Facebook Slider
Optional Member Code
Get News Alerts!

War, which is to say, dehumanization and murder, remains not only morally acceptable but financially rewarding when we and our friends wage it. War, which is to say, dehumanization and murder, remains not only morally acceptable but financially rewarding when we and our friends wage it. (Photo: Alyson Hewett)ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

BuzzFlash and Truthout only exist because of support from our community of readers. Help us continue this work: Make a tax-deductible donation by clicking here.

A suicide bomber inflicts hell at a concert hall in Manchester, England that's full of children, as though that was the point -- to murder children.

The horror of war . . . well, terrorism . . . doesn't get any worse.

And the media, as they focus on the spectacle of what happened, as they cover the particulars of the tragedy -- the suspect's name and ethnicity and apparent grievances, the anguish of the survivors, the names and ages of the victims -- quietly tear the incident loose from most of its complexity and most of its context.

Yes, this was an act of terror. That piece of the puzzle is, of course, under intense scrutiny. The killer, Salman Abedi, age 22, was born in England to parents of Libyan descent and had recently traveled to Libya (where his parents now live) and Syria, where he may have been "radicalized." He likely didn't act alone.

LORRAINE CHOW OF ECOWATCH ON BUZZFLASH

Article reprinted with permission from EcoWatch

epa33The proposed Trump budget would slash the funds available to the EPA. (Photo: mccready)

Help us bring you the perspectives and insight that you won't find in the mainstream media. Click here to support BuzzFlash and Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) budget will still be slashed by nearly a third, from $8.2 billion to $5.65 billion, under President Trump's fiscal 2018 budget proposal released Tuesday.

The EPA, which has long been targeted by the Trump administration, is the hardest hit federal agency under the new plan. Opponents say it "endangers Americans" and cripples an institution charged with protecting their health and safety.

As detailed by the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, notable components of the anticipated budget include a 30 percent cut in federal grants to state and local air pollution control agencies; a 39 percent cut in EPA's Science and Technology budget; a 35 percent cut in EPA's Environmental Program and Management budget (the agency's overall operating budget); and the elimination of funding several regional programs, including restoration of the Chesapeake Bay, Great Lakes and Puget Sound.

The Washington Post noted that "dozens of other programs also would be zeroed out entirely, including funding for radon detection, lead risk reduction, projects along the U.S.-Mexico border and environmental justice initiatives." Additionally, less money will be allocated to enforcement of environmental crimes and climate change research.

PATRICK T. HILLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

saudiarabiacoatSales of weapons to Saudi Arabia (symbol above) often end up inflicting unjustifiable violence. (Image: Wikipedia)

Help us bring you the perspectives and insight that you won't find in the mainstream media. Click here to support BuzzFlash and Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.

Amidst a range of domestic controversies and the pushback against his agenda and actions, President Trump went back to one of his default personas, that of a self-proclaimed dealmaker “strongly protecting American interests.” During his trip to Saudi Arabia, President Trump signed an almost $ 110 billion arms deal supposedly in support of Saudi Arabia’s defense.

A May 20, 2017 press release “Supporting Saudi Arabia’s Defense Needs” from the U.S. State Department outlines the framework. How $110 billion worth of killing machinery such as tanks, artillery, helicopters, combatant ships, and other weapons systems reflect the State Department’s slogan “Diplomacy in Action” is a mythological stretch of imagination. More importantly though, this deal is the continuation of global arms trade practices that are sustained by several myths which are driven by a militarist consensus and acceptance of war profiteering regardless of who is President. With the help of historian Paul Holden and colleagues’ 2016 book Indefensible: Seven myths that sustain the global arms trade, it is now possible to shed new light on what we are led to believe such deals achieve.

The myth of increased security: According to the State Department, this deal supports the long-term security of Saudi Arabia in the face of malign Iranian influence and threats. That’s unlikely, given that Holden and colleagues demonstrated that increased weapons spending leads to arms races, increases security threats due to ill-conceived usage, and under-sources important non-military action. Looking at the bloodshed in the region, we now can say with certainty that the continued influx of weapons makes civilians caught in violent conflict less secure.

The myth of a sound national security analysis: More weapons provided by the United States into a volatile region will not only add fuel to the many regional fires, it will also undermine successful diplomatic initiatives such as the Iran Nuclear Deal. It is more likely that such deals are driven by economic considerations – that is, corporate profits or flat out corruption. In fact, the State Department does not hide the fact that this deal presumably expands opportunities for American companies in the region.

 the Republicans are going to decide that they cannot keep sitting on their hands, making up excuses for Trump while watching their moment for remaking America slip by. The Republicans are going to decide that they cannot keep sitting on their hands, making up excuses for Trump while watching their moment for "remaking America" slip by. (Photo: Gage Skidmore)MEL GURTOV FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Help us bring you the perspectives and insight that you won't find in the mainstream media. Click here to support BuzzFlash and Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.

"I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go," said Donald Trump to James Comey onFebruary 14, a day after General Flynn was fired as national security special assistant.  With those words, which Comey is said to have dutifully recorded in a memo, Trump may have put himself on the path to political oblivion.  For the first time we have proof that the president directly interfered in a federal investigation, a criminal offense.  To his credit, Comey did not "let it go."

Every day brings bad news for Trump's presidency.  Every day is a reminder that this man is mentally, temperamentally, and politically unfit for the highest office.  Every day also brings new risks to national security, which is in the hands of a commander in chief who is impulsive, uninformed, impervious to expert advice, and given to sudden movements that could mean war.  Donald Trump must go, but how?

Up until now I thought our and the nation's best hope was that somehow, some way, the Republican leadership in Congress would feel compelled by Trump's outrageous behavior to start the ball rolling toward impeachment.  Trump's bald-faced interference on Flynn's behalf leads me to a different denouement: his resignation, forced by the same Republicans who would otherwise never be persuaded to start impeachment proceedings.

For too long, Republican politicians have been feeding the public lies about the need to get rid of "job-killing regulations" and rein in "government overreach." These are phrases that are often used to describe the Environmental Protection Agency and the safeguards that are put in place to protect the environment.For too long, Republican politicians have been feeding the public lies about the need to get rid of "job-killing regulations" and rein in "government overreach." These are phrases that are often used to describe the Environmental Protection Agency and the safeguards that are put in place to protect the environment. (Photo: Joe Brusky)FARRON COUSINS FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

BuzzFlash and Truthout only exist because of support from our community of readers. Help us continue this work: Make a tax-deductible donation by clicking here.

A recent article published in Ars Technica discussed several conservative leaders -- ranging from religious figures to former Republican politicians -- attempting to convince conservatives that climate change was an issue that needed to be addressed by everyone, not just the liberals in the United States. The article discusses various ways that these conservatives are trying to approach the issue, from citing biblical passages about protecting the Earth, to educating conservative voters about the benefits of a carbon tax.

The Ars Technica article touched on a very important subject that is too often left out of discussions on climate change: Why are Republican politicians so successful when it comes to getting voters to vote against protecting the environment?

Polls from recent years have shown that majorities of Republicans, Democrats and those who don't describe themselves as either Republican or Democrat all believe that climate change is real, so we know that there is a general acceptance of climate science among the public. Yet the majority of elected Republicans in Washington, DC -- the party that controls all branches of government at this time -- either outright deny climate change or question the scientific consensus. So how can a party that openly attacks climate science and environmental protections win the support of people who claim to be concerned about the environment?

JIM HIGHTOWER ON BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

kleptocracyKleptocracy is a dagger in the heart of the US worker. (sharonkubo)

Like what you're reading? Help us publish more commentaries like this one -- donate to BuzzFlash and Truthout by clicking here!

The wailing in our country about the "invasion of immigrants" has been long and loud. As one complainant put it, "Few of their children in the country learn English... The signs in our streets have inscriptions in both languages... Unless the stream of the importation could be turned they will soon so outnumber us that all the advantages we have will not be able to preserve our language, and even our government will become precarious."

That's not some diatribe from the alt-right. It's the anxious cry of none other than Ben Franklin, deploring the wave of Germans pouring into the colony of Pennsylvania in the 1750s. Thus, anti-immigrant eruptions are older than the U.S. itself, and they've flared up periodically throughout our history, targeting the Irish, French, Italians and Chinese among others. Even Donald Trump's project to wall off our border is not a new bit of nuttiness — around the time of the nation's founding, John Jay, who later became the first chief justice of the Supreme Court, proposed "a wall of brass around the country for the exclusion of Catholics."

Luckily for the development and enrichment of our country, these past public frenzies ultimately failed to exclude the teeming masses, and those uproars now appear through the telescope of time to have been some combination of ridiculous panic, political demagoguery and xenophobic ugliness.

In our current national imbroglio over immigration coming from our 2,000-mile shared southern border, our "leaders" have set us up to look down at impoverished working people forced to leave their homeland and risk death in order to help their families escape poverty.

Are Christian conservative evangelicals so desperate for attention and an apocalyptic messenger that they’re turning to a disgraced televangelist to carry their End Times message?Are Christian conservative evangelicals so desperate for attention and an apocalyptic messenger that they’re turning to a disgraced televangelist to carry their End Times message? (Photo: sarowen)BILL BERKOWITZ FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Like what you're reading? Help us publish more commentaries like this one -- donate to BuzzFlash and Truthout by clicking here!

Are Christian conservative evangelicals so desperate for attention and an apocalyptic messenger that they’re turning to a disgraced televangelist to carry their End Times message? Ever in search of an End Times scenario that might resonate with its open-eared supporters, Steve Strang, the Christian conservative evangelical founder of Charisma magazine, and the CEO of Charisma Media, is turning to Jim Bakker for a revelation. And Bakker, the discredited PTL Club (Praise the Lord) televangelist who fleeced his audience, got involved in a juicy sexual scandal, and served time in prison, is claiming that the recent WannaCry "ransomware" cyberattack is a sign that World War III has already started. The early-May attack infected more than 230,000 computers in over 150 countries.

In a podcast interview, Bakker told Strang that the battle would not be fought with traditional weaponry; rather it will be with computers and satellites. And, it may not be a coincidence that on his Jim Bakker Show, he is hustling survivalist supplies to doomsday preppers.

On his show, Bakker made a point of claiming the "spirit of the Antichrist" was living inside of Donald Trump’s opponents.

In a piece titled, "What if Jim Bakker Is Right That the Ransomware Virus Is Part of Fulfilling End-Times Prophecy?" Strang writes that he doesn’t mind "if the secular community makes fun of it or thinks that it is just a lot of superstition," his folks know that "the spiritual realm is where things really happen. We also know that God is in control, that He has a plan and purpose, and that He revealed to the apostle John what would happen in the last days, which John wrote about in the book of Revelation."

So far the media have shown little curiosity beyond the symptom. I fear it's because their benefactor is the disease.So far the media have shown little curiosity beyond the symptom. I fear it's because their benefactor is the disease. (Photo: Gage Skidmore)ROBERT C. KOEHLER FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Help us bring you the perspectives and insight that you won't find in the mainstream media. Click here to support BuzzFlash and Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.

"Trump emphasized the need to work together to end the conflict in Syria" . . . and "emphasized his desire to build a better relationship between the United States and Russia."

Welcome to the last paragraph of a Washington Post story the other day, a loose fragment of news, a homeless child, a cynical trigger. This is the story in which we learn that "President Trump revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting last week" and the let's-be-friends comment was part of the official White House statement about the meeting, the point of which was to dismiss the Post's allegations as false.

And indeed, the statement comes wrapped in cynicism, as though our proto-fascist, race-baiting, bomb-happy president carries the world's hope for peace in his heart. Nonetheless, I feel the need to rescue this paragraph from the rest of the Post's story, which details the latest manifestation of Russiagate in Trumpville.

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

singlepayer56Single-payer legislation is brewing at the state level. (Photo: Juhan Sonin)

BuzzFlash and Truthout only exist because of support from our community of readers. Help us continue this work: Make a tax-deductible donation by clicking here.

A single-payer health care bill passed the New York State Assembly for the fourth time on Tuesday, and is headed for the State Senate. The Senate has turned down the bill before, but according to The Village Voice, its prospects are growing more favorable this year:

Currently, the bill is only two votes shy of passing in the 63-seat state senate. It recently picked up the support of the influential Independent Democratic Conference, buoying its number of supporters to 30.

A special election on May 23 to fill an assembly seat vacated by now-council member Bill Perkins is all but guaranteed to go to real estate developer Brian Benjamin, who has vowed to support the bill, Rivera told the Voice. The only hurdles now include the conversion of just one more holdout — the most likely target is Senator Simcha Felder, a Democrat who caucuses with Republicans — plus a small pile of procedural battles. Felder, who told the Guardian in April that he had no position on the bill, did not respond to multiple phone calls and emails from the Voice.

In addition to the city's budget crisis and corresponding high levels of poverty, Los Angeles has one of the country's worst records of police brutality. What's less obvious is that the Olympics are set to make it even worse.In addition to the city's budget crisis and corresponding high levels of poverty, Los Angeles has one of the country's worst records of police brutality. What's less obvious is that the Olympics are set to make it even worse. (Photo: Kevin Stanchfield)CLARA HERZBERG FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

BuzzFlash and Truthout only exist because of support from our community of readers. Help us continue this work: Make a tax-deductible donation by clicking here.

On May 12, the leaders of Los Angeles' $5 billion bid for the 2024 Olympics wrapped up nearly four days’ worth of courting inspectors from the International Olympic Committee (IOC)Evaluation Commission. Both sides did their best to dazzle, with the committee trumpeting their dinner with stars like Kobe Bryant, and with commission chair Patrick Baumann describing the city's venues as "spectacular." Meanwhile, however, evaluators banned members of the public from attending their meetings and shooed away journalists during the tour. Their secrecy stemmed in part from the fact that the city's bid is running up against growing opposition, spearheaded by the new campaign group, NOlympics LA. The organization, started by the LA chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, aims to bring attention to the negative effects the 2024 Olympics would have on Angelenos -- especially the most vulnerable. Their movement couldn't come at a better moment.

At a time when is Los Angeles is already among the most unequal places in the country, the city shouldn't waste close to $5 billion to impress the IOC, but should instead use the generous funds earmarked for the Olympics bid to help the city's most disadvantaged residents. As Jonny Coleman, an organizer with NOlympics LA, said, "LA has no shortage of problems that are more urgent than securing the bid."

Page 16 of 1487