Facebook Slider
Get News Alerts!

STEVEN JONAS FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaCPAC(Photo: Gage Skidmore)For those of you who might not know (and I should think that most political types would, given the massive publicity on media of all stripes the event gets) something called the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) took place over this past weekend. It was funny, because when I heard about this year's event I thought "wait a minute; didn't they have one of these of few months ago?" No, I'm not losing it yet. That's just some evidence as to exactly how much the annual shindig is talked about.

And so I looked it up, and came across a Rightist website called The Daily Signal. (Sorry, folks, I am just no longer calling the folks who go to these things and their related media and political figures "conservatives." They ain't. Actually, in terms of wanting to preserve and conserve what is left of the Earth as a result of the depredations of capitalist imperialism, it is we Leftists who are the conservatives. "Reactionary" is a bit old-fashioned, so I'm going with the simple descriptive, "Rightist.") They ran a feature called "25 Takeaways from America's Biggest Conservative (sic) Conference." It is fascinating to see what Rightists take away from a Rightist conference. But for the most part following their order, I thought to note down what I took away, first from parts of their "Top 25," and then from perhaps a few observations of my own.

First, Scott Walker. Although his "trade-unionists are the equivalent of ISIS" remarks was first widely reported as a gaffe, and he may have backed away from it a bit, believe me, deep down inside (which is where the remark came from) this very successful Rightist politician (he won there elections in four years in a supposedly "blue" state) bleeds Koch Brother royal blue from his veins. For the Kochs, that tiny percentage of the US workforce that is still unionized is one of their biggest enemies. And it is Walker's too.

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

abibiboehnerThe Dick Cheney of Israel and his co-conspirator, John Boehner. (Image: DonkeyHotey)

House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi was clearly furious in the wake of yesterday's speech by Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi). The Washington Post reported:

In a statement, Pelosi said she was "near tears" throughout the speech, "saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States . . . and saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation."

Netanyahu's speech was made before a special session of Congress on Tuesday. Remember that Netanyahu violated protocol by accepting a prearranged invitation from House Speaker John Boehner (normally the Senate jointly issues such an invite - and the president is consulted) to address the session - which many Democrats refused to attend. 

Commentators have offered several reasons for why Netanyahu would make the unprecedented remarks he tossed into his speech - including his assertion that he "was betting the bank" that he could influence US politics and foreign policy, at the cost of alienating the president. Netanyahu was also taking the risk of choosing to side with Republicans as a permanent party allied with Israel, along with an additional pool of Democrats who follow the directives of The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

REV. BILLY TALEN FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaBillyPancaked(Photo: Fred Askew)Since last summer, we have lived through this remarkable movement called Black Lives Matter.

So much is revealed in this movement's beginnings. How did this little township in St. Louis do this? How can it be that a patch of sidewalk in front of a police station in Ferguson, Missouri, would become the stage for the world's conscience? Is it only because local black youth refused to stop shouting there? This is the exhilarating return to the actual magic of free speech.

And now, the future. The outlines of the difficult challenge that we face in the future is shown by the legal (or illegal) end-game of this movement. The police are watching us go back to consumer society, putting wires back in our ears, withdrawing from the streets and parks – and they are attacking the remaining protesters, who now have less protection.

In November we received the disheartening news from Ferguson. Protest leaders were now being taken into custody, assigned a crime, and issued a bail level that was so high that they could not leave prison. It was a Machiavellian tactic to separate the most effective activists from their work out in public space. The human rights advocate Joan Baez helped us send them money.

Since last summer, we have lived through this remarkable movement called Black Lives Matter.

So much is revealed in this movement’s beginnings.  How did this little township in St. Louis do this?  How can it be that a patch of sidewalk in front of a police station in Ferguson, Missouri, would become the stage for the world’s conscience?  Is it only because local black youth refused to stop shouting there?  This is the exhilarating return to the actual magic of free speech.

And now, the future. The outlines of the difficult challenge that we face in the future is shown by the legal (or illegal) end-game of this movement. The police are watching us go back to consumer society, putting wires back in our ears, withdrawing from the streets and parks – and they are attacking the remaining protesters, who now have less protection.

In November we received the disheartening news from Ferguson.  Protest leaders were now being taken into custody, assigned a crime, and issued a bail level that was so high that they could not leave prison.  It was a Machiavellian tactic to separate the most effective activists from their work out in public space. The human rights advocate Joan Baez helped us send them money.

Tuesday, 03 March 2015 13:26

Beyond Keystone XL

CARL POPE OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaObamaEcoWatch1(Photo: EcoWatch)President Obama’s veto last week of a Republican bill passed—precisely so that he would veto it—mandating the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline does, indeed, as former NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg pointed out, serve as “a perfect symbol of Washington’s dysfunction.” Obama made it clear that this veto, at least, was over the process, not the substance, and the Republicans had set the process up so that no self-respecting President could do other than veto.

In their last PR foray before the veto, tar sands proponents offered up an IHS-CERA study which asserted that, facts to the contrary, approving Keystone would increase the reliable supplies of oil for domestic consumers. The study asserted “the overwhelming majority” of oil flowing to refineries in the Gulf Coast would be refined and consumed in the U.S., even after XL is built—which is true, but irrelevant. If I pour a glass of water (Keystone XL) into an already full bucket (Midwest and Gulf Coal oil markets) most of the water stays in the bucket—but the bucket does not hold any more water—the increment just slops on the floor, or in this case gets exported.

The President focused on a more relevant point in his comments in Fargo last week, saying that “I’ve already said I’m happy to look at increasing pipeline production for U.S. oil. But Keystone is for Canadian oil. Sending it down to the Gulf it bypasses the U.S., it estimated to create 250, maybe, 300 permanent jobs. We should be focusing on American infrastructure for American jobs for American producers … ”

Keystone is an enormously important environmental symbol. But it is also a commercial struggle. Alberta tar sands oil and North Dakota light shale oil flows into the same markets, have access to the same refineries, and rely on the same pipelines and railroads to get them to the same customers. So it was never terribly plausible that Keystone would be good for the U.S.—it was designed to make Canadian oil more competitive in global markets, which, on balance, is not good for American producers or, since the Canadians want to escape from American markets, American consumers.

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

abillofantasyFantasy indeed! (Photo: bradalmanac)

Brian Williams' mendacious embellishments are starting to look minor compared to the surge of revelations that Bill O'Reilly lied about his experiences in danger zones. 

As The Washington Post reported on February 27,

O’Reilly has spent the past eight days vigorously defending himself on a variety of statements that don’t square with other eyewitness accounts. He has blasted and even threatened those who have called his comments into question, particularly Mother Jones magazine, which touched off the examination of his record with a story about his statements regarding his role in the aftermath of the Falklands conflict....

Fox News has stood by O’Reilly throughout the controversy, which appears to have bolstered his TV ratings. The network released figures Friday showing that his weekly audience grew by 11 percent compared with the same period last year.

A spokesman also reiterated the network’s earlier statement of support for its star: "Bill O’Reilly has already addressed several claims leveled against him. This is nothing more than an orchestrated campaign by far-left advocates Mother Jones and Media Matters. Responding to the unproven accusation du jour has become an exercise in futility. FOX News maintains its staunch support of O’Reilly, who is no stranger to calculated onslaughts."

O'Reilly's indignant, bellicose responses to the proof that he lied about several incidents - so as to enhance the image that he was an intrepid, fearless reporter - only enhances his role as the iconic TV defender of white male entitlement. If Fox is to be believed - which is a big if - his ratings have gone up among his primarily white geriatric male audience.

BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaCash1(Photo: Colin Brown)Despite raising $13 million dollars, the organization called The National Draft Ben Carson for President “isn’t affiliated with Ben Carson and the small percentage of money it spent on independent expenditures didn’t go to him” More than a few right-wing PACS make “large payments to vendors who were owned by people who worked for the PAC,” and contribute little to causes and candidates it professes to be raising money for.

Those are a few of the revelations a researcher uncovered after he was hired by John Hawkins to investigate how a number of conservative organizations were spending the millions of dollars in donations they raised from their supporters.

John Hawkins is profoundly conservative. His right-wing credentials are impeccable. He runs a website called Right Wing News, which posts stories from a who’s who of conservative columnists and bloggers. He has authored numerous liberal-bashing articles including: “5 Reasons Liberals Hate Soldiers Like Chris Kyle,” “15 Statistics That Destroy Liberal Narratives,” “Refuting 7 Lies Liberals Have Told Millennials About Conservatives,” and “On Behalf of the Patriarchy, Liberal Feminists Can Kiss Off.”

While recognizing that “Reports about sleazy activities by conservative groups have not exactly been in short supply over the last couple of years, … pop[ing] up in the Daily Beast, Mother Jones, Washington Post, the Politico and at the Daily Caller among other outlets,” many conservatives were pre-disposed to write them off as liberal “hit pieces,” Hawkins wrote in a February 20 Right Wing News piece headlined, “50 Million Down The Tubes: How 17 Conservative PACs Are Spending Their Money.”

2015.2.03Ecowatch(Photo: EcoWatch)KELLY LEVIN AND C. FORBES TOMPKINS OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Article reprinted with permission from EcoWatch.

More than 98 inches of snow has fallen in Boston this season, while workers have spent about 170,000 hours plowing the streets and distributed more than 76,000 tons of salt on roadways. At the same time, much of the American West, Rocky Mountains, and Northern and Central Plains have experienced warmer-than-average temperatures. California, in the grip of an epic drought, had its fourth-driest January ever recorded with just 15 percent of average precipitation.

So what is going on with this extreme weather, and what does it have to do with global climate change?

Due to recent analytical advancements, climate scientists are now able to more accurately determine how climate change impacts the odds of an individual extreme event occurring.

More research is planned in coming years to examine links between extreme weather and climate events and climate change, and global research already tells us a lot about the trends, including these three counterintuitive connections between climate change and extreme events:

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

akochcarnivalThe cancer of the Koch brothers' ideology is metastasizing through the body politic. (Image: DonkeyHotey)

The Koch brothers' philosophy of the consolidation of wealth by the few is spreading like a cancer. Just look at how their hand-picked governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker - who received massive financial backing from the Kochs - is now being touted in the corporate media as a Republican contender for president in 2016.

Walker, who never graduated from college (leaving Marquette University in Milwaukee for mysterious reasons), has mercilessly attacked education in Wisconsin - starting with the teachers unions and recently extending to the University of Wisconsin. 

On February 22, Kevin O'Marah wrote in a Forbes op-ed:

Gov. Scott Walker plans to cut $300M from the budget of the University of Wisconsin and, if he has his way, will alter its mission from a “search for truth” to “meeting the state’s workforce needs.”  These steps are so fantastically at odds with what the business community, economy and state need from its public university system that no synonym for ‘stupid’ is too strong.

It should be no surprise then that the newly inaugurated governor of Illinois, Bruce Rauner - a darling of the 1% - is metastasizing the Koch brothers' attack on an educated public

2015.2.03 Bucheit2There are at least four good reasons why America's young adults - and their parents - should take up the fight against financial firms. (Photo: Andrew Bossi / Flickr)PAUL BUCHHEIT FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Hell No, We Won't Go --1967
No Way, We Won't Pay --2015

Fifty years ago students burned their draft cards to protest an immoral war against the people of Vietnam. Today it's a different kind of war, immoral in another way, waged against young Americans of approximately the same age, and threatening them in a manner that endangers not their lives but their livelihoods.

There are at least four good reasons why America's young adults - and their parents - should take up the fight against financial firms who are holding high-interest student loans that total more than the nation's credit card debt, and more than the total income of the poorer half of America.

MARCUS ERIKSEN OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

aaaPlasticPollution(Photo: EcoWatch)The idea that there are “patches” of trash in the oceans is a myth created 15 years ago that should be abandoned in favor of “plastic smog,” like massive clouds of microplastics that emanate out of the five subtropical gyres. My recent publication in the journal Plos One, estimates 269,000 tons of plastic from 5.25 trillion particles, but more alarming than that is it’s mostly microplastic (>92 percent in our study) and most of the plastic in the ocean is likely not on the sea surface.

Recent research has shown microplastics in ice cores, across the seafloor, vertically throughout the ocean and on every beach worldwide.  The little stuff is everywhere.

If you follow the life of plastic in the oceans, as we have done for 50,000 miles since 2009, you find the large items leaving coastlines in droves, then it rapidly shreds as it migrates toward the calmer waters of the subtropical gyres where sunlight, waves and nibbling fish rip it to micro-size particles smaller than a grain of rice. Microplastic then flow through the bodies of billions of organisms, making their way out of the gyres to deeper currents, and ultimately the seafloor. That’s the end-life of plastic.

Visualize the problem as “plastic smog” much like the way you can look up and visualize clouds of air pollution over cities. It’s very similar. We solved the air pollution problem by stopping the source with better emission controls on cars and power plants. There were people that suggested sucking air pollution out of the sky, but because people could look up and see the problem they understood that only stopping the source would work. The exact same logic applies to microplastic pollution in the world’s oceans. Because there are only a handful of scientists that understand ocean plastic pollution, and the public largely relies on the media for information, there’s an unusual amount of attention given to ideas to suck up plastic from the sea.

Page 1 of 1342