the interests of the common man. He is one of the few in congress that I count on to go to bat for the common citizen. I don't know where you're coming from, but to use the word "evil" to describe an opponent or someone you don't like hearkens back to Bush years, it's not at all enlightening or specific, like calling a painting "beautiful". You'll have to be more specific.
Bipartisan bystander Obama
Sat, 07/24/2010 - 16:58 β Anonymous (not verified)Bipartisan bystander Obama is the disaster.
He has no leadership skills.
We had a chance to make significant change.
This clown squandered it at every opportunity.
He's an empty suit.
Progressives need to launch a significant primary challenge in 2012. Obama is one term in any case.
Ken, you keep falling for
Sat, 07/24/2010 - 22:43 β Anonymous-Non-Sheeple (not verified)Ken, you keep falling for these career politicians, NONE OF WHICH do I fall for in any way, shape, form or fashion whatsoever. What has Bernie Sanders voted for, or against? Did he vote for the Afghanistan and/or Iraq wars? Did he vote for the "U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act", Part 1? Did he vote for the renewal of the said Act through Parts 2 and 3? Did he vote for the "Homeland Security Act", creating the "neo-Nazi", and/or neo-corporate-fascist, "Department of Homeland Security", etc.? Did he vote for the "Military Commissions Act" and/or the "John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007" (both in 2006), etc.? Does he vote for the monetary appropriations to continue the Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan wars? Did he vote for the completely unconstitutional "legalization" of the totally illegal spying on the American people, and retroactive immunity for the criminal telecoms? Did he vote for the T.A.R.P. bailouts? Etc.?
If Bernie Sanders, or anyone else in Congress, voted for, or "Yea" for, ANY, or even one, of the foregoing treasons against God, The People, the country, the Constitution and Bill of Rights, other U.S. law(s), International law(s) and treaties, and against the entire world, he and/or they is and/or are NOT (a) person and/or people "who believe(s) in community, in the power of We The People, and the mandate of gov't to enable all citizens to realize their full potential", are NOT for "the interests of the common man", or who "go to bat for the common citizen"; but are traitors to God, to The People, to the country, to the Constitution and Bill of Rights, to other U.S. law(s), to International law(s), and to the entire world; and that makes them evil.
Let us get it right shall
Sun, 07/25/2010 - 00:02 β Anonymous (not verified)Let us get it right shall we: Obama is a politician not a leader. FDR was a leader. Winston Churchill was a leader. Harry Truman was a leader. Teddy R was a leader. Obama is a sheep being sheered by the GOP and LOVIN IT because the buck stops at his bankers. Who cares if he is a one time president. He is an all time loser. And so are the people of this nation who believed he could at least try to make it different. He never even tried.