MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The other night, I was watching a historical documentary on World War I. That conflict, which was supposed to be "The War to End All Wars," resulted in the deaths of approximately 38 million people: soldiers and civilians. Barely 20 years later, the rumblings of the World War II had begun, which would result in the murders of more than 70 million people.
At the end of the First World War, the British government undertook a propaganda campaign to justify the senseless and barbaric bloodletting that had occurred, resulting in approximately one million British soldiers killed and more than two million wounded. The government built a series of monuments honoring "The Glorious Dead" -- using a memorial slogan invented to justify the war as a great worthwhile "sacrifice." Architects were contracted to build memorials around the British Empire with either that phrasing or the more embracing slogan "Our Glorious Dead."
JAX JACOBSEN OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
study from professors at Oklahoma State University has found that Republicans and Democrats have never been so far apart on climate issues.A new
"What was once a modest tendency for Congressional Republicans to be less pro-environmental than their Democratic counterparts has become a chasm—with Republicans taking near-unanimous anti-environmental stances on relevant legislation in recent years, especially 2015," the study said.
This distance between the parties was further exacerbated by the rise of the Koch-funded Tea Party, which took the hard line of fully dismissing the climate change threat, often making climate change a lightning rod for voters who were outraged at Washington.
As they stoked fears about the U.S. government attempting to pass legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions, the Tea Party normalized climate denial throughout the Republican Party, according to Oklahoma State University's Prof. Riley E. Dunlap and Jerrod H. Yarosh, and Michigan State Associate Professor Aaron M. McCright.
Another study, cited by The Guardian Tuesday, concludes that the growth of conservative media has cemented this gap.
Conservative newspaper The Wall Street Journal was found to publish inaccurate information on the topic, according to a report by Media Matters for America.
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
San Francisco 49er quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s refusal to stand for the National Anthem as a protest against racial inequality in America is hands-down the biggest sports-related story in America. On Labor Day, in an attempt to keep up with the avalanche of new developments, I posted the following on my Facebook page:
#kaepernickchronicles, #meganrapinoerocks -- Colin Kaepernick is still making headlines in The Bay and The Nation: Latest stories include: him not showing up Sunday morning at SF's Third Baptist Church (presided over by the much revered Rev. Amos Brown), although there are questions about whether he had actually accepted the invitation; more talk about Kaepernick's girlfriend, Nessa Diab, a New York radio personality, MTV star and a Muslim, and what her political influences might be; Kaepernick and Diab's donation of $60,000 worth of school backpacks to kids in Harlem and the South Bronx; and, U.S. women's soccer national-team member Megan Rapinoe kneeling on one knee before the Seattle Reign's game on Sunday night "in a little nod to Kaepernick and everything that he's standing for right now." Rapinoe added that "it's actually pretty disgusting the way he was treated." She went on to say that as a gay American, "I know what it means to look at the flag sand not have it protect all your liberties. … It's important to have white people stand in support of people of color on this."
Just about every day since the media discovered that Kaepernick was protesting racism in America and police murders of black people by not standing for the National Anthem before the start of NFL exhibition games, sports talk radio, the nation’s sports pages, and social media has been ablaze. For Kaepernick, the media, his critics, and his supporters, it has been one heck of a ride. And it doesn’t seem to be abating anytime soon.
According to nfl.com, Kaepernick explained to NFL Media's Steve Wyche “that his decision is based on perceived societal wrongdoings against African-Americans and minorities in the U.S. ‘I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,’” Kaepernick said. "To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder."
BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
If the Hate Hillary Industry has a Godfather, that would be David Bossie. Now, Bossie, who has been toiling in the bone-yard of misinformation and disinformation, digging up skeletons and polishing them with half-truths for years, is ready for his close-up. The man who has been called a political hit man, a dirty trickster, an attack dog, and more, was recently appointed deputy campaign manager of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, tasked with a role he’s being playing for more than two decades; taking down Hillary Clinton.
Trump told The Washington Post’s Robert Costa that Bossie has been “a friend …for many years,” and that he is "Solid. Smart. Loves politics, knows how to win."
Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said that Bossie, who will take a leave of absence from Citizens United, “is a battle-tested warrior and a brilliant strategist. He's a nuts-and-bolts tactician as well, who's going to help us fully integrate our ground game and data operations, and help with overall strategy as my deputy."
Bossie is apparently closely acquainted with Trump’s new CEO and former Breitbart News head, Stephen Bannon, talk radio host Laura Ingraham. And according to The Washington Post’s Costa, Bossie is close to the family of hedge-fund investor Robert L. Mercer, who has “funded his organizations and been major backers of Trump’s candidacy.” Costa also pointed out that “Casino magnate Steve Wynn, an influential Trump ally, is also a friend of Bossie's.”
DR. DAVID SUZUKI OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Brexit vote in Britain, Donald Trump's promise to build a wall between Mexico and the U.S. and the ongoing threats and violence against ethnic minorities in many parts of the world. I'm not a political or social scientist, but my training as a biologist gives me some insight.It's been shocking to watch news of the
When I began my career as a scientist, geneticists were starting to analyze the molecular properties of single genes within a species. When we started looking at highly evolved species such as fruit flies, we thought we would find that their genes had been honed through selection over time, so they would be relatively homogeneous within single species. Examining one kind of protein controlled by a specific gene, we expected to find them all pretty much the same. Instead, we learned there was a great deal of heterogeneity or diversity. A gene specifying a protein could exist in a number of different states.
This is now called "genetic polymorphism" and is considered to be the very measure of a species' health. Inbreeding or reduction of a species to a small number reduces genetic polymorphism and exposes harmful genes, thereby rendering the species more susceptible to sudden change. In other words, genetic polymorphism confers resilience by providing greater possibilities as conditions shift.
Within ecosystems, species diversity provides greater flexibility to adjust to disturbances. Around the planet, ecosystem diversity has enabled life to flourish under different conditions. Like nested Russian dolls, life seems to have been built on diversity within diversity of genes, species and ecosystems.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Oil pipeline companies represent the predatory flow of capitalism unrestrained by responsibility for environmental destruction, contribution to global warming, scarring the natural landscape, and violating the rights of Indigenous people and others through the use of eminent domain to construct the pipelines. That list of foul deeds is just for starters.
That's why a September 1 article in The Daily Beast by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and friend of BuzzFlash David Cay Johnston is particularly alarming. Johnston details how many large oil pipeline companies are essentially exempt from corporate income tax. Not that anyone should be surprised that a destructive industry should be rewarded with special tax breaks. In fact, just yesterday we highlighted a report on how big banks receive tax breaks for enormous "performance-pay" bonuses given to CEOs.
What's more, Johnston points out that due to a recent arcane ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, many oil pipeline companies are allowed to include a tax that they don't pay in adjusting their pricing. That's correct: the oil pipeline companies that don't pay a corporate income tax can include the tax that is not levied on them as a "reasonable cost" in pumping up their invoice pricing.
JACKSON KATZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Gender norms influence not just what we think, but how. Consider the pervasive presence of sports metaphors in contemporary American politics. Metaphors are not merely figures of speech. According to the cognitive scientists and philosophers George Lakoff and Mark Johnson (1980), human thought processes themselves are largely metaphorical.
Metaphors from sports such as basketball and baseball regularly surface in political speech. But arguably the two most metaphorically influential sports in presidential campaign rhetoric are boxing and football. Not coincidentally, they are both violent sports that attract a disproportionate percentage of male participants and fans. It is only possible to speculate about how much of the white male vote is determined by impressions about the relative "manliness" or "toughness" of candidates or political parties. But there is no doubt that for several decades, violence -- both our individual and collective vulnerability to it, and questions about when and how to use the violent power of the state to protect the "national interest" -- has been an ominous and omnipresent factor in numerous foreign policy and domestic political issues (e.g. the Cold War, Vietnam, the "War on Terror," the invasion of Iraq, the emergence of ISIS, gun control, and executive, legislative, and judicial responses to violent crime). The frequent use of boxing and football metaphors in political discourse did not cause violence to become such an important force in our politics, but this usage is one measure of how presidential campaigns can be less about policy differences and complex political agendas than they can be about the selling of a certain kind of executive masculinity, embodied in a particular man whom the public comes to know largely through television and other technologies of mass communication.
Boxing metaphors play a crucial role in defining presidential campaigns as the ultimate arena for masculine competition. Boxing is a prototypical working-class or poor man's (or, more recently, woman's) sport that strips the notion of physical combat to its barest essence: man against man in a fight to the finish.
MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
The Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC released a report yesterday that details how taxpayers are subsidizing banks and massive CEO bonuses. The 34-page "Executive Excess 2016: The Wall Street CEO Bonus Loophole" confirms that Wall Street financial firms and their executives make out like bandits at the expense of everyday taxpaying Americans:
The more U.S. corporations hand out in CEO bonuses, the less they pay in taxes. This is the result of a loophole that allows firms to write off unlimited amounts of executive pay from their federal taxes, as long as it is in the form of so-called "performance-based" compensation.
Wall Street banks [only temporarily] lost this lucrative CEO pay subsidy when they received taxpayer-funded bailouts in the wake of the 2008 crash, but only until they repaid the funds. Many of them rushed to do so, borrowing in the private market in order to escape this and other public bailout-related pay controls. While homeowners and shareholders were still suffering, the banks were free once again to dole out massive bonuses and write off the entire cost, leaving ordinary taxpayers to make up the difference....
After getting out from under the bailout limits on deducting executive pay, the top 20 U.S. banks paid out more than $2 billion in fully deductible performance bonuses to their top five executives between 2012 and 2015. At a 35 percent corporate tax rate, this translates into a taxpayer subsidy worth more than $725 million, or $1.7 million per executive per year. That $725 million could’ve covered the cost of hiring 9,000 elementary school teachers or creating 13,000 infrastructure jobs for a year.
"Taxpayers should not have to subsidize excessive CEO bonuses at any corporation," lead report author Sarah Anderson, director of the institute's Global Economy Project, noted in an email announcing the finding.
ECOWATCH FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUTROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR. OF
Article reprinted with permission from EcoWatch
Earlier this month, my 15-year-old son, Aidan, and I joined a group of environmental activists on a six day float down Utah's Green River. In rafts and kayaks, we paddled Desolation and Gray canyons almost to the Colorado River confluence.
It was my second trip down the Green. In April 1966, I ran the prime white water stretches of the Yampa and Green through western Colorado and eastern Utah near Dinosaur National Park with my father and mother, U.S. Interior Secretary Stuart Udall and five of my 11 siblings. My father's friend, mountaineer Jim Whitaker, had organized that trip. Whittaker also accompanied my family on a Colorado River trip in 1964, down the Middle Fork of the Salmon in the summer of 1965 and on a kayak run on the upper Hudson's wild white water during a blizzard in May 1965. My father's purpose for the latter trip was to block an industry proposal to dam the Hudson River Gorge.
On each of those western trips, my father took us to nearby Navajo, Hopi and Ute reservations where we visited schools and health clinics and saw the despair among America's first nations mired in poverty, racism, oppression and hopelessness. My father taught us the history of the early American explorers, John Wesley Powell, John Charles Freemont, and Lewis and Clarke.
Following his brother, John Kennedy's assassination in 1963, he increasingly found spiritual renewal in wilderness which he considered "the undiluted work of the Creator." He saw white water as a way to struggle with nature without subduing it and he hoped that all that climbing, paddling and privation would imbue his children with the kind of beef jerky toughness he associated with the American character.
JIM HIGHTOWER ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT
Instead of griping about the greedheads of Wall Street and the rip-off financial system they've hung around our necks — why don't we "Take On Wall Street"?
You don't have to be in "Who's Who" to know what's what. For example, if tiny groups of Wall Street bankers, billionaires and their political puppets are allowed to write the rules that govern our economy and elections, guess what? Only bankers, billionaires and puppets will profit from those rules.
That's exactly why our Land of Opportunity has become today's Land of Inequality. Corporate elites have bought their way into the policy-making backrooms of Washington, where they've rigged the rules to let them feast freely on our jobs, devour our country's wealth and impoverish the middle class.
"Take On Wall Street" is both the name and the feisty attitude of a nationwide campaign that a coalition of grassroots groups has launched to do just that: Take on Wall Street. The coalition, spearheaded by the Communication Workers of America, points out that there is nothing natural or sacred about today's money-grabbing financial complex. Far from sacrosanct, the system of finance that now rules over us has been designed by and for Wall Street speculators, money managers, and big bank flim flammers. So — big surprise — rather than serving our common good, the system is corrupt, routinely serving their uncommon greed at everyone else's expense.